In the debate, we are the affirmative side, and the topic is a toy. Is there any good point of view or material to support this argument?
The argument that playthings are ambitious can be based on the following points and materials: 1. The concept of "toys with ambition" means that people should appreciate and pursue the value and meaning of toys instead of just treating them as entertainment tools. This view emphasized the role of toys in developing people's personality, intelligence, and emotions. Some literary works such as Dream of the Red Chamber and Water Margins also emphasized the importance of toys in Chinese traditional culture. In these works, toys were regarded as living objects with unique value and meaning, which could cultivate people's emotions and creativity. In modern society, toys also play an increasingly important role. For example, some toys could stimulate people's creativity and imagination, develop intelligence, and promote social interaction. Some toys could also be used as souvenirs to leave good memories for people. The idea of playing with toys can also be compared with playing with toys. If a person only treated toys as entertainment tools and did not pursue the value and meaning of toys, then it was possible to lose the motivation to move forward and become lazy and passive. On the contrary, if a person could gain value and meaning from toys, stimulate creativity and imagination, then it was possible to achieve greater achievements. The above are some of the views and materials that support the plaything Shang Zhi that can be used in the debate.
We are the affirmative debaters. for. Should high school students go to college? engage in a debate Please give me some reasons. Affirmative point of view
Whether high school students wanted to go to college was a question worth discussing. Here are some of the reasons for the affirmative debater: 1. Getting a higher degree can provide more opportunities. In today's society, academic qualifications had become the threshold for many professions. Having a higher academic qualification could provide more career choices and higher salaries. Especially in today's advanced technology, many industries require talents with high academic qualifications to be competent. High school education may not be enough to meet the requirements of these positions. 2. High school education and university education are different. High school education paid more attention to the cultivation of students 'basic quality and subject knowledge, while university education paid more attention to the cultivation of students' comprehensive quality and in-depth research. If high school students could get a higher degree, they could gain more experience and knowledge during their university life to improve their overall quality and competitiveness. 3. College students also have the opportunity to contribute to society. University education was not only for students to obtain higher academic qualifications, but also for students to become talents with independent thinking and innovative ability. If high school students could obtain higher academic qualifications, they could try various social activities and internships to contribute to society during their university years. High school education also required students to develop in all aspects. High school education not only cultivated students 'subject knowledge, but also their comprehensive quality and social skills. If high school students could obtain a higher degree, they could participate in various clubs and activities during their university years to train their social skills and comprehensive quality, laying a solid foundation for their future. To sum up, whether a high school student wanted to go to college or not depended on their personal situation and goals. If high school students could obtain higher academic qualifications, they would have more career opportunities and opportunities to contribute to society. However, if high school students did not want to pursue an overly high academic qualification, they could choose other occupations and activities to develop themselves in an all-round way.
In our debate competition, we were in the affirmative, and the topic was,"There must be a return for the effort." The opposing side's topic was,"There must be a return for the effort." How to distinguish the positive side
The affirmative side could debate around the following points: Contribution and return are closely related: there is a close relationship between contribution and return. Only by giving first can you expect to get a return. Whether it was in work, study, or personal life, we all need to put in effort and sweat before we can reap results and rewards. Therefore, in the debate, it can be emphasized that effort and reward are related. Only by putting in enough effort can you get the corresponding reward. The returns are usually visible: the returns between effort and return are usually visible. When we put in effort, we usually see the corresponding results and gains. For example, when we put in enough effort in work or study, we usually get rewards such as improvement and harvest. Therefore, it can be emphasized in the debate that the reward is usually visible, and only by putting in enough effort can you see the corresponding reward. 3. Contribution and return are proportional: Contribution and return are proportional. Our efforts and returns are usually proportional. Only by putting in enough effort can we get the corresponding returns. For example, when we put in enough effort at work, we usually get a higher position, better salary, and other rewards. Therefore, in the debate, it can be emphasized that effort and return are proportional. Only by putting in enough effort can you get the corresponding return. Success requires constant effort: the relationship between effort and return is constantly accumulating and sublimating. Only by constantly putting in effort could one continuously reap rewards. Success is not something that can be achieved overnight. It requires constant perseverance and hard work. Therefore, it can be emphasized in the debate that success requires constant effort. Only by putting in enough effort can you achieve continuous success. The above are some points that the positive side can revolve around. They can be freely developed and supplemented according to the specific situation and topic of the debate.
