In the debate competition, our side's point of view is more harmful than beneficial to the unification of history. How to refute the other side's "
First of all, we need to make it clear that the purpose of the debate is not to refute the other party's point of view, but to convince the other party to accept our point of view. Therefore, before refuting the other party's point of view, we need to think about how to better express our point of view. If the other party thinks that jokes do more harm than good to the spread of history, we can refute it from the following aspects: Jokes could allow people to understand history more deeply. Joking not only allowed people to understand the background and details of historical events, but also allowed people to understand the views and attitudes of different figures in historical events, so as to better understand the evolution of historical figures and historical events. Joking could improve people's cultural quality. History is an important part of culture, and jokes can be used as an interesting form of cultural expression to let people better understand and understand history and culture. Jokes could enrich people's entertainment life. Although historical events were important, they were often boring. Joking could be used as a form of entertainment to let people understand historical events in a relaxed atmosphere and improve their quality of life. To sum up, we can come to the conclusion that although the joke may bring some negative effects, it plays an important role in the popularity of history. It can make people have a deeper understanding of history, improve cultural quality and enrich their entertainment life. Therefore, I think the joke has more disadvantages than advantages for the popularity of history.
Urgently looking for an imposing opening speech for the debate! Our point of view is that the development of the internet is more beneficial than harmful to literature!
Dear judges and audience, Today, we are here to have a debate about the development of online literature. We firmly believe that the development of the Internet has more advantages than disadvantages for literature. The development of network technology brought a broader space for the development of literature. As an emerging form, online literature not only satisfied the diverse needs of readers, but also provided more inspiration and creativity for literary creation. The online literature platform allowed authors to freely create and publish, breaking the restrictions on the publication and circulation of traditional literature, providing more possibilities for the development of literature. The development of internet technology had also brought more readers to literature. As a new form of media, online literature was receiving more and more attention and promotion. Through the online literature platform, readers could read the latest novel content anytime, anywhere, and interact with the author. This made literature no longer a high and mighty field, but could be shared and experienced with more people. Of course, the development of network technology also brought about some negative effects. The emergence of online literature made it easier for some indecent content to spread on the Internet. The development of network technology has also led to the decline of traditional literature. Many readers choose to read literary works through the Internet instead of going to the library or bookstore. We need to pay attention to these problems and solve them. To sum up, the development of the Internet had more advantages than disadvantages for literature. As a new form of media, online literature brought more possibilities and opportunities for the development of literature. We believe that in the development of online literature, we should pay attention to protecting the intellectual property rights of literature, strengthen the management and supervision of online literature platforms, and also strengthen the quality and education of readers to make online literature an important way to spread positive energy and values.
Debate: The development of the Internet is more beneficial than harmful to literature
Dear judges and audience, what I'm going to bring today is the view that the development of the Internet has more advantages than disadvantages for literature. First of all, we need to make it clear that the development of the Internet has more advantages than disadvantages for literature. The development of network technology had brought many new opportunities to literature. As a new form of literature, online literature was not limited by time and place, allowing more people to have the opportunity to read literary works. The development of network technology also provided a more convenient way for the spread of literary works, allowing literary works to spread more widely. Secondly, the development of the Internet had more advantages than disadvantages for literature. The development of network technology has provided a broader platform for literary creation and research, promoting the innovation and development of literature. The continuous emergence of new literary schools and works on the online literature platform attracted more readers 'attention and participation in literary activities. Finally, the development of the internet had more advantages than disadvantages for literature, which was reflected in the regulation and guidance of literature. The development of network technology has provided more open and free development space for literature, and at the same time, it has also provided more creative inspiration and ideas for literary practitioners. The development of network technology made the literary industry more standardized and standardized, providing better protection for the development and inheritance of literature. To sum up, the development of network technology has brought many opportunities and challenges to literature, but at the same time, it has also played a positive role in promoting literature. The development of the Internet has more advantages than disadvantages for literature. We should support and promote the development of online literature more actively and make it an important part of the development of literature.
The negative side of pop songs was greater than the positive side. This is our school's debate competition. We need to debate the views. Everyone should be more enthusiastic and get extra points.
