In the debate, I was the opposing side. The college students participating in volunteer activities focused on training. Ask for a debate topic.

2024-09-18 06:01

1 answer

2024-09-18 06:07

College students participating in volunteer activities focused on training. On the contrary, it could be argued that college students participating in volunteer activities could not directly train their personal abilities, but might waste time and resources. Here are some possible counterarguments: 1. volunteer activities may affect college students 'studies. If college students participated in volunteer activities too frequently, it might take up their time and cause them to be unable to concentrate on their studies. Moreover, volunteer activities usually required a long time to participate in, which would have a certain negative impact on the health of college students. 2. volunteer activities do not provide practical work experience for college students. Although volunteer activities could cultivate college students 'sense of social responsibility and teamwork, these experiences could not be directly converted into professional experience. For most college students, their main goal was to find a job after graduation. Therefore, volunteer activities were not a necessary step in their career planning. 3. volunteer activities can't improve the academic performance of college students. Although volunteer activities can help students build a good sense of community and social responsibility, they can't directly improve students 'academic performance. Many college students participate in volunteer activities to find a better job after graduation rather than to enrich their studies. 4. The voluntary activities can't improve the professional skills of college students. Although volunteer activities can help students develop their leadership and teamwork skills, they cannot directly improve their professional skills. For many college students, they need to learn professional knowledge in school in order to find a better job after graduation. Therefore, volunteer activities were not a necessary step for them to improve their skills.

In the college debate competition, the topic of debate was whether the college students 'major choice should be based on their personal interests or their future. I am the opposing side, seeking freedom to debate the problem,

1 answer

2024-09-18 06:04

The opposing side's second defense is very grateful for the free debate question you provided. Here are some possible questions for your reference: Is it necessary to balance personal interests and professional prospects? If you have to make a choice, which factor do you think should be prioritized? Should personal interests be excluded when choosing a major? If you have to make a choice, which major do you think you should prioritize your personal interests? 3. How to ensure that students don't lose their motivation for majors that have no obvious interest? How to encourage students to pursue their interests while also considering their future employment prospects? Should students who are interested but have poor job prospects choose this major? If students choose this major, will they succeed? Should students 'personal background and adaptability be taken into account when choosing a major? If students don't have enough background and adaptability, can they adapt to the new major?

Should primary school students chase after stars (I'm the opposing side in the debate)

1 answer

2024-09-22 05:21

It was a complicated question whether primary school students should chase after celebrities because it involved personal values, family education methods, social environment, and many other aspects. From the point of view of chasing stars, primary school students chasing stars might have some negative effects on their physical and mental health. Chasing idols often required a lot of time and energy to understand their lives, work, and love stories. This could lead to a decline in primary school students 'academic performance, difficulty concentrating, and even affect their daily lives. In addition, some primary school students might have conflicts with their parents because they chased after stars, thinking that they were isolated and did not understand. On the other hand, chasing after celebrities could also be an active lifestyle. Primary school students could improve their artistic and aesthetic standards by paying attention to their idols 'music, movies, and variety shows. It could also help them cultivate good interpersonal relationships and social skills. Chasing stars could also make primary school students feel happy and satisfied because they could feel the common interests and identity between themselves and other fans. In summary, whether primary school students should chase after stars needed to be judged according to the specific situation. If parents allowed and supported primary school students to chase after celebrities, and chasing after celebrities could also bring positive effects, then chasing after celebrities might be acceptable for primary school students. However, if the parents object or do not support the primary school students chasing stars, or if chasing stars has a negative impact on the primary school students 'studies, physical and mental health, then the primary school students should avoid chasing stars.

Regarding the debate on whether high school students should fall in love, I'm on the opposing side.

1 answer

2024-09-13 20:11

On the contrary, high school students shouldn't be in love. Here are some materials that support this view: 1. Falling in love will have a negative impact on learning. High school students were in the middle of learning important knowledge. Falling in love could distract them and cause their academic performance to drop. 2. Love can lead to emotional problems. It was normal for high school students to have emotional problems during puberty. However, if the relationship is unhealthy, it may lead to emotional problems affecting their mental health. 3. Love might affect their future development. High school students should focus on their studies so that they could have a good future. Falling in love might distract them and cause their studies to decline, affecting their future development. Love may affect their image. High school students were educated in school, and their image was also the image of the school. If their relationship was seen by other students, it might affect their image and their status in school. Love may affect their social relationships. High school students should focus on their studies so that they can have a good social relationship in the future. If their relationship was seen by other students, it might affect their social relationships and their future opportunities.