The school held a debate competition! We are in the affirmative, and our argument is that it is better to study in school, while the argument against is that it is better to study in society.
It was a common topic of debate whether it was better to study in school or in society. Here is some information that might be useful: The advantage of studying in school is that you can get a higher quality education, learn more in-depth knowledge, and improve your professional skills and thinking ability. These skills and knowledge can help students be more competitive in their future careers. The advantage of studying in society is that you can gain more experience and skills, enhance social skills and leadership skills, and broaden your horizons and worldview. These skills and knowledge could help people better adapt to society and deal with complex problems. 3. There are advantages and disadvantages to studying in school and society. Studying in school might limit students 'freedom and time, and they would have to bear higher financial and psychological pressure. Studying in society may bring greater social and professional risks, and you need to bear higher cultural and psychological pressure. Choosing to study in school or society should be based on personal needs and interests, as well as future career and life plans. The most important thing was to find a suitable way of learning and career development.
Debate: Does love need more rationality or romance? Please analyze it from a romantic point of view and write a three-debate argument.
Dear judges and listeners, Today, on behalf of our side, I would like to express my opinion on the topic of "love needs more rationality or romance". Love was a complex emotion that contained both rationality and romance. A romantic love is usually a passionate experience filled with feelings and emotions rather than rational thinking and judgment. But romance wasn't always necessary. Reason could also be a part of love. Romance could stimulate emotional resonance. In love, people often need to feel each other's emotions and feelings. This emotional experience can allow people to understand each other more deeply and resonate with each other emotionally. Therefore, romantic love can enhance the feelings of both parties and make people love each other more. Romance was also an indispensable part of love. Romance could be expressed in many ways, such as flowers, gifts, surprises, promises, and so on. These romantic elements could add color to love and make it more beautiful and precious. Romance can also make people cherish love more and make love more lasting and stable. Of course, rationality was also an indispensable part of love. Rationally thinking could allow people to analyze the problems and contradictions in love more objectively and accurately so as to better solve them. At the same time, rational thinking can also make love more stable and lasting, so that people can better understand each other's needs and thoughts, and thus better manage love. Therefore, I believe that rationality and romance are indispensable in love. A romantic love could stimulate people's emotional resonance and make people love each other more; a rational love could help people solve problems and contradictions better and make love more stable and lasting. In true love, rationality and romance complement each other to create a better world of love. Thank you.
The basic point of view of the article and the basic basis of the argument
Basic point of view: The main point of the novel was that the protagonist finally realized his dream and revenge through hard work and struggle. The basic basis of the argument: Through his own efforts and struggles, the protagonist obtained the opportunity and conditions to change the status quo, and seized the opportunity to carry out a successful counterattack. The protagonist experienced many setbacks and difficulties in his growth, but he never gave up pursuing his goal. The protagonist's struggle and hard work not only brought success to himself, but also brought positive influence and change to the people around him.
We're going to hold a debate. We're in the affirmative. The topic is: We're getting closer to the truth in today's information explosion. The opposing side was getting further and further away.
The information explosion has indeed greatly improved the ability of humans to obtain and process information. We can learn more facts and truths through a large amount of information. In this case, we are getting closer to the truth and can find the truth faster and make the right decision. However, the information explosion also brought some negative effects. Due to the amount of information we receive, some truths may be covered up or misunderstood. We need to spend more time and effort to filter and confirm the information to ensure that the information we obtain is accurate and credible. Therefore, even though the information explosion has brought us closer and closer to the truth, we still need to be cautious and suspicious, and constantly verify and confirm to avoid being misled by false information.
