With the Internet, do you still need books and teachers? Class debate, I'm on the opposing side, which means I don't want it. List a few things.
Although the Internet can allow us to obtain more knowledge and information, there are still many problems and difficulties in the process of learning. 1. The learning resources on the Internet are not comprehensive and rich enough. Some knowledge points may not be able to find complete information on the Internet. 2. Learning on the Internet is not controllable because there is no guarantee that all the online resources are accurate and reliable. Learning online requires a higher level of self-learning ability because you need to filter and organize learning resources and think and judge by yourself. Learning on the internet may distract us and cause us to be distracted and lag behind in other aspects. In contrast, books and teachers can help us learn and master knowledge more systematically and provide us with timely guidance and help. Of course, books and teachers were not without flaws. Books and teachers may sometimes be old and outdated, and need to be constantly updated and improved. 2. Books and teachers may sometimes be boring and abstract, and they need to be combined with specific cases and examples to understand and apply. Books and teachers can sometimes be expensive and scarce, requiring us to spend more time and effort to obtain them. Therefore, I believe that the choice between online and book teachers needs to be weighed and chosen according to individual needs and actual situations.
I'm going to participate in the debate tomorrow. I'm the opposing side. The topic of the debate is that the information on the Internet is not credible! I need a lot of materials. I hope everyone can help.
The credibility of information on the Internet was a very complicated problem because it involved the reliability of the source of the information, the accuracy of the information, the authenticity of the information, and many other aspects. Here is some information that might be useful to you: The reliability of information sources: There are many sources of information on the Internet, including search engines, news websites, social media, forums, and so on. However, the reliability of these sources is not necessarily the same because they may be affected by political, commercial, cultural and other factors. Therefore, when judging whether the information on the Internet was credible, the reliability of the information source needed to be considered. The accuracy of the information: There is a lot of information on the Internet, many of which are unverified or subjective. Therefore, the accuracy of the information on the Internet needed to be considered when judging whether it was credible. News, social media, and other time-sensitive information needed to be closely monitored to avoid being misled. The authenticity of the information: The information on the Internet may also contain false information. This information may have been deliberately fabricated, forged, or based on inaccurate sources. Therefore, the authenticity of the information on the Internet needed to be considered when judging whether it was credible or not. The value of information: Although the information on the Internet may contain false information and inaccurate information, if the content of the information is valuable, it can still have a positive impact on people. Therefore, the value of the information on the Internet needed to be considered when judging whether it was credible or not. This is some information that might be useful to you. Of course, the materials needed for the debate might include how to analyze the reliability and accuracy of online information, how to identify false information, how to evaluate the value of information, and so on. If you need more detailed help, I suggest you consult your debate instructor or coach.
Good books don't need debate
As a fan of online literature, I understand that the definition of a good book may vary from person to person. However, it was generally believed that a good book was a book that could resonate with the reader, produce emotional resonance, or bring inspiration and thought. From this point of view, a good book didn't need a particularly stunning plot and character creation, nor did it need too much language skills or literary value. On the contrary, a good book needed to have enough depth and content to arouse the readers 'thoughts and reflections so that they could resonate with it. In addition, good books also had to follow certain readers 'needs and reading habits. For example, some readers might prefer suspense, science fiction, or history books while others prefer romance, fantasy, or light novels. Therefore, good books should be selected according to the interests and needs of readers in order to better meet their needs. To sum up, a good book needs to satisfy a certain depth and content to arouse the reader's thinking and reflection. At the same time, it also needs to meet the reader's interest and needs. Although a good book didn't necessarily need a particularly stunning plot or character, they needed to have enough depth and content to attract readers.
Our school has a successful debate competition. Should we make a sequel? I'm the opposing side. Please give me more free debate arguments. Don't copy what's already on the internet...
Whether or not a successful work should be made into a sequel is a matter of copyright. You can refer to the following free debate arguments: Should the sequels of successful works be protected by copyright? A: Usually, the copyright of a successful work should be protected because it means that the creator has the right to make commercial use of the content, including adapting it into a sequel or any other form of work. Therefore, sequels should be regarded as independent works with the same copyright as the original works. Should I have the right to shoot a sequel? A: Whether or not the rights should allow the filming of a sequel depends on whether or not the creator has agreed to sell the rights to a third party. If the creator has sold the copyright to a company or individual, the company or individual has the right to decide whether to shoot a sequel and how to shoot it. If the creator did not sell the copyright, the company or individual must obtain the creator's permission to shoot the sequels. Should the sequels of successful works be protected by copyright? A: Whether or not a successful work's sequels should be protected depends on whether or not the creator has agreed to sell the copyright to a third party. If the creator has sold the copyright to a company or individual, the company or individual has the right to decide whether to shoot a sequel and how to shoot it. In this case, copyright protection helps to ensure that the copyright of a successful work is protected and will not be forgotten or exploited by an unauthorized third party. Should sequels of successful works be censored? A: Whether a successful work's sequels should be censored depends on copyright law. According to some copyright laws, if the copyright has been sold to a company or individual, the company or individual has the right to decide whether to censor the content and how to censor it. However, other copyright laws may require companies or individuals to review content to ensure that it meets ethical, legal, or other standards. Should sequels of successful works be censored to protect the rights of readers? A: Whether or not sequels of successful works should be censored to protect the rights of readers depends on the provisions of copyright law. Some copyright laws may require companies or individuals to review content to ensure that it meets ethical, legal, or other standards. However, other copyright laws might not have such a requirement. In this case, whether a successful work should be reviewed depended on whether the company or individual was willing to take such responsibility.
The school organized a debate, and the topic was " Should the school impose restrictions on the Internet?" I was on the opposing side of the debate-the school should not impose restrictions on the Internet. seek reason
Schools should not restrict the Internet because the Internet is a necessity of modern life. It has become an important tool for people to obtain information, learn knowledge, communicate and interact, entertainment and relax. As an educational institution, schools should provide students with an open, free and beneficial learning environment so that they can better develop their potential and creativity. Restrictions on the Internet by schools would negatively affect students 'independent learning and exploration. Restricting the use of the Internet may cause students to lose learning opportunities because they cannot obtain the latest knowledge and information on the Internet. At the same time, the use of the Internet can also lead to some bad behaviors such as Internet addiction, cyberbullying, etc., which will have a negative impact on the physical and mental health of students. The school's restrictions on the Internet could not really achieve the purpose of education. Education was not only carried out in the classroom, but also outside the classroom. The Internet was a huge information bank that could provide students with a large amount of resources and information, including academic articles, works of art, news reports, and so on. Restrictions on Internet use by schools could cause students to lose valuable opportunities for learning outside of class. To sum up, schools should not restrict the internet but should provide students with an open, free and beneficial learning environment so that they can better develop their potential and creativity.
Regarding the debate on whether high school students should fall in love, I'm on the opposing side.
On the contrary, high school students shouldn't be in love. Here are some materials that support this view: 1. Falling in love will have a negative impact on learning. High school students were in the middle of learning important knowledge. Falling in love could distract them and cause their academic performance to drop. 2. Love can lead to emotional problems. It was normal for high school students to have emotional problems during puberty. However, if the relationship is unhealthy, it may lead to emotional problems affecting their mental health. 3. Love might affect their future development. High school students should focus on their studies so that they could have a good future. Falling in love might distract them and cause their studies to decline, affecting their future development. Love may affect their image. High school students were educated in school, and their image was also the image of the school. If their relationship was seen by other students, it might affect their image and their status in school. Love may affect their social relationships. High