Now, we are going to have a debate competition. The negative side's debate topic is more important for the creative ability of the work of art. The positive side's inspiration for the creation of the work of art is more important. We are the negative side.
The ability to create works of art is more important. The positive side is the inspiration for the creation of works of art is more important. We are the negative side. We can refer to the following arguments that the negative side debater might make: 1. Creation inspiration can be crammed up at the last minute, but creation ability is the result of long-term accumulation. If you only have creative inspiration but no creative ability, then the work may lack depth and content. It's just simple plagiarism or imitation. If one only had the ability to create without inspiration, they might fall into the quagmire of plagiarism or imitation. Therefore, creative ability was more important than inspiration. 2. The ability to create can be cultivated, but inspiration can come from accumulation. If we can continue to learn, think and practice, we can cultivate our own creative ability. However, if one only had creative inspiration and no creative ability, they might lack creativity and competitiveness, making it difficult for them to stand out in the art market. Therefore, creative ability was more important than inspiration. 3. The creative ability can be measured, but the creative inspiration cannot. We can evaluate the creative ability of a work of art in various ways, such as evaluating its technique, content, style, and so on. And if we only have inspiration, we can't measure the value of a work by the same standard. Therefore, creative ability was more important than inspiration. 4. The ability to create can affect the value of a work of art, while inspiration can determine the direction and style of the work. An artist with creative ability might show different styles and characteristics in different works. However, if one only had creative inspiration, they might fall into a single creative style and it would be difficult to produce unique artistic value. Therefore, creative ability was more important than inspiration. These arguments can be used as the opposing debater's point of view in the debate, but it should be noted that the debate is not only a simple statement of the point of view, but also through logic, evidence and examples to support their point of view in order to win the game.
Debate competition materials, positive side: doing is more important than saying; Negative side: saying is more important than doing.
The theme of this debate was about the importance of doing and talking. The positive side believed that doing was more important than talking, while the negative side believed that talking was more important than doing. Affirmative point of view: actions are more important than words. Because doing was a practical action that could bring direct and practical benefits. When we make a decision or action, we are actually responsible for it and trying to achieve it. Only when we put our ideas and beliefs into action can we prove that they are correct. In contrast, verbal expressions could not bring about actual changes. Opposite point of view: Saying is more important than doing. This was because it allowed people to express their thoughts and opinions, thereby arousing the resonance and support of others. By speaking, we can pass on information and knowledge to help others better understand our views and beliefs. In addition, it can also bring certain social benefits, allowing us to establish connections and interactions with others. The outcome of this debate depended on the opinions and arguments of both parties. In the end, it had to be judged based on facts and logic. Both sides needed to provide sufficient evidence and reasons to convince the audience.
The negative side of pop songs was greater than the positive side. This is our school's debate competition. We need to debate the views. Everyone should be more enthusiastic and get extra points.
The negative effects of pop songs mainly included: Air Pollution: Many pop songs are accompanied by intense drumming and singing. This music may produce noise and pollute the air. 2. Affects mental health: pop songs may cause listeners to get excited and lose control of their emotions, especially at night or when they are alone. These types of music can have a negative impact on mental health. 3. Waste of resources: Many popular songs need to be purchased or downloaded, which will lead to a waste of resources. In addition, the spread of popular songs could also lead to copyright issues. However, pop songs also had positive effects. 1. Promotion of cultural exchange: pop songs are an important part of cultural exchange. They can help people better understand and appreciate different music and cultures across cultural differences and language barriers. 2. Stimulate creativity: Many popular songs are created by independent musicians and artists. This music inspires people's creativity and imagination, which has promoted the development of the music industry. 3. Stimulating consumption: pop songs can motivate listeners to buy goods and digital products to promote economic development. To sum up, pop songs had both negative and positive effects. It was a complicated question whether popular songs should be restricted or banned, which required a comprehensive consideration of various factors.