High school students didn't have to do homework, debate, and argue with the opposing side!

1 answer

2024-09-13 20:27

The opposing side of the debate competition where high school students did not have to do homework was as follows: First of all, we need to clarify the meaning and value of doing homework. Doing homework was to help students consolidate and deepen their understanding of what they had learned, improve their academic performance, and improve their competitiveness. At the same time, doing homework was also to help students master the necessary knowledge and skills to lay a solid foundation for future studies and career development. However, under certain circumstances, we can consider not doing homework. For example, the student had already mastered the content, or the student had other important things to deal with, or the student felt that he did not need to do homework to consolidate and deepen his understanding. In this case, we can say that high school students don't need to do homework every weekend or holiday. But we also need to be aware that not doing homework may have a negative impact on students 'learning and growth. For example, not doing homework might cause students to be unable to master the necessary knowledge and skills, affecting their future studies and career development. In addition, not doing homework may cause students to lack the ability to think independently and solve problems, unable to adapt to future learning and work needs. Therefore, we believe that high school students should not do homework every weekend or during the holidays under appropriate circumstances, but they need to maintain the state and habit of learning to deepen their understanding and grasp knowledge through independent learning and thinking.

In the debate competition, our side's topic is that there is real friendship on the Internet. I urgently need the opposing side's topic (there is no real friendship on the Internet).

1 answer

2024-09-18 06:10

Opposite side: There is no true friendship on the Internet. Although online friendships were not as intuitive and easy to feel as face-to-face friendships, online friendships could also have real friendships. Online friendships required mutual trust and respect, as well as a willingness to maintain relative privacy and caution on the Internet. Although online communication may not be as direct and real-time as face-to-face communication, both parties can maintain contact through text, voice, video and other means to share each other's lives and emotions, which can also establish a true friendship. Online friendships could also be built on social relationships in the virtual world. Although this relationship may not be as close and deep as the friendship in real life, it can also be a real friendship because both parties can communicate, support and encourage each other in the virtual world to establish an emotional bond similar to family or friendship. Although there might be some misunderstandings, distrust, and contradictions in online friendships, this did not mean that there were no real friendships on the Internet. As long as both parties were willing to maintain caution and respect, and were willing to seek understanding and communication on the Internet, they could establish a true friendship. Therefore, we should not simply regard online friendships as a kind of "fake" friendship, but should realize that online friendships can also have real feelings and meanings.

As the opposing debater, the topic of debate was that starting a business depended on the individual. Who had good debate opinions, methods, or materials?

1 answer

2024-09-17 01:19

As the opposing debater, starting a business from a personal point of view could be debated from the following aspects: 1. The advantages of individual entrepreneurs: Individual entrepreneurs usually have stronger innovative thinking and flexibility to adapt to market changes and customer needs faster. In addition, they had more time and energy to think about business and solve problems, which made it easier for them to succeed. 2. The risk of personal business: There is a certain risk in personal business because the entrepreneur needs to bear all the responsibilities and risks. Moreover, entrepreneurs needed to have enough experience and skills to deal with all kinds of challenges and difficulties. 3. Restrictions on individual entrepreneurs: Although individual entrepreneurs have the ability to be innovative and flexible, they also face some restrictions such as capital, talent, market channels, etc. In addition, individual entrepreneurs also needed to consider legal and tax risks. The importance of teamwork: Starting a business is not a solo fight. Teamwork is very important. An entrepreneur needed to establish a close working relationship with team members, suppliers, and customers to achieve their goals together. 5. Learning and reference on the road of starting a business: Individual entrepreneurs can continuously improve their own ability and management level by referring to other successful enterprises and learning from their successful experiences and failures. The above are some of the opinions and methods of personal business. Of course, there are many other angles that can be discussed. Finally, it should be emphasized that the success of a business depends on a variety of factors. Individual entrepreneurs need to choose the appropriate methods and strategies to start a business according to their own situation and actual situation.

