The negative side of pop songs was greater than the positive side. This is our school's debate competition. We need to debate the views. Everyone should be more enthusiastic and get extra points.

2024-09-18 00:09

1 answer

2024-09-18 00:56

The negative effects of pop songs mainly included: Air Pollution: Many pop songs are accompanied by intense drumming and singing. This music may produce noise and pollute the air. 2. Affects mental health: pop songs may cause listeners to get excited and lose control of their emotions, especially at night or when they are alone. These types of music can have a negative impact on mental health. 3. Waste of resources: Many popular songs need to be purchased or downloaded, which will lead to a waste of resources. In addition, the spread of popular songs could also lead to copyright issues. However, pop songs also had positive effects. 1. Promotion of cultural exchange: pop songs are an important part of cultural exchange. They can help people better understand and appreciate different music and cultures across cultural differences and language barriers. 2. Stimulate creativity: Many popular songs are created by independent musicians and artists. This music inspires people's creativity and imagination, which has promoted the development of the music industry. 3. Stimulating consumption: pop songs can motivate listeners to buy goods and digital products to promote economic development. To sum up, pop songs had both negative and positive effects. It was a complicated question whether popular songs should be restricted or banned, which required a comprehensive consideration of various factors.

Debate competition materials, positive side: doing is more important than saying; Negative side: saying is more important than doing.

1 answer

2024-09-17 01:29

The theme of this debate was about the importance of doing and talking. The positive side believed that doing was more important than talking, while the negative side believed that talking was more important than doing. Affirmative point of view: actions are more important than words. Because doing was a practical action that could bring direct and practical benefits. When we make a decision or action, we are actually responsible for it and trying to achieve it. Only when we put our ideas and beliefs into action can we prove that they are correct. In contrast, verbal expressions could not bring about actual changes. Opposite point of view: Saying is more important than doing. This was because it allowed people to express their thoughts and opinions, thereby arousing the resonance and support of others. By speaking, we can pass on information and knowledge to help others better understand our views and beliefs. In addition, it can also bring certain social benefits, allowing us to establish connections and interactions with others. The outcome of this debate depended on the opinions and arguments of both parties. In the end, it had to be judged based on facts and logic. Both sides needed to provide sufficient evidence and reasons to convince the audience.

Now, we are going to have a debate competition. The negative side's debate topic is more important for the creative ability of the work of art. The positive side's inspiration for the creation of the work of art is more important. We are the negative side.

1 answer

2024-09-18 06:14

The ability to create works of art is more important. The positive side is the inspiration for the creation of works of art is more important. We are the negative side. We can refer to the following arguments that the negative side debater might make: 1. Creation inspiration can be crammed up at the last minute, but creation ability is the result of long-term accumulation. If you only have creative inspiration but no creative ability, then the work may lack depth and content. It's just simple plagiarism or imitation. If one only had the ability to create without inspiration, they might fall into the quagmire of plagiarism or imitation. Therefore, creative ability was more important than inspiration. 2. The ability to create can be cultivated, but inspiration can come from accumulation. If we can continue to learn, think and practice, we can cultivate our own creative ability. However, if one only had creative inspiration and no creative ability, they might lack creativity and competitiveness, making it difficult for them to stand out in the art market. Therefore, creative ability was more important than inspiration. 3. The creative ability can be measured, but the creative inspiration cannot. We can evaluate the creative ability of a work of art in various ways, such as evaluating its technique, content, style, and so on. And if we only have inspiration, we can't measure the value of a work by the same standard. Therefore, creative ability was more important than inspiration. 4. The ability to create can affect the value of a work of art, while inspiration can determine the direction and style of the work. An artist with creative ability might show different styles and characteristics in different works. However, if one only had creative inspiration, they might fall into a single creative style and it would be difficult to produce unique artistic value. Therefore, creative ability was more important than inspiration. These arguments can be used as the opposing debater's point of view in the debate, but it should be noted that the debate is not only a simple statement of the point of view, but also through logic, evidence and examples to support their point of view in order to win the game.

In the debate competition, our side's point of view is more harmful than beneficial to the unification of history. How to refute the other side's "

1 answer

2024-09-11 14:50

First of all, we need to make it clear that the purpose of the debate is not to refute the other party's point of view, but to convince the other party to accept our point of view. Therefore, before refuting the other party's point of view, we need to think about how to better express our point of view. If the other party thinks that jokes do more harm than good to the spread of history, we can refute it from the following aspects: Jokes could allow people to understand history more deeply. Joking not only allowed people to understand the background and details of historical events, but also allowed people to understand the views and attitudes of different figures in historical events, so as to better understand the evolution of historical figures and historical events. Joking could improve people's cultural quality. History is an important part of culture, and jokes can be used as an interesting form of cultural expression to let people better understand and understand history and culture. Jokes could enrich people's entertainment life. Although historical events were important, they were often boring. Joking could be used as a form of entertainment to let people understand historical events in a relaxed atmosphere and improve their quality of life. To sum up, we can come to the conclusion that although the joke may bring some negative effects, it plays an important role in the popularity of history. It can make people have a deeper understanding of history, improve cultural quality and enrich their entertainment life. Therefore, I think the joke has more disadvantages than advantages for the popularity of history.

