We are going to have a debate. The topic of the debate is our own decision. I am the positive side. I need to ask a few questions to question the negative side. I am urgently asking for thanks.
As a positive, you can consider asking the following questions to question the negative: 1 What is "our youth is our own decision"? In this sentence, who should make this decision? What did this decision mean? If youth needs to make decisions, what should these decisions be like? Does it include immoral or inappropriate decisions? If a person can't make his own decision, then is there any meaning to his youth? Are there enough resources for everyone to make their own decisions? If so, where did these resources come from? If not, then why? Should a person be blamed or punished if he cannot make his own decisions? If so, was this accusation or punishment reasonable? 6. Do those who make their own decisions receive the respect and support they deserve? If so, why? If not, then why? Is there enough education and social training to help people make the right decisions? If so, where was the training conducted? If not, then why? If a person's youth is limited or deprived, does he still have the right to pursue his dreams and goals? If so, why? If not, then why? These questions can help you better understand the opposing side's point of view and arguments in order to better debate.
Now, we are going to have a debate competition. The negative side's debate topic is more important for the creative ability of the work of art. The positive side's inspiration for the creation of the work of art is more important. We are the negative side.
The ability to create works of art is more important. The positive side is the inspiration for the creation of works of art is more important. We are the negative side. We can refer to the following arguments that the negative side debater might make: 1. Creation inspiration can be crammed up at the last minute, but creation ability is the result of long-term accumulation. If you only have creative inspiration but no creative ability, then the work may lack depth and content. It's just simple plagiarism or imitation. If one only had the ability to create without inspiration, they might fall into the quagmire of plagiarism or imitation. Therefore, creative ability was more important than inspiration. 2. The ability to create can be cultivated, but inspiration can come from accumulation. If we can continue to learn, think and practice, we can cultivate our own creative ability. However, if one only had creative inspiration and no creative ability, they might lack creativity and competitiveness, making it difficult for them to stand out in the art market. Therefore, creative ability was more important than inspiration. 3. The creative ability can be measured, but the creative inspiration cannot. We can evaluate the creative ability of a work of art in various ways, such as evaluating its technique, content, style, and so on. And if we only have inspiration, we can't measure the value of a work by the same standard. Therefore, creative ability was more important than inspiration. 4. The ability to create can affect the value of a work of art, while inspiration can determine the direction and style of the work. An artist with creative ability might show different styles and characteristics in different works. However, if one only had creative inspiration, they might fall into a single creative style and it would be difficult to produce unique artistic value. Therefore, creative ability was more important than inspiration. These arguments can be used as the opposing debater's point of view in the debate, but it should be noted that the debate is not only a simple statement of the point of view, but also through logic, evidence and examples to support their point of view in order to win the game.
In the debate, I was the opposing side. The college students participating in volunteer activities focused on training. Ask for a debate topic.
College students participating in volunteer activities focused on training. On the contrary, it could be argued that college students participating in volunteer activities could not directly train their personal abilities, but might waste time and resources. Here are some possible counterarguments: 1. volunteer activities may affect college students 'studies. If college students participated in volunteer activities too frequently, it might take up their time and cause them to be unable to concentrate on their studies. Moreover, volunteer activities usually required a long time to participate in, which would have a certain negative impact on the health of college students. 2. volunteer activities do not provide practical work experience for college students. Although volunteer activities could cultivate college students 'sense of social responsibility and teamwork, these experiences could not be directly converted into professional experience. For most college students, their main goal was to find a job after graduation. Therefore, volunteer activities were not a necessary step in their career planning. 3. volunteer activities can't improve the academic performance of college students. Although volunteer activities can help students build a good sense of community and social responsibility, they can't directly improve students 'academic performance. Many college students participate in volunteer activities to find a better job after graduation rather than to enrich their studies. 4. The voluntary activities can't improve the professional skills of college students. Although volunteer activities can help students develop their leadership and teamwork skills, they cannot directly improve their professional skills. For many college students, they need to learn professional knowledge in school in order to find a better job after graduation. Therefore, volunteer activities were not a necessary step for them to improve their skills.
The negative side of pop songs was greater than the positive side. This is our school's debate competition. We need to debate the views. Everyone should be more enthusiastic and get extra points.
