Zhuangzi's two views on carefree travel: the argument between small and big and the argument that there is no need to wait, which one is right? I have to give a reason, thank you!
Zhuangzi's Xiaoyao You's two views: the debate between small and big and the theory of waiting and not waiting are both philosophical thinking. There are different views and explanations, and there is no absolute right or wrong. The debate between small and big believes that everything in the world is divided into big and small. The roc rises with the wind and soars 90,000 miles in a day, which is the embodiment of the difference in size. Although the butterfly's wings are small, they can move the entire natural world. In this point of view, things have their own nature and characteristics, big and small are relative, and should not be overly emphasized or belittled any concept. The theory of waiting and not waiting believed that the concepts of size, existence, and coming and going were relative rather than absolute. In this point of view, the carefree wanderer transcended the persistence of concepts such as size, existence and non-existence, coming and going, and believed that all active dharma were illusory, and only the non-active dharma was real. In this view, we should give up our obsession with things and live freely beyond all kinds of restrictions. Both views had their own reasons and scope of application. As for which view was correct, it needed to be considered according to different situations and context.
Metaphorical argument is a fact argument or a reason argument. Metaphorical argument is a fact argument.
An argument by metaphor can be either an argument of fact or an argument of reason, depending on the specific content of the metaphor used. In some cases, figurative arguments are used to prove that an idea or argument is based on facts because there is indeed some similarity between the thing and the idea. This kind of argument is called a fact argument because it proves that the point or argument is based on real facts. For example, if someone says," The sun is red," then the argument is based on fact, because there are many animals that have visual reactions when they see the sun, and these reactions are similar to the characteristics of red. On the other hand, figurative argument can also be used to prove that an idea or argument is reasonable because there is some similarity between the thing and the idea. This kind of argument is called a reasoning argument because it proves that the point or argument is based on correct reasoning and logical reasoning. For example, if someone said," The apple is a fighter among fruits," then this metaphor was reasonable because it proved that the apple had unique characteristics and advantages among fruits. Thus, a figurative argument can be either an argument of fact or an argument of reason. It depends on the specific content of the metaphor used and the nature of the point or argument being proved.
Is a metaphor an argument of fact or an argument of reason?
An argument could be a fact or a reason. Factual argument refers to using specific facts to prove a certain point of view or argument. For example, using a real example of a famous person to prove that one's point of view is correct. A logical argument refers to the use of reason or theory to prove a certain point of view or argument, such as using a certain philosophical concept or moral code to prove that one's point of view is correct. Metaphorical argument can be a fact or a reason argument. It can use specific examples or figurative metaphor to support a certain point of view or argument, so as to make the argument more vivid, vivid, and easy to understand. For example, using Sun Wukong's Golden Cudgel and the Earth as a metaphor to prove that the Earth is the center of the universe can make people understand this point more deeply.
Can you give me an example to explain the difference between the general argument and the sub-argument? I hope you can help me
The main difference between general argument and sub-argument was that they were different in the parts they were discussed. In an argumentative paper, the general point was usually a general point of view. It was the central idea of the entire paper and the point that the author wanted to express. The general argument usually consists of the following parts: 1. The summary of the general argument: The summary of the general argument briefly introduced the content of the general argument to let the readers understand the core idea and importance of the general argument. 2. The reasons for supporting the general argument: The author usually provides some specific examples, facts, or logical arguments to support the general argument. These examples, facts, or logical arguments can help the reader better understand the general argument. 3. The reasons for refuting the general argument: The author usually provides some specific examples, facts, or logical arguments to refute the general argument to let the readers realize the limitations or errors of the general argument. The sub-arguments were different specific points of view in the general argument. Each sub-argument was in-depth discussion and explanation of a specific aspect of the general argument. A sub-argument usually consists of the following parts: The summary of the sub-argument briefly introduced the content of the sub-argument to let the reader understand the core idea and importance of each sub-argument. 2. The reasons for supporting each sub-argument: In the reasons for supporting each sub-argument, the author usually provides some specific examples, facts, or logical arguments to support each sub-argument. 3. The reasons for refuting each argument: The author usually provides some specific examples, facts, or logical arguments to refute each argument so that the reader can recognize the limitations or errors of each argument. The main difference between the general argument and the sub-argument was that the general argument was the central idea of the whole thesis, while the sub-argument was the specific point of view in the general argument. When writing an argumentative paper, one needed to choose the appropriate general argument and sub-argument according to the purpose of the paper and the reader to achieve better writing results.
