In our debate competition, we were in the affirmative, and the topic was,"There must be a return for the effort." The opposing side's topic was,"There must be a return for the effort." How to distinguish the positive side
The affirmative side could debate around the following points: Contribution and return are closely related: there is a close relationship between contribution and return. Only by giving first can you expect to get a return. Whether it was in work, study, or personal life, we all need to put in effort and sweat before we can reap results and rewards. Therefore, in the debate, it can be emphasized that effort and reward are related. Only by putting in enough effort can you get the corresponding reward. The returns are usually visible: the returns between effort and return are usually visible. When we put in effort, we usually see the corresponding results and gains. For example, when we put in enough effort in work or study, we usually get rewards such as improvement and harvest. Therefore, it can be emphasized in the debate that the reward is usually visible, and only by putting in enough effort can you see the corresponding reward. 3. Contribution and return are proportional: Contribution and return are proportional. Our efforts and returns are usually proportional. Only by putting in enough effort can we get the corresponding returns. For example, when we put in enough effort at work, we usually get a higher position, better salary, and other rewards. Therefore, in the debate, it can be emphasized that effort and return are proportional. Only by putting in enough effort can you get the corresponding return. Success requires constant effort: the relationship between effort and return is constantly accumulating and sublimating. Only by constantly putting in effort could one continuously reap rewards. Success is not something that can be achieved overnight. It requires constant perseverance and hard work. Therefore, it can be emphasized in the debate that success requires constant effort. Only by putting in enough effort can you achieve continuous success. The above are some points that the positive side can revolve around. They can be freely developed and supplemented according to the specific situation and topic of the debate.
In the debate, we are the affirmative side, and the topic is a toy. Is there any good point of view or material to support this argument?
The argument that playthings are ambitious can be based on the following points and materials: 1. The concept of "toys with ambition" means that people should appreciate and pursue the value and meaning of toys instead of just treating them as entertainment tools. This view emphasized the role of toys in developing people's personality, intelligence, and emotions. Some literary works such as Dream of the Red Chamber and Water Margins also emphasized the importance of toys in Chinese traditional culture. In these works, toys were regarded as living objects with unique value and meaning, which could cultivate people's emotions and creativity. In modern society, toys also play an increasingly important role. For example, some toys could stimulate people's creativity and imagination, develop intelligence, and promote social interaction. Some toys could also be used as souvenirs to leave good memories for people. The idea of playing with toys can also be compared with playing with toys. If a person only treated toys as entertainment tools and did not pursue the value and meaning of toys, then it was possible to lose the motivation to move forward and become lazy and passive. On the contrary, if a person could gain value and meaning from toys, stimulate creativity and imagination, then it was possible to achieve greater achievements. The above are some of the views and materials that support the plaything Shang Zhi that can be used in the debate.
In the debate, we are the opposing side. The topic of debate is more likely to be affected by emotional factors. Help me find some information.
Emotional factors are more likely to affect success. You can refer to the following relevant papers and materials: 1 The Emotions and Emotional Intelligence by Daniel Goleman (2000): This article explored the relationship between emotional intelligence and success and pointed out the impact of emotional factors on success. 2 Emotions and Success by James D, Professor of Psychology, Richard A Berk (2013): This article introduced the role of emotional factors in success, including motivation, self-confidence, optimism and so on. 3 The Emotions and Your Life by Laurens (2016): This book explored the impact of emotional factors on personal life, including mental health, interpersonal relationships, careers, etc. 4 Emotions and Memory by B.F. Skinner (1943): This article introduced the influence of emotional factors on memory. It believes that emotions can affect the accuracy and durability of memory. 5 The Emotions and Success: A Guide for Entrepreneurs by Business Emotions a company dedicated to the study of emotions and business (2018): This article provides advice for successful entrepreneurs on how to manage emotional factors and how to better use emotional factors to promote success.
We're going to hold a debate. We're in the affirmative. The topic is: We're getting closer to the truth in today's information explosion. The opposing side was getting further and further away.
The information explosion has indeed greatly improved the ability of humans to obtain and process information. We can learn more facts and truths through a large amount of information. In this case, we are getting closer to the truth and can find the truth faster and make the right decision. However, the information explosion also brought some negative effects. Due to the amount of information we receive, some truths may be covered up or misunderstood. We need to spend more time and effort to filter and confirm the information to ensure that the information we obtain is accurate and credible. Therefore, even though the information explosion has brought us closer and closer to the truth, we still need to be cautious and suspicious, and constantly verify and confirm to avoid being misled by false information.