The negative effects of pop songs mainly included: Air Pollution: Many pop songs are accompanied by intense drumming and singing. This music may produce noise and pollute the air. 2. Affects mental health: pop songs may cause listeners to get excited and lose control of their emotions, especially at night or when they are alone. These types of music can have a negative impact on mental health. 3. Waste of resources: Many popular songs need to be purchased or downloaded, which will lead to a waste of resources. In addition, the spread of popular songs could also lead to copyright issues. However, pop songs also had positive effects. 1. Promotion of cultural exchange: pop songs are an important part of cultural exchange. They can help people better understand and appreciate different music and cultures across cultural differences and language barriers. 2. Stimulate creativity: Many popular songs are created by independent musicians and artists. This music inspires people's creativity and imagination, which has promoted the development of the music industry. 3. Stimulating consumption: pop songs can motivate listeners to buy goods and digital products to promote economic development. To sum up, pop songs had both negative and positive effects. It was a complicated question whether popular songs should be restricted or banned, which required a comprehensive consideration of various factors.
Debate competition materials, positive side: doing is more important than saying; Negative side: saying is more important than doing.
The theme of this debate was about the importance of doing and talking. The positive side believed that doing was more important than talking, while the negative side believed that talking was more important than doing. Affirmative point of view: actions are more important than words. Because doing was a practical action that could bring direct and practical benefits. When we make a decision or action, we are actually responsible for it and trying to achieve it. Only when we put our ideas and beliefs into action can we prove that they are correct. In contrast, verbal expressions could not bring about actual changes. Opposite point of view: Saying is more important than doing. This was because it allowed people to express their thoughts and opinions, thereby arousing the resonance and support of others. By speaking, we can pass on information and knowledge to help others better understand our views and beliefs. In addition, it can also bring certain social benefits, allowing us to establish connections and interactions with others. The outcome of this debate depended on the opinions and arguments of both parties. In the end, it had to be judged based on facts and logic. Both sides needed to provide sufficient evidence and reasons to convince the audience.
Is reading extra-cursory books more beneficial than harmful, or more harmful than beneficial?
The advantages of reading extra-cursory books outweighed the disadvantages. Reading extra-cursory books can help people broaden their horizons, increase their knowledge, and improve their thinking and language skills. Through reading novels, history books, philosophy books and other types of extra-cursory books, people can understand different stories and characters and learn different ideas and values. This knowledge could not only enrich people's lives but also improve their overall quality. Of course, there were some negative effects of reading extra-cursory books. Some people might be so engrossed in the world of books that they neglect important things in real life. Others may be negatively affected by reading unhealthy books, resulting in physical and mental health problems. Therefore, he needed to pay attention to balance when reading extra-cursory books.
Now, we are going to have a debate competition. The negative side's debate topic is more important for the creative ability of the work of art. The positive side's inspiration for the creation of the work of art is more important. We are the negative side.
The ability to create works of art is more important. The positive side is the inspiration for the creation of works of art is more important. We are the negative side. We can refer to the following arguments that the negative side debater might make: 1. Creation inspiration can be crammed up at the last minute, but creation ability is the result of long-term accumulation. If you only have creative inspiration but no creative ability, then the work may lack depth and content. It's just simple plagiarism or imitation. If one only had the ability to create without inspiration, they might fall into the quagmire of plagiarism or imitation. Therefore, creative ability was more important than inspiration. 2. The ability to create can be cultivated, but inspiration can come from accumulation. If we can continue to learn, think and practice, we can cultivate our own creative ability. However, if one only had creative inspiration and no creative ability, they might lack creativity and competitiveness, making it difficult for them to stand out in the art market. Therefore, creative ability was more important than inspiration. 3. The creative ability can be measured, but the creative inspiration cannot. We can evaluate the creative ability of a work of art in various ways, such as evaluating its technique, content, style, and so on. And if we only have inspiration, we can't measure the value of a work by the same standard. Therefore, creative ability was more important than inspiration. 4. The ability to create can affect the value of a work of art, while inspiration can determine the direction and style of the work. An artist with creative ability might show different styles and characteristics in different works. However, if one only had creative inspiration, they might fall into a single creative style and it would be difficult to produce unique artistic value. Therefore, creative ability was more important than inspiration. These arguments can be used as the opposing debater's point of view in the debate, but it should be noted that the debate is not only a simple statement of the point of view, but also through logic, evidence and examples to support their point of view in order to win the game.