The classic argument of the opposing side in the online pros and cons debate competition

1 answer

2024-09-09 12:14

Network pros and cons As a modern communication tool, the Internet provided a convenient and fast way for people to communicate. The benefits of the internet included: 1. The Internet allows us to obtain information more easily. Through the network, we can access all kinds of information resources, including news, articles, videos, etc., anytime and anywhere. Moreover, these contents can be shared on various platforms, making the information more diverse and rich. The Internet can also help us learn and educate better. Through the internet, we can access various online courses, learning resources, library materials, etc., so that we can have a deeper understanding of various knowledge fields to improve our learning ability and level. The internet also provides us with more entertainment. Through the internet, we can access all kinds of videos, games, social media, etc. to enrich our entertainment life. However, there were also some negative effects of the Internet. The internet could also lead to the spread of false information. Through the internet, we can access all kinds of information, but this information may come from unreliable sources, which will cause us to receive wrong information and affect our judgment and decision-making. 2. The Internet could also lead to the leakage of personal privacy. Through the internet, we can easily access all kinds of sensitive personal information such as home address, phone number, etc., which may lead to the risk of personal information leakage. The internet could also lead to the spread of violence and hate speech. Through the internet, we can come into contact with all kinds of extreme speech and violence, which may have a negative impact on society. To sum up, the internet is a tool with both positive and negative effects. We need to use and manage the network correctly to maximize its advantages and avoid its negative effects.

I'm going to participate in the debate tomorrow. I'm the opposing side. The topic of the debate is that the information on the Internet is not credible! I need a lot of materials. I hope everyone can help.

1 answer

2024-09-18 05:56

The credibility of information on the Internet was a very complicated problem because it involved the reliability of the source of the information, the accuracy of the information, the authenticity of the information, and many other aspects. Here is some information that might be useful to you: The reliability of information sources: There are many sources of information on the Internet, including search engines, news websites, social media, forums, and so on. However, the reliability of these sources is not necessarily the same because they may be affected by political, commercial, cultural and other factors. Therefore, when judging whether the information on the Internet was credible, the reliability of the information source needed to be considered. The accuracy of the information: There is a lot of information on the Internet, many of which are unverified or subjective. Therefore, the accuracy of the information on the Internet needed to be considered when judging whether it was credible. News, social media, and other time-sensitive information needed to be closely monitored to avoid being misled. The authenticity of the information: The information on the Internet may also contain false information. This information may have been deliberately fabricated, forged, or based on inaccurate sources. Therefore, the authenticity of the information on the Internet needed to be considered when judging whether it was credible or not. The value of information: Although the information on the Internet may contain false information and inaccurate information, if the content of the information is valuable, it can still have a positive impact on people. Therefore, the value of the information on the Internet needed to be considered when judging whether it was credible or not. This is some information that might be useful to you. Of course, the materials needed for the debate might include how to analyze the reliability and accuracy of online information, how to identify false information, how to evaluate the value of information, and so on. If you need more detailed help, I suggest you consult your debate instructor or coach.

Should middle school students read romance novels? A debate organized by the school. The opposing side should not. Urgent.

1 answer

2024-09-24 04:16

Romance novels usually referred to literary works that described romance, love, and emotional entanglements. They were more popular among middle school students. The debate organized by the school on whether the opposing side should read romance novels could be based on the following points: Some fictional plots and characters often appear in romance novels, which have a negative impact on the study and life of middle school students. The love plots in romance novels were often superficial and could not really reflect the values and values of love in real life. In addition, romance novels tended to divert the time and energy of middle school students, causing them to be unable to study seriously and do other things well. Romance novels can improve the literary quality and aesthetic ability of middle school students. The delicate emotions and beautiful language described in some romance novels can stimulate the interest of middle school students in literature and love and improve their literary level and aesthetic ability. So I think middle school students can read some romance novels appropriately, but they should control the time and frequency of reading, study hard and do other things well. Of course, for some parents and teachers, they might think that middle school students should spend more time and energy on studies and sports instead of reading some illusory romance novels.

The opposing side's argument about the debate on "Should middle school students care about current politics?"

1 answer

2024-09-13 20:09

The opposing side of the debate on whether middle school students should care about current politics might include the following: Middle school students should be concerned about current affairs but should not be overly concerned. The content of current politics is very broad, including politics, economy, culture, society and so on. For middle school students, early exposure to too professional terms and content may bring them learning difficulties. At the same time, paying too much attention to current affairs would also cause unnecessary anxiety and stress for middle school students, which was not conducive to their healthy growth. Middle school students should be concerned about current politics but should not blindly follow and support certain political views. On the basis of understanding different political views and positions, middle school students can cultivate their own thinking and thinking ability, better understand the world and themselves, and also help them form correct values and worldviews. However, blindly following and supporting certain political views would bring about negative effects, such as social instability and division. Middle school students should care about current affairs because they are the future pillars of the country. Understanding and paying attention to current politics can help middle school students better adapt to the future social development and contribute to the country's construction and development. However, if you only regard caring about current politics as a way of political participation and ignore the importance of learning itself, you will miss the opportunity and potential of development.