In the debate, I was the opposing side. The college students participating in volunteer activities focused on training. Ask for a debate topic.
College students participating in volunteer activities focused on training. On the contrary, it could be argued that college students participating in volunteer activities could not directly train their personal abilities, but might waste time and resources. Here are some possible counterarguments: 1. volunteer activities may affect college students 'studies. If college students participated in volunteer activities too frequently, it might take up their time and cause them to be unable to concentrate on their studies. Moreover, volunteer activities usually required a long time to participate in, which would have a certain negative impact on the health of college students. 2. volunteer activities do not provide practical work experience for college students. Although volunteer activities could cultivate college students 'sense of social responsibility and teamwork, these experiences could not be directly converted into professional experience. For most college students, their main goal was to find a job after graduation. Therefore, volunteer activities were not a necessary step in their career planning. 3. volunteer activities can't improve the academic performance of college students. Although volunteer activities can help students build a good sense of community and social responsibility, they can't directly improve students 'academic performance. Many college students participate in volunteer activities to find a better job after graduation rather than to enrich their studies. 4. The voluntary activities can't improve the professional skills of college students. Although volunteer activities can help students develop their leadership and teamwork skills, they cannot directly improve their professional skills. For many college students, they need to learn professional knowledge in school in order to find a better job after graduation. Therefore, volunteer activities were not a necessary step for them to improve their skills.
Now, we are going to have a debate competition. The negative side's debate topic is more important for the creative ability of the work of art. The positive side's inspiration for the creation of the work of art is more important. We are the negative side.
The ability to create works of art is more important. The positive side is the inspiration for the creation of works of art is more important. We are the negative side. We can refer to the following arguments that the negative side debater might make: 1. Creation inspiration can be crammed up at the last minute, but creation ability is the result of long-term accumulation. If you only have creative inspiration but no creative ability, then the work may lack depth and content. It's just simple plagiarism or imitation. If one only had the ability to create without inspiration, they might fall into the quagmire of plagiarism or imitation. Therefore, creative ability was more important than inspiration. 2. The ability to create can be cultivated, but inspiration can come from accumulation. If we can continue to learn, think and practice, we can cultivate our own creative ability. However, if one only had creative inspiration and no creative ability, they might lack creativity and competitiveness, making it difficult for them to stand out in the art market. Therefore, creative ability was more important than inspiration. 3. The creative ability can be measured, but the creative inspiration cannot. We can evaluate the creative ability of a work of art in various ways, such as evaluating its technique, content, style, and so on. And if we only have inspiration, we can't measure the value of a work by the same standard. Therefore, creative ability was more important than inspiration. 4. The ability to create can affect the value of a work of art, while inspiration can determine the direction and style of the work. An artist with creative ability might show different styles and characteristics in different works. However, if one only had creative inspiration, they might fall into a single creative style and it would be difficult to produce unique artistic value. Therefore, creative ability was more important than inspiration. These arguments can be used as the opposing debater's point of view in the debate, but it should be noted that the debate is not only a simple statement of the point of view, but also through logic, evidence and examples to support their point of view in order to win the game.
Debate competition, should a successful work make a sequel? We are the affirmative side, so we should make a sequel. Ask questions from the opposing side, the more the better.
Alright, I can provide you with some counter-questions. 1. If the sequels change the original core elements of a successful work, such as the plot, characters, or worldview, should these changes be accepted? If you have to accept changes, will these changes destroy the unique charm and value of a successful work? Does making two sequels mean disrespect to the previous work? If so, would this disrespect lead to misunderstanding and destruction of the previous work? Would a 3-star sequela lead to the commodification of the work and maximize the benefits? If so, would the real value of the work be weakened due to this kind of commerce and profit? Would four sequels lead to a time limit and limited creative space? If so, would this restriction lead to a decline in the quality of the work? Will the sequels cause the fan base of the work to split and lose? If so, would this division and loss lead to the true value of the work being weakened? I hope these questions will help you better understand the opposing side's point of view. Now, we can start a free debate. Please raise your views and questions.