The negative effects of pop songs mainly included: Air Pollution: Many pop songs are accompanied by intense drumming and singing. This music may produce noise and pollute the air. 2. Affects mental health: pop songs may cause listeners to get excited and lose control of their emotions, especially at night or when they are alone. These types of music can have a negative impact on mental health. 3. Waste of resources: Many popular songs need to be purchased or downloaded, which will lead to a waste of resources. In addition, the spread of popular songs could also lead to copyright issues. However, pop songs also had positive effects. 1. Promotion of cultural exchange: pop songs are an important part of cultural exchange. They can help people better understand and appreciate different music and cultures across cultural differences and language barriers. 2. Stimulate creativity: Many popular songs are created by independent musicians and artists. This music inspires people's creativity and imagination, which has promoted the development of the music industry. 3. Stimulating consumption: pop songs can motivate listeners to buy goods and digital products to promote economic development. To sum up, pop songs had both negative and positive effects. It was a complicated question whether popular songs should be restricted or banned, which required a comprehensive consideration of various factors.
In the debate competition, I am the affirmative and second debate. The debate topic society should value profit over righteousness. How should I ask the other party questions? I want examples.
As the second defender, you can ask the other party the following questions: Please give an example of why society should value profit over righteousness. For example, you can ask the other party,"Why should society value profit over righteousness?" Make the other person understand your argument and provide some concrete examples to support it. For example, you might say," Because the interests of society are money and material wealth, and ethics are concerned with people's inner values." Please explain why it is beneficial to society to value profit over righteousness. You can ask the other party,"Why is it good for society to value profit over righteousness?" Make the other person understand your argument and provide some concrete examples to support it. For example, you might say," Prioritizing profit over justice makes society more efficient and orderly because people are more focused on business interests than ethics." Please explain why ethics should not be replaced. You can ask the other person,"Why shouldn't ethics be replaced?" Make the other person understand your argument and provide some concrete examples to support it. For example, you might say," Morality can help us form the right values, and money and material wealth are only a part of human society. Therefore, ethics are indispensable." 4. Please give an example of how to value profit over righteousness in practice. You can ask the other party,"Why is it so obvious in practice to value profit over righteousness?" Make the other person understand your argument and provide some concrete examples to support it. For example, you might say," A lot of business activities are based on the principle of profit over justice, such as greedy business giants and illegal monopolies." I hope these questions will help you better ask the other person and support your argument.
The debate competition is about the classics or the popular literature. The questions that can be asked in the free debate segment, I am on the side of the classics, so it is best to be original.
As a classic author, I can ask the following questions to support my point of view: Classic works contain profound thoughts and values that have a profound impact on our growth and development. For example, the social reality and characters described in Dream of the Red Chamber are worthy of our deep consideration and reflection, and the concept of love and marriage in Pride and Predict has a profound revelation for our aesthetic and love. These works not only help us understand the world, but also shape our aesthetics and values. 2. Classic works have extremely high literary and artistic value, leaving precious cultural heritage for future generations. These works not only have a unique charm in language, structure and style, but also reflect the cultural, social and historical background of the time with eternal charm. For example, the plays Hamlet and The White Night Journey by William shakespeare are regarded as the classics in the history of world literature. They not only let us feel the complexity of human emotions and thoughts, but also let us realize the value and significance of literature. 3. Classic works can stimulate our inspiration and creativity. Many classic works were the source of inspiration for authors. For example, Cao Xueqin created a unique literary style through detailed descriptions and imaginative plot designs in Dream of the Red Chamber. Classics can also stimulate our imagination and creativity, making us more determined and confident in the pursuit of our dreams and goals. To sum up, the classic works have a profound and lasting influence on us. Classic works contain profound thoughts and values that can shape our aesthetics and values. Classic works have extremely high literary and artistic value, which can stimulate our inspiration and creativity. Although popular literature also has a certain effect on us, the effect of classic works is more obvious and lasting.
As the third debate of the pros and cons of the online debate, I need to ask some thought-provoking and difficult questions that will make the positive side speechless. Do you have any suggestions?
If the disadvantages of the Internet are greater than the advantages, what measures do you think should be taken to solve it? Or do you think there are any web novels or online communities that have obvious negative effects? Do you have any innovative solutions to these negative effects? I hope these questions will help you perform more sharply in the debate.
In the college debate competition, the topic of debate was whether the college students 'major choice should be based on their personal interests or their future. I am the opposing side, seeking freedom to debate the problem,
The opposing side's second defense is very grateful for the free debate question you provided. Here are some possible questions for your reference: Is it necessary to balance personal interests and professional prospects? If you have to make a choice, which factor do you think should be prioritized? Should personal interests be excluded when choosing a major? If you have to make a choice, which major do you think you should prioritize your personal interests? 3. How to ensure that students don't lose their motivation for majors that have no obvious interest? How to encourage students to pursue their interests while also considering their future employment prospects? Should students who are interested but have poor job prospects choose this major? If students choose this major, will they succeed? Should students 'personal background and adaptability be taken into account when choosing a major? If students don't have enough background and adaptability, can they adapt to the new major?