Can you give me an example to explain the difference between the general argument and the sub-argument? I hope you can help me
The general argument and sub-argument were commonly used in argumentative essays to summarize the main content and points of an article. Let me give you an example to explain the difference between the general argument and the sub-argument: Let's say the topic of an article is about courage. Then the general point of this article can be summarized as " courage is an important quality " and can be demonstrated from many angles. For example, courage can be expressed as courage in the face of challenges, courage in adversity, and so on. The points of this article could include: Courage is an important quality that can stimulate people's potential to realize their self-worth. Courage is an important quality that can make people stronger and more confident when facing challenges and difficulties. Courage is an important quality that allows people to make correct decisions and actions to overcome fear and hesitation. The difference between the general argument and the sub-argument was that the general argument was a general concept used to summarize the main content and point of view of an article, while the sub-argument was a specific part of the argument.
What were the functions of example argument, reasoning argument, metaphor argument, and comparison argument? written separately
Demonstrating with examples: Using concrete examples to support an argument makes it easier for the reader to understand and accept the argument. The role of examples is to let the reader have a deeper understanding of the argument and be able to support the argument better. Reasoning: Supporting an argument by stating a reason so that the reader understands the reason and reason for the argument. The purpose of reasoning was to make the reader understand the argument and better understand its importance. Metaphorical argument: Using a metaphor to express an argument so that the reader can understand the argument more easily. The function of figurative argument is to make the reader have a deeper understanding of the argument and can better support the argument. Comparisons: By comparing the differences, the reader can highlight the importance of the argument. The purpose of the comparison argument is to make the reader more aware of the importance of the argument and to better understand the advantages and disadvantages of the argument.
Why is an argument with a metaphor an argument with an example?
This question involved the difference between a metaphor and an example. Metaphorical argument was a way of comparing two or more things to reach a conclusion. The key to a figurative argument was that there was a certain similarity or contrast between the thing being argued and the thing being argued. For example, in the sentence " green is taken from blue and is more blue than blue ", the words " green " and " blue " were figurative, meaning that green was extracted from blue grass, but the color of green was darker than blue. Demonstrating with examples was to use specific examples to support the argument. The things in the examples should be real, concrete, and representative examples, not abstract concepts or analogies. For example," He studied hard and finally achieved excellent results " was an example to prove the importance of " diligence " to success in learning. In the sentence "blue is taken from blue and blue is blue", the "blue" and "blue" are a metaphor. It draws a conclusion by comparing the similarities between two things. Although this example itself was a way of argument, it was not an example because it did not provide specific examples to support the point.
The full text of Zhuangzi's "Carefree Travel"
The full text of Zhuangzi's "Carefree Travel" is as follows: Chuang Tzu caught fish in Haoliang. He raised the fish and raised the birds. There is a bird called Peng, whose chest is the corner of the city, and whose head is the sky. Chuang Tzu fished it up and threw it away. When he asked the bird about its free and unfettered journey, he said,"The bird is free and unfettered in its nest, eating and resting, and wants to be free and unfettered outside. Who is it that looks at you?" The rocs roam freely in the sky. The wings of the rocs are like the corners of the city walls, and the sky is like the sky. Chuang Tzu fished it up and threw it away. When he asked the bird about its free and unfettered journey, he said,"The bird is free and unfettered in its nest, eating and resting, and wants to be free and unfettered outside. Who is it that looks at you?" Chuang Tzu caught fish in Haoliang. He raised the fish and raised the birds. There is a bird called Peng, whose chest is the corner of the city, and whose head is the sky. Chuang Tzu fished it up and threw it away. When he asked the bird about its free and unfettered journey, he said,"The bird is free and unfettered in its nest, eating and resting, and wants to be free and unfettered outside. Who is it that looks at you?" The rocs roam freely in the sky. The wings of the rocs are like the corners of the city walls, and the sky is like the sky. Chuang Tzu fished it up and threw it away. When he asked the bird about its free and unfettered journey, he said,"The bird is free and unfettered in its nest, eating and resting, and wants to be free and unfettered outside. Who is it that looks at you?" Chuang Tzu caught fish in Haoliang. He raised the fish and raised the birds. There is a bird called Peng, whose chest is the corner of the city, and whose head is the sky. Chuang Tzu fished it up and threw it away. When he asked the bird about its free and unfettered journey, he said,"The bird is free and unfettered in its nest, eating and resting, and wants to be free and unfettered outside. Who is it that looks at you?" The rocs roam freely in the sky. The wings of the rocs are like the corners of the city walls, and the sky is like the sky. Chuang Tzu fished it up and threw it away. When he asked the bird about its free and unfettered journey, he said,"The bird is free and unfettered in its nest, eating and resting, and wants