The classic argument of the opposing side in the online pros and cons debate competition
Network pros and cons As a modern communication tool, the Internet provided a convenient and fast way for people to communicate. The benefits of the internet included: 1. The Internet allows us to obtain information more easily. Through the network, we can access all kinds of information resources, including news, articles, videos, etc., anytime and anywhere. Moreover, these contents can be shared on various platforms, making the information more diverse and rich. The Internet can also help us learn and educate better. Through the internet, we can access various online courses, learning resources, library materials, etc., so that we can have a deeper understanding of various knowledge fields to improve our learning ability and level. The internet also provides us with more entertainment. Through the internet, we can access all kinds of videos, games, social media, etc. to enrich our entertainment life. However, there were also some negative effects of the Internet. The internet could also lead to the spread of false information. Through the internet, we can access all kinds of information, but this information may come from unreliable sources, which will cause us to receive wrong information and affect our judgment and decision-making. 2. The Internet could also lead to the leakage of personal privacy. Through the internet, we can easily access all kinds of sensitive personal information such as home address, phone number, etc., which may lead to the risk of personal information leakage. The internet could also lead to the spread of violence and hate speech. Through the internet, we can come into contact with all kinds of extreme speech and violence, which may have a negative impact on society. To sum up, the internet is a tool with both positive and negative effects. We need to use and manage the network correctly to maximize its advantages and avoid its negative effects.
Urgently request four statements! We're on the opposing side. The topic of debate is that the use of online language is a step back in the development of literature.
Respected judges, dear opposing students: Hello everyone, I'm XXX. Today, as the representative of the opposition, I've prepared a wonderful debate for everyone. Our debate topic is that the use of online language is a step backward in the development of literature. As the opposing party, we will explain our views to everyone. First of all, we need to clarify the definition of online language. Cyber jargon referred to the various languages that were popular on the Internet, such as catchphrases, internet catchphrases, and so on. These terms were usually used by some internet celebrities. Although the usage of internet slang in the field of literature is getting higher and higher, it is not a form of literature but a form of popular culture. Secondly, we need to look at the positive impact of online language on the development of literature. Online language was usually concise and vivid, allowing readers to understand and feel the meaning of literary works more quickly. For example, some online catchphrases could be used at the beginning of a novel to attract the reader's attention and make the reader more engrossed in the reading. In addition, online language could also bring more exposure to literary works, increase the sales and popularity of the works, and play a positive role in promoting the development of the literary industry. However, we can't ignore the negative impact of online language on the development of literature. Online language is usually irresponsible language such as vulgar, erotic, violent, etc. These languages often appear on the Internet and have a negative impact on literature. Some online slang spread very quickly and could even spread to the entire literary world, bringing serious negative effects to literary works. For example, some of the network language caused some literary works to lose their original value and content and become some vulgar, erotic, and violent carriers, which was detrimental to the development of literature. To sum up, although the use of online language has a certain positive impact on the development of literature, it has also brought a lot of negative effects. The spread of online language was very fast. Some irresponsible language often appeared on the Internet, which had a negative impact on literature. Therefore, I think the use of online language is a step backward in the development of literature.
In the college debate competition, the topic of debate was whether the college students 'major choice should be based on their personal interests or their future. I am the opposing side, seeking freedom to debate the problem,
The opposing side's second defense is very grateful for the free debate question you provided. Here are some possible questions for your reference: Is it necessary to balance personal interests and professional prospects? If you have to make a choice, which factor do you think should be prioritized? Should personal interests be excluded when choosing a major? If you have to make a choice, which major do you think you should prioritize your personal interests? 3. How to ensure that students don't lose their motivation for majors that have no obvious interest? How to encourage students to pursue their interests while also considering their future employment prospects? Should students who are interested but have poor job prospects choose this major? If students choose this major, will they succeed? Should students 'personal background and adaptability be taken into account when choosing a major? If students don't have enough background and adaptability, can they adapt to the new major?
We are going to have a debate. The topic of the debate is our own decision. I am the positive side. I need to ask a few questions to question the negative side. I am urgently asking for thanks.
As a positive, you can consider asking the following questions to question the negative: 1 What is "our youth is our own decision"? In this sentence, who should make this decision? What did this decision mean? If youth needs to make decisions, what should these decisions be like? Does it include immoral or inappropriate decisions? If a person can't make his own decision, then is there any meaning to his youth? Are there enough resources for everyone to make their own decisions? If so, where did these resources come from? If not, then why? Should a person be blamed or punished if he cannot make his own decisions? If so, was this accusation or punishment reasonable? 6. Do those who make their own decisions receive the respect and support they deserve? If so, why? If not, then why? Is there enough education and social training to help people make the right decisions? If so, where was the training conducted? If not, then why? If a person's youth is limited or deprived, does he still have the right to pursue his dreams and goals? If so, why? If not, then why? These questions can help you better understand the opposing side's point of view and arguments in order to better debate.