The Negative Side of the Internet Pros and Cons Debate

1 answer

2024-09-14 03:35

The conclusion of the opposing side of the online pros and cons debate: The advantages of the network: 1. Ease: The Internet makes information transmission faster and more convenient. People can obtain information from any part of the world in a few seconds. 2. Freedom: The Internet is a free space where people can freely express their thoughts and opinions on the Internet without restrictions. Sharing: The Internet allows people to share their knowledge and experience, making knowledge more universal and shared. 4. Creation: The Internet provides more opportunities for people to create and start businesses. People can achieve more innovation and inventions through the Internet. Weakness of the Internet: Fake: The authenticity and credibility of online information are questioned. Some information may be processed and processed to lack authenticity. 2. Misleading: Information on the Internet spreads very quickly. Some information may be mistransmitted and misinterpreted to mislead people's judgments and decisions. 3. Invasion of privacy: The spread of online information may invade people's privacy and expose people's personal information. 4. Addiction: Overuse of the Internet may cause people to be addicted to the online world and affect their physical and mental health. To sum up, the network has many advantages and disadvantages. When using the network, we need to rationally view its advantages and disadvantages, make full use of its advantages and avoid its disadvantages, so as to better use the network to bring more value to our society and individuals.

We are going to have a debate. The topic of the debate is our own decision. I am the positive side. I need to ask a few questions to question the negative side. I am urgently asking for thanks.

1 answer

2024-09-18 06:04

As a positive, you can consider asking the following questions to question the negative: 1 What is "our youth is our own decision"? In this sentence, who should make this decision? What did this decision mean? If youth needs to make decisions, what should these decisions be like? Does it include immoral or inappropriate decisions? If a person can't make his own decision, then is there any meaning to his youth? Are there enough resources for everyone to make their own decisions? If so, where did these resources come from? If not, then why? Should a person be blamed or punished if he cannot make his own decisions? If so, was this accusation or punishment reasonable? 6. Do those who make their own decisions receive the respect and support they deserve? If so, why? If not, then why? Is there enough education and social training to help people make the right decisions? If so, where was the training conducted? If not, then why? If a person's youth is limited or deprived, does he still have the right to pursue his dreams and goals? If so, why? If not, then why? These questions can help you better understand the opposing side's point of view and arguments in order to better debate.

Should middle school students read extra-cursory books to debate the opposite side of the argument

1 answer

2024-09-10 14:27

Honorable judges, dear listeners, today I, as the opposing party, would like to raise a point: middle school students should not read extra-cursory books. First of all, we need to be clear about what extra-cursory books are. Extra-cursory books referred to any books other than textbooks and course materials, including novels, essays, poems, biographies, history, philosophy, and so on. In this information age, we are easily surrounded by all kinds of media and access to a huge amount of information, but we often ignore the power of books. Books can teach us knowledge, inspire us to think, cultivate our imagination and creativity, which are the basic skills we need in modern society. However, for middle school students, reading extra-cursory books might bring some negative effects. First of all, textbooks and course materials were the foundation of their learning. These materials could meet their basic learning needs. If middle school students read too many extra-cursory books, it may distract their attention and affect their academic performance. Secondly, excessive reading of extra-cursory books may lead to the decline of middle school students 'reading ability, affecting their future learning and development. In addition, the content of the extra-cursory books might not be suitable for middle school students to read. Some books involve sensitive topics, violence, sex, and other content. If middle school students read these books, it may have a negative impact on their physical and mental health. Moreover, the content of some books may be too complicated or difficult to understand, which may have a negative impact on the thinking ability of middle school students. Therefore, I think middle school students should focus on studying textbooks and course materials instead of reading extra-cursory books. At the age of students, they should concentrate on learning basic knowledge and cultivate their own thinking ability and creativity, which is the key to future success.

Our school is holding a debate. We want to know if primary school students should read the positive and negative arguments of extra-cursory books... Please, I need it urgently!

1 answer

2024-09-14 05:20

Whether it is appropriate for primary school students to read extra-cursory books involves many ethical, moral, educational and other issues, so the positive and negative views may be different. Here are some possible arguments: Positive point of view: Reading is beneficial. Reading can help primary school students expand their vocabulary, improve their reading comprehension ability, and cultivate their thinking ability and imagination. In addition, reading could also enrich the after-school life of primary school students and improve their cultural quality and aesthetic standards. Pupils should maintain curiosity and thirst for knowledge. Reading can stimulate their curiosity and thirst for knowledge, cultivate their interest in learning and creativity. 3. Reading can cultivate the ability of independent thinking and critical thinking of primary school students. By reading different kinds of books, primary school students can learn knowledge and ideas in different fields and cultivate their independent thinking and judgment. Opposite point of view: Reading may distract primary school students and affect their studies and grades. Primary school students should focus on their studies and not be distracted by reading when they are in class and doing homework. Reading may make primary school students addicted and affect their family life. Parents should strictly control the reading time of primary school students to ensure that they have enough time to focus on family life and extra-cursory activities. 3. Reading may cause primary school students to lose interest in textbook knowledge, resulting in a decline in academic performance. Therefore, schools should strengthen the textbook education for primary school students so that they can master the basic knowledge and also have the ability to read. These are just some possible arguments. The specific arguments still need to be designed and adjusted according to the specific situation and theme. During the debate, both sides should make their views more convincing through sufficient communication and argumentation, and finally reach a conclusion that was beneficial to them.

In the debate competition, our side's topic is that there is real friendship on the Internet. I urgently need the opposing side's topic (there is no real friendship on the Internet).

1 answer

2024-09-18 06:10

Opposite side: There is no true friendship on the Internet. Although online friendships were not as intuitive and easy to feel as face-to-face friendships, online friendships could also have real friendships. Online friendships required mutual trust and respect, as well as a willingness to maintain relative privacy and caution on the Internet. Although online communication may not be as direct and real-time as face-to-face communication, both parties can maintain contact through text, voice, video and other means to share each other's lives and emotions, which can also establish a true friendship. Online friendships could also be built on social relationships in the virtual world. Although this relationship may not be as close and deep as the friendship in real life, it can also be a real friendship because both parties can communicate, support and encourage each other in the virtual world to establish an emotional bond similar to family or friendship. Although there might be some misunderstandings, distrust, and contradictions in online friendships, this did not mean that there were no real friendships on the Internet. As long as both parties were willing to maintain caution and respect, and were willing to seek understanding and communication on the Internet, they could establish a true friendship. Therefore, we should not simply regard online friendships as a kind of "fake" friendship, but should realize that online friendships can also have real feelings and meanings.

In our debate competition, we were in the affirmative, and the topic was,"There must be a return for the effort." The opposing side's topic was,"There must be a return for the effort." How to distinguish the positive side

1 answer

2024-09-18 06:16

The affirmative side could debate around the following points: Contribution and return are closely related: there is a close relationship between contribution and return. Only by giving first can you expect to get a return. Whether it was in work, study, or personal life, we all need to put in effort and sweat before we can reap results and rewards. Therefore, in the debate, it can be emphasized that effort and reward are related. Only by putting in enough effort can you get the corresponding reward. The returns are usually visible: the returns between effort and return are usually visible. When we put in effort, we usually see the corresponding results and gains. For example, when we put in enough effort in work or study, we usually get rewards such as improvement and harvest. Therefore, it can be emphasized in the debate that the reward is usually visible, and only by putting in enough effort can you see the corresponding reward. 3. Contribution and return are proportional: Contribution and return are proportional. Our efforts and returns are usually proportional. Only by putting in enough effort can we get the corresponding returns. For example, when we put in enough effort at work, we usually get a higher position, better salary, and other rewards. Therefore, in the debate, it can be emphasized that effort and return are proportional. Only by putting in enough effort can you get the corresponding return. Success requires constant effort: the relationship between effort and return is constantly accumulating and sublimating. Only by constantly putting in effort could one continuously reap rewards. Success is not something that can be achieved overnight. It requires constant perseverance and hard work. Therefore, it can be emphasized in the debate that success requires constant effort. Only by putting in enough effort can you achieve continuous success. The above are some points that the positive side can revolve around. They can be freely developed and supplemented according to the specific situation and topic of the debate.

The disadvantages of online language are greater than the advantages. The debate competition definitely has additional points.

1 answer

2024-09-25 14:11

Online language refers to the various expressions that are popular on the Internet, including texts, pictures, videos, and so on. Although the network language has promoted the development of network culture to a certain extent, there are also some negative effects. Online language often lacked norms and standards to ensure the accuracy and rigor of the language. Due to the rapid spread of online language, some online vocabulary and expressions may be abused or misused, resulting in language confusion and disunity. Online language often had strong emotions and aggressiveness, which easily formed a bad social atmosphere. Some online language is insulting, discriminative or offensive, which can easily mislead people's thoughts and aggravate social divisions and conflicts. The popularity of online languages could also lead to the regulation and unification of languages. The emergence and development of some online languages may affect the norms and standards of traditional languages. Therefore, we need to properly regulate and supervise the language of the Internet to avoid its negative effects. Although there are some negative effects of online language, we can't deny its positive effects. In the development and application of online language, we need to maintain prudence and rationality, avoid excessive emotions and aggression, and promote the regulation and standards of language to contribute to the development of online culture.