to be free and unfettered outside. Who is it that looks at you?" Mencius said,"The bird is free and unfettered in its shell." Mencius said,"The bird is free and unfettered in its shell." Mencius said,"The bird is free and unfettered in its shell." Chuang Tzu caught fish in Haoliang. He raised the fish and raised the birds. There is a bird called Peng, whose chest is the corner of the city, and whose head is the sky. Chuang Tzu fished it up and threw it away. When he asked the bird about its free and unfettered journey, he said,"The bird is free and unfettered in its nest, eating and resting, and wants to be free and unfettered outside. Who is it that looks at you?" The rocs roam freely in the sky. The wings of the rocs are like the corners of the city walls, and the sky is like the sky. Chuang Tzu fished it up and threw it away. When he asked the bird about its free and unfettered journey, he said,"The bird is free and unfettered in its nest, eating and resting, and wants to be free and unfettered outside. Who is it that looks at you?" Chuang Tzu caught fish in Haoliang. He raised the fish and raised the birds. There is a bird called Peng, whose chest is the corner of the city, and whose head is the sky. Chuang Tzu fished it up and threw it away. When he asked the bird about its free and unfettered journey, he said,"The bird is free and unfettered in its nest, eating and resting, and wants to be free and unfettered outside. Who is it that looks at you?" The rocs roam freely in the sky. The wings of the rocs are like the corners of the city walls, and the sky is like the sky. Chuang Tzu fished it up and threw it away. When he asked the bird about its free and unfettered journey, he said,"The bird is free and unfettered in its nest, eating and resting, and wants to be free and unfettered outside. Who is it that looks at you?" Mencius said,"The bird is free and unfettered in its shell." Mencius said,"The bird is free and unfettered in its shell." Mencius said,"The bird is free and unfettered in its shell." Chuang Tzu caught fish in Haoliang. He raised the fish and raised the birds. There is a bird called Peng, whose chest is the corner of the city, and whose head is the sky. Chuang Tzu fished it up and threw it away. When he asked the bird about its free and unfettered journey, he said,"The bird is free and unfettered in its nest, eating and resting, and wants to be free and unfettered outside. Who is it that looks at you?" The rocs roam freely in the sky. The wings of the rocs are like the corners of the city walls, and the sky is like the sky. Chuang Tzu fished it up and threw it away. When he asked the bird about its free and unfettered journey, he said,"The bird is free and unfettered in its nest, eating and resting, and wants to be free and unfettered outside. Who is it that looks at you?" Mencius said,"The bird is free and unfettered in its shell." Mencius said,"The bird is free and unfettered in its shell." Mencius said,"The bird is free and unfettered in its shell." Therefore, Chuang Tzu's freedom is natural. So who will look after you when you are free and unfettered? Free and unfettered in the inner world, who is the one who can maintain it? Therefore, those who are free and unfettered can achieve great things without hard work. This is to achieve success without hard work, so there is nothing to do, nothing to do, so there is no opportunity to be free. If you don't meet the right time, no one in the world can compete with you. Therefore, no one in the world can compete with those who are free.
The full text of Zhuangzi's "Carefree Travel"
Chuang Tzu was an ancient Chinese philosopher. His representative work, Carefree Travel, was considered one of the representative works of Taoist philosophy. The following is the full text of the "Carefree Travel": There is a fish in the North Sea called Kun. I don't know how big a kun is, but it's thousands of miles long. It turns into a bird, and its name is Peng. I don't know how many thousands of miles it is. It is called wind. Therefore, the roc flies like a cloud hanging in the sky. Among them,"Northern Underworld" referred to the sea in the north,"Kun" was a type of fish, and "Peng" was a type of bird. The Kun Peng in the story was a huge creature that could transform into other forms and generate wind while flying. This story mainly narrated a mentality of pursuing freedom and unfettered, emphasizing the relationship between man and nature, as well as the idea of " unfettered travel " advocated by Zhuangzi. Xiaoyao You meant to play freely. In this story, Chuang Tzu and his friend, the Peng Bird, were enjoying the beauty of nature and freedom in the sky. This story tells us that we should pursue freedom and freedom, transcend the shackles of the secular world, and enjoy the beauty of life.
Naruto and Barbara Get into an Argument Fanfic: What Could Be the Reason?
One possible reason could be a difference in their values. Naruto, from the Naruto series, values loyalty and hard - work above all. Barbara, perhaps from a different fictional universe, might value something else like purity or grace. Their different upbringings and the worlds they come from could also contribute. For example, Naruto grew up in a world full of ninja battles and had to fight for his place. Barbara might come from a more peaceful or magically - inclined world. When their paths cross, these differences in values and backgrounds could lead to an argument.
Zhuangzi's carefree travel contains several fables
Chuang Tzu's Free and Unfettered Journey was a fable which contained many fables. The theme of the Carefree Tour was to achieve true happiness and freedom through free strolling. In this novel, Chuang Tzu and his friends sailed on the sea. They saw many beautiful scenery and discussed philosophical issues such as life and death and freedom of human beings. Many of the characters in this story are personified images of Chuang Tzu and his friends, representing different ideas and values. Through the metaphor and dialogue of these characters, Zhuangzi tried to express the importance of freedom and happiness and how to realize true freedom and happiness.