The Negative Side of the Internet Pros and Cons Debate
The conclusion of the opposing side of the online pros and cons debate: The advantages of the network: 1. Ease: The Internet makes information transmission faster and more convenient. People can obtain information from any part of the world in a few seconds. 2. Freedom: The Internet is a free space where people can freely express their thoughts and opinions on the Internet without restrictions. Sharing: The Internet allows people to share their knowledge and experience, making knowledge more universal and shared. 4. Creation: The Internet provides more opportunities for people to create and start businesses. People can achieve more innovation and inventions through the Internet. Weakness of the Internet: Fake: The authenticity and credibility of online information are questioned. Some information may be processed and processed to lack authenticity. 2. Misleading: Information on the Internet spreads very quickly. Some information may be mistransmitted and misinterpreted to mislead people's judgments and decisions. 3. Invasion of privacy: The spread of online information may invade people's privacy and expose people's personal information. 4. Addiction: Overuse of the Internet may cause people to be addicted to the online world and affect their physical and mental health. To sum up, the network has many advantages and disadvantages. When using the network, we need to rationally view its advantages and disadvantages, make full use of its advantages and avoid its disadvantages, so as to better use the network to bring more value to our society and individuals.
I'm going to participate in the debate tomorrow. I'm the opposing side. The topic of the debate is that the information on the Internet is not credible! I need a lot of materials. I hope everyone can help.
The credibility of information on the Internet was a very complicated problem because it involved the reliability of the source of the information, the accuracy of the information, the authenticity of the information, and many other aspects. Here is some information that might be useful to you: The reliability of information sources: There are many sources of information on the Internet, including search engines, news websites, social media, forums, and so on. However, the reliability of these sources is not necessarily the same because they may be affected by political, commercial, cultural and other factors. Therefore, when judging whether the information on the Internet was credible, the reliability of the information source needed to be considered. The accuracy of the information: There is a lot of information on the Internet, many of which are unverified or subjective. Therefore, the accuracy of the information on the Internet needed to be considered when judging whether it was credible. News, social media, and other time-sensitive information needed to be closely monitored to avoid being misled. The authenticity of the information: The information on the Internet may also contain false information. This information may have been deliberately fabricated, forged, or based on inaccurate sources. Therefore, the authenticity of the information on the Internet needed to be considered when judging whether it was credible or not. The value of information: Although the information on the Internet may contain false information and inaccurate information, if the content of the information is valuable, it can still have a positive impact on people. Therefore, the value of the information on the Internet needed to be considered when judging whether it was credible or not. This is some information that might be useful to you. Of course, the materials needed for the debate might include how to analyze the reliability and accuracy of online information, how to identify false information, how to evaluate the value of information, and so on. If you need more detailed help, I suggest you consult your debate instructor or coach.
In our debate competition, we were in the affirmative, and the topic was,"There must be a return for the effort." The opposing side's topic was,"There must be a return for the effort." How to distinguish the positive side
The affirmative side could debate around the following points: Contribution and return are closely related: there is a close relationship between contribution and return. Only by giving first can you expect to get a return. Whether it was in work, study, or personal life, we all need to put in effort and sweat before we can reap results and rewards. Therefore, in the debate, it can be emphasized that effort and reward are related. Only by putting in enough effort can you get the corresponding reward. The returns are usually visible: the returns between effort and return are usually visible. When we put in effort, we usually see the corresponding results and gains. For example, when we put in enough effort in work or study, we usually get rewards such as improvement and harvest. Therefore, it can be emphasized in the debate that the reward is usually visible, and only by putting in enough effort can you see the corresponding reward. 3. Contribution and return are proportional: Contribution and return are proportional. Our efforts and returns are usually proportional. Only by putting in enough effort can we get the corresponding returns. For example, when we put in enough effort at work, we usually get a higher position, better salary, and other rewards. Therefore, in the debate, it can be emphasized that effort and return are proportional. Only by putting in enough effort can you get the corresponding return. Success requires constant effort: the relationship between effort and return is constantly accumulating and sublimating. Only by constantly putting in effort could one continuously reap rewards. Success is not something that can be achieved overnight. It requires constant perseverance and hard work. Therefore, it can be emphasized in the debate that success requires constant effort. Only by putting in enough effort can you achieve continuous success. The above are some points that the positive side can revolve around. They can be freely developed and supplemented according to the specific situation and topic of the debate.