In our debate competition, we were in the affirmative, and the topic was,"There must be a return for the effort." The opposing side's topic was,"There must be a return for the effort." How to distinguish the positive side
The affirmative side could debate around the following points: Contribution and return are closely related: there is a close relationship between contribution and return. Only by giving first can you expect to get a return. Whether it was in work, study, or personal life, we all need to put in effort and sweat before we can reap results and rewards. Therefore, in the debate, it can be emphasized that effort and reward are related. Only by putting in enough effort can you get the corresponding reward. The returns are usually visible: the returns between effort and return are usually visible. When we put in effort, we usually see the corresponding results and gains. For example, when we put in enough effort in work or study, we usually get rewards such as improvement and harvest. Therefore, it can be emphasized in the debate that the reward is usually visible, and only by putting in enough effort can you see the corresponding reward. 3. Contribution and return are proportional: Contribution and return are proportional. Our efforts and returns are usually proportional. Only by putting in enough effort can we get the corresponding returns. For example, when we put in enough effort at work, we usually get a higher position, better salary, and other rewards. Therefore, in the debate, it can be emphasized that effort and return are proportional. Only by putting in enough effort can you get the corresponding return. Success requires constant effort: the relationship between effort and return is constantly accumulating and sublimating. Only by constantly putting in effort could one continuously reap rewards. Success is not something that can be achieved overnight. It requires constant perseverance and hard work. Therefore, it can be emphasized in the debate that success requires constant effort. Only by putting in enough effort can you achieve continuous success. The above are some points that the positive side can revolve around. They can be freely developed and supplemented according to the specific situation and topic of the debate.
Is reading online novels more beneficial than harmful or harmful?
The pros and cons of reading online novels varied from person to person, depending on one's personal preferences and purpose of reading. From the perspective of some people, reading online novels might have some benefits, such as: 1. It provides a new reading experience: There are many types of online novels with rich content, allowing readers to come into contact with novels of different styles and topics to provide a new reading experience. Satisfying reading needs: Some people may not be able to read traditional books for various reasons. Online novels can be used as an alternative way to meet their reading needs. Increase the scope of knowledge: web novels often contain some fictional worlds and plots that allow readers to come into contact with different cultures and knowledge backgrounds to increase their knowledge. However, there were some potential drawbacks to reading online novels, such as: Some people may be addicted to the plot and characters in online novels and neglect important things in real life, which will negatively affect their health. 2. Distorted values: Some web novels may have some bad values and plots that may affect the reader's values and moral values. 3. Waste of time: Reading online novels requires a certain amount of time and energy. If you over-read it, it may cause time to be wasted and affect your work and study. Therefore, reading online novels has both advantages and disadvantages. The readers should read according to their own actual situation and preferences. Pay attention to moderate reading to avoid being addicted to it.
In the debate, we are the affirmative side, and the topic is a toy. Is there any good point of view or material to support this argument?
The argument that playthings are ambitious can be based on the following points and materials: 1. The concept of "toys with ambition" means that people should appreciate and pursue the value and meaning of toys instead of just treating them as entertainment tools. This view emphasized the role of toys in developing people's personality, intelligence, and emotions. Some literary works such as Dream of the Red Chamber and Water Margins also emphasized the importance of toys in Chinese traditional culture. In these works, toys were regarded as living objects with unique value and meaning, which could cultivate people's emotions and creativity. In modern society, toys also play an increasingly important role. For example, some toys could stimulate people's creativity and imagination, develop intelligence, and promote social interaction. Some toys could also be used as souvenirs to leave good memories for people. The idea of playing with toys can also be compared with playing with toys. If a person only treated toys as entertainment tools and did not pursue the value and meaning of toys, then it was possible to lose the motivation to move forward and become lazy and passive. On the contrary, if a person could gain value and meaning from toys, stimulate creativity and imagination, then it was possible to achieve greater achievements. The above are some of the views and materials that support the plaything Shang Zhi that can be used in the debate.
Was reading novels more beneficial than harmful?
The pros and cons of reading a novel varied from person to person, depending on one's personal values and purpose of reading. Some readers believe that reading novels can help them relax, improve their imagination and creativity, and cultivate reading habits. The novel could also provide elements such as plot and characters to help readers better understand the world and human nature. In addition, some novels also provided entertainment and satisfaction. However, other readers believe that reading novels may lead to indulging in fictional worlds and plots, ignoring important things in real life and even negatively affecting one's mental health. Reading novels might also waste too much time and energy, affecting studies and work. Therefore, whether reading a novel had more advantages than disadvantages or disadvantages than advantages depended on the reader's personal situation and purpose of reading. As readers, we should try our best to maintain rationality and balance. We should enjoy reading while paying attention to our physical and mental health and real life.