The classic argument of the opposing side in the online pros and cons debate competition
Network pros and cons As a modern communication tool, the Internet provided a convenient and fast way for people to communicate. The benefits of the internet included: 1. The Internet allows us to obtain information more easily. Through the network, we can access all kinds of information resources, including news, articles, videos, etc., anytime and anywhere. Moreover, these contents can be shared on various platforms, making the information more diverse and rich. The Internet can also help us learn and educate better. Through the internet, we can access various online courses, learning resources, library materials, etc., so that we can have a deeper understanding of various knowledge fields to improve our learning ability and level. The internet also provides us with more entertainment. Through the internet, we can access all kinds of videos, games, social media, etc. to enrich our entertainment life. However, there were also some negative effects of the Internet. The internet could also lead to the spread of false information. Through the internet, we can access all kinds of information, but this information may come from unreliable sources, which will cause us to receive wrong information and affect our judgment and decision-making. 2. The Internet could also lead to the leakage of personal privacy. Through the internet, we can easily access all kinds of sensitive personal information such as home address, phone number, etc., which may lead to the risk of personal information leakage. The internet could also lead to the spread of violence and hate speech. Through the internet, we can come into contact with all kinds of extreme speech and violence, which may have a negative impact on society. To sum up, the internet is a tool with both positive and negative effects. We need to use and manage the network correctly to maximize its advantages and avoid its negative effects.
Is the Open Book Good for the Debate?(I'm in the affirmative)
Is it beneficial to open the book to debate (I'm in the affirmative): In discussing the benefits of opening books, we need to make the following points clear: 1. Opening the book does not mean that the content itself is harmful. Reading beneficial content under the right conditions can promote personal growth and development. For example, learning new knowledge, understanding history and culture, appreciating literary works, and so on could all be done by opening books. Reading was not entirely harmless. Reading could bring about some negative effects such as addiction, negative emotions, and so on. Therefore, we need to consider the impact and consequences of reading and take appropriate measures to reduce the negative effects. 3. Whether or not an open book is beneficial depends on the content of the reading and the way of reading. If the content of the book was valuable, but the way of reading it was not appropriate, it might still have a negative impact. Therefore, when reading, we need to pay attention to the reading method and attitude to minimize the negative effects. To sum up, I think it's beneficial to open a book. Although reading will bring some negative effects, as long as we read beneficial content under appropriate conditions and adopt appropriate reading methods and attitudes, we can minimize the negative effects and promote personal growth and development.
In the debate, we are the opposing side. The topic of debate is more likely to be affected by emotional factors. Help me find some information.
Emotional factors are more likely to affect success. You can refer to the following relevant papers and materials: 1 The Emotions and Emotional Intelligence by Daniel Goleman (2000): This article explored the relationship between emotional intelligence and success and pointed out the impact of emotional factors on success. 2 Emotions and Success by James D, Professor of Psychology, Richard A Berk (2013): This article introduced the role of emotional factors in success, including motivation, self-confidence, optimism and so on. 3 The Emotions and Your Life by Laurens (2016): This book explored the impact of emotional factors on personal life, including mental health, interpersonal relationships, careers, etc. 4 Emotions and Memory by B.F. Skinner (1943): This article introduced the influence of emotional factors on memory. It believes that emotions can affect the accuracy and durability of memory. 5 The Emotions and Success: A Guide for Entrepreneurs by Business Emotions a company dedicated to the study of emotions and business (2018): This article provides advice for successful entrepreneurs on how to manage emotional factors and how to better use emotional factors to promote success.
Debate competition, should a successful work make a sequel? We are the affirmative side, so we should make a sequel. Ask questions from the opposing side, the more the better.
Alright, I can provide you with some counter-questions. 1. If the sequels change the original core elements of a successful work, such as the plot, characters, or worldview, should these changes be accepted? If you have to accept changes, will these changes destroy the unique charm and value of a successful work? Does making two sequels mean disrespect to the previous work? If so, would this disrespect lead to misunderstanding and destruction of the previous work? Would a 3-star sequela lead to the commodification of the work and maximize the benefits? If so, would the real value of the work be weakened due to this kind of commerce and profit? Would four sequels lead to a time limit and limited creative space? If so, would this restriction lead to a decline in the quality of the work? Will the sequels cause the fan base of the work to split and lose? If so, would this division and loss lead to the true value of the work being weakened? I hope these questions will help you better understand the opposing side's point of view. Now, we can start a free debate. Please raise your views and questions.