Review Detail of Slan in DC: Light Human
Review detail
It's rubbish, the story doesn't make any sense, of course it could be a funny fanfic but no, just reading the first chapter I knew that this story will be rubbish
DC: Light Human
SwayStar
Liked by 152 people
LIKEReplies19
I'd like to know too just becuase you write more words and not add anything with a little to no intelligence to make your point valid. but what I see here is someone who instead of giving pointers for the author you instead decided that bashing them was a better option this is why the quality of the site keeps going down you sir are basic.
Loophus:I'd like to know too just becuase you write more words and not add anything with a little to no intelligence to make your point valid. but what I see here is someone who instead of giving pointers for the author you instead decided that bashing them was a better option this is why the quality of the site keeps going down you sir are basic.image
this is what I'm talking about instead of being intelligent and actually giving a reason you thought that saying read the first chapter like it explains everything. but it doesn't instead you have shown that your IQ is the same has room temperature. cause if you actually read and understand what I was saying earlier then I believe you wouldn't have typed this or so I hope. all I'm asking for is to explain why not read it but an actual explanation the review so the author can fix there ploblem and make the book better and not throw out words because you can.
RadicalHuman02:Lol then just read the first chapter like he mentioned.
Unironically bringing up IQ is cringe, especially with that insult that screams middle schooler. It indeed is enough to explain how good or bad a story is, hence grammar and writing. You can tell a lot from simply the first chapter, especially with all the bad reviews. Despite that you insist to be extremely specific, like you are dissecting a human body. When in reality this is just a below mediocre fanfic, but no mr social justice warrior here wants us to be the next IGN and write a 10 page essay on how this story is good or bad. This is simply a rubbish story, cry about it and proceed to obtain a life.
Loophus:this is what I'm talking about instead of being intelligent and actually giving a reason you thought that saying read the first chapter like it explains everything. but it doesn't instead you have shown that your IQ is the same has room temperature. cause if you actually read and understand what I was saying earlier then I believe you wouldn't have typed this or so I hope. all I'm asking for is to explain why not read it but an actual explanation the review so the author can fix there ploblem and make the book better and not throw out words because you can.image
Loophus:why is it so hard to just write in a reverse with a few sentences tell people why they don't like it that's what a review is for but I guess that's to much for you or the other guy that came out of nowhere throwing out she and ign like they have anything to do with is
Since when did it become readers job to make author better at their job? It is voluntary work. If something is garbage i will call it garbage without telling it how to become gold.
Loophus:I'd like to know too just becuase you write more words and not add anything with a little to no intelligence to make your point valid. but what I see here is someone who instead of giving pointers for the author you instead decided that bashing them was a better option this is why the quality of the site keeps going down you sir are basic.image
lol I laughed so hard when I seen your post. it was how do I discribe this hmm well first I don't even care if you give advice to the author or not. second this whole thing started 2months ago honestly I forgot all about it until now but while I'm here I'll put the definition of what a review is for you. "a formal assessment or examination of something with the possibility or intention of instituting change if necessary" what the main post was is a comment and hers the definition for that "a verbal or written remark expressing an opinion or reaction" see the difference this is a review section not a comment section. and with this is my last time for coming back to do more of this nonsense good bye.
marcelll3214:Since when did it become readers job to make author better at their job? It is voluntary work. If something is garbage i will call it garbage without telling it how to become gold.
Good for you. I dont know if you noticed but you can say if you like the story or not in review. Why explain everything in words when simply pointing somebody to first chapter, where everything you need to know is directly shown, is enough. Don´t know why you sound so hurt over this after all this time. You saying that you dont care but still trying to prove your point kinda contradicts itself. I think it would be better for everybody if you did not comment anymore. It looks kinda silly...
Loophus:lol I laughed so hard when I seen your post. it was how do I discribe this hmm well first I don't even care if you give advice to the author or not. second this whole thing started 2months ago honestly I forgot all about it until now but while I'm here I'll put the definition of what a review is for you. "a formal assessment or examination of something with the possibility or intention of instituting change if necessary" what the main post was is a comment and hers the definition for that "a verbal or written remark expressing an opinion or reaction" see the difference this is a review section not a comment section. and with this is my last time for coming back to do more of this nonsense good bye.image
Loophus:I'd like to know too just becuase you write more words and not add anything with a little to no intelligence to make your point valid. but what I see here is someone who instead of giving pointers for the author you instead decided that bashing them was a better option this is why the quality of the site keeps going down you sir are basic.image
why would you say you don't care about constructive criticism when the whole reason you started this argument was because you said it was bad that the reviewer was only bashing the author. So what was the point
Loophus:lol I laughed so hard when I seen your post. it was how do I discribe this hmm well first I don't even care if you give advice to the author or not. second this whole thing started 2months ago honestly I forgot all about it until now but while I'm here I'll put the definition of what a review is for you. "a formal assessment or examination of something with the possibility or intention of instituting change if necessary" what the main post was is a comment and hers the definition for that "a verbal or written remark expressing an opinion or reaction" see the difference this is a review section not a comment section. and with this is my last time for coming back to do more of this nonsense good bye.image