The Negative Side of the Internet Pros and Cons Debate
The conclusion of the opposing side of the online pros and cons debate: The advantages of the network: 1. Ease: The Internet makes information transmission faster and more convenient. People can obtain information from any part of the world in a few seconds. 2. Freedom: The Internet is a free space where people can freely express their thoughts and opinions on the Internet without restrictions. Sharing: The Internet allows people to share their knowledge and experience, making knowledge more universal and shared. 4. Creation: The Internet provides more opportunities for people to create and start businesses. People can achieve more innovation and inventions through the Internet. Weakness of the Internet: Fake: The authenticity and credibility of online information are questioned. Some information may be processed and processed to lack authenticity. 2. Misleading: Information on the Internet spreads very quickly. Some information may be mistransmitted and misinterpreted to mislead people's judgments and decisions. 3. Invasion of privacy: The spread of online information may invade people's privacy and expose people's personal information. 4. Addiction: Overuse of the Internet may cause people to be addicted to the online world and affect their physical and mental health. To sum up, the network has many advantages and disadvantages. When using the network, we need to rationally view its advantages and disadvantages, make full use of its advantages and avoid its disadvantages, so as to better use the network to bring more value to our society and individuals.
We are going to have a debate. The topic of the debate is our own decision. I am the positive side. I need to ask a few questions to question the negative side. I am urgently asking for thanks.
As a positive, you can consider asking the following questions to question the negative: 1 What is "our youth is our own decision"? In this sentence, who should make this decision? What did this decision mean? If youth needs to make decisions, what should these decisions be like? Does it include immoral or inappropriate decisions? If a person can't make his own decision, then is there any meaning to his youth? Are there enough resources for everyone to make their own decisions? If so, where did these resources come from? If not, then why? Should a person be blamed or punished if he cannot make his own decisions? If so, was this accusation or punishment reasonable? 6. Do those who make their own decisions receive the respect and support they deserve? If so, why? If not, then why? Is there enough education and social training to help people make the right decisions? If so, where was the training conducted? If not, then why? If a person's youth is limited or deprived, does he still have the right to pursue his dreams and goals? If so, why? If not, then why? These questions can help you better understand the opposing side's point of view and arguments in order to better debate.
Debate competition, should a successful work make a sequel? We are the affirmative side, so we should make a sequel. Ask questions from the opposing side, the more the better.
Alright, I can provide you with some counter-questions. 1. If the sequels change the original core elements of a successful work, such as the plot, characters, or worldview, should these changes be accepted? If you have to accept changes, will these changes destroy the unique charm and value of a successful work? Does making two sequels mean disrespect to the previous work? If so, would this disrespect lead to misunderstanding and destruction of the previous work? Would a 3-star sequela lead to the commodification of the work and maximize the benefits? If so, would the real value of the work be weakened due to this kind of commerce and profit? Would four sequels lead to a time limit and limited creative space? If so, would this restriction lead to a decline in the quality of the work? Will the sequels cause the fan base of the work to split and lose? If so, would this division and loss lead to the true value of the work being weakened? I hope these questions will help you better understand the opposing side's point of view. Now, we can start a free debate. Please raise your views and questions.
In our debate competition, we were in the affirmative, and the topic was,"There must be a return for the effort." The opposing side's topic was,"There must be a return for the effort." How to distinguish the positive side
The affirmative side could debate around the following points: Contribution and return are closely related: there is a close relationship between contribution and return. Only by giving first can you expect to get a return. Whether it was in work, study, or personal life, we all need to put in effort and sweat before we can reap results and rewards. Therefore, in the debate, it can be emphasized that effort and reward are related. Only by putting in enough effort can you get the corresponding reward. The returns are usually visible: the returns between effort and return are usually visible. When we put in effort, we usually see the corresponding results and gains. For example, when we put in enough effort in work or study, we usually get rewards such as improvement and harvest. Therefore, it can be emphasized in the debate that the reward is usually visible, and only by putting in enough effort can you see the corresponding reward. 3. Contribution and return are proportional: Contribution and return are proportional. Our efforts and returns are usually proportional. Only by putting in enough effort can we get the corresponding returns. For example, when we put in enough effort at work, we usually get a higher position, better salary, and other rewards. Therefore, in the debate, it can be emphasized that effort and return are proportional. Only by putting in enough effort can you get the corresponding return. Success requires constant effort: the relationship between effort and return is constantly accumulating and sublimating. Only by constantly putting in effort could one continuously reap rewards. Success is not something that can be achieved overnight. It requires constant perseverance and hard work. Therefore, it can be emphasized in the debate that success requires constant effort. Only by putting in enough effort can you achieve continuous success. The above are some points that the positive side can revolve around. They can be freely developed and supplemented according to the specific situation and topic of the debate.
In the debate, we are the opposing side. The topic of debate is more likely to be affected by emotional factors. Help me find some information.
Emotional factors are more likely to affect success. You can refer to the following relevant papers and materials: 1 The Emotions and Emotional Intelligence by Daniel Goleman (2000): This article explored the relationship between emotional intelligence and success and pointed out the impact of emotional factors on success. 2 Emotions and Success by James D, Professor of Psychology, Richard A Berk (2013): This article introduced the role of emotional factors in success, including motivation, self-confidence, optimism and so on. 3 The Emotions and Your Life by Laurens (2016): This book explored the impact of emotional factors on personal life, including mental health, interpersonal relationships, careers, etc. 4 Emotions and Memory by B.F. Skinner (1943): This article introduced the influence of emotional factors on memory. It believes that emotions can affect the accuracy and durability of memory. 5 The Emotions and Success: A Guide for Entrepreneurs by Business Emotions a company dedicated to the study of emotions and business (2018): This article provides advice for successful entrepreneurs on how to manage emotional factors and how to better use emotional factors to promote success.
Our school is holding a debate competition. Is ability or education more important? We are the ones who are more important. We are looking for an opening self-introduction, something humorous.
Respected judges, dear audience, hello! I'm a high school student from XX school who likes to write novels. Although I don't have a high degree, I have a heart that loves writing. I believe that ability is more important than education because only practical experience can really help us go further on the road of life. Of course, education was also very important. It can give us more opportunities to show our abilities and allow us to have better development in the workplace. But if we don't have real ability, even if we have a high degree, it won't help. Therefore, only through continuous learning and practice can we cultivate the true ability to make ourselves more successful on the road of life. I believe that having both ability and education will allow us to complete the journey of life better. Thank you, everyone!
In the debate competition, which was more important in life, opportunity or hard work? I'm in favor of opportunities being more important than hard work. What questions can we ask? The more the better.
As a positive side, opportunities are more important than hard work, you can ask the following questions: Are all opportunities equal in life? If so, why are some people able to seize opportunities and others unable to? Which is more important, opportunity or effort? Can you make different judgments in different situations? For example, for an entrepreneur, he needed to seize opportunities to create opportunities for success. For an ordinary employee, he only needed to work hard to obtain a stable income. Which is easier to obtain, opportunity or hard work? If so, why do some people easily seize opportunities while others don't? In the face of uncertainty, can opportunities be more important than hard work? For example, if the market feedback is not good during the development of a new product, should we rely more on opportunities rather than hard work? Will those who do not seize the opportunity lose anything? If they didn't seize the opportunity, would they have other choices? Which is easier to be controlled by others, opportunity or effort? If so, why are some people able to seize opportunities and others unable to? Will all opportunities appear equally in everyone's life? If so, why do some people encounter opportunities many times while others only have one? Are those who can seize opportunities more likely to succeed? If so, why? These questions could help to better understand which was more important, opportunity or hard work, and at the same time, better explain one's own point of view.
In the debate competition, our side's point of view is more harmful than beneficial to the unification of history. How to refute the other side's "
First of all, we need to make it clear that the purpose of the debate is not to refute the other party's point of view, but to convince the other party to accept our point of view. Therefore, before refuting the other party's point of view, we need to think about how to better express our point of view. If the other party thinks that jokes do more harm than good to the spread of history, we can refute it from the following aspects: Jokes could allow people to understand history more deeply. Joking not only allowed people to understand the background and details of historical events, but also allowed people to understand the views and attitudes of different figures in historical events, so as to better understand the evolution of historical figures and historical events. Joking could improve people's cultural quality. History is an important part of culture, and jokes can be used as an interesting form of cultural expression to let people better understand and understand history and culture. Jokes could enrich people's entertainment life. Although historical events were important, they were often boring. Joking could be used as a form of entertainment to let people understand historical events in a relaxed atmosphere and improve their quality of life. To sum up, we can come to the conclusion that although the joke may bring some negative effects, it plays an important role in the popularity of history. It can make people have a deeper understanding of history, improve cultural quality and enrich their entertainment life. Therefore, I think the joke has more disadvantages than advantages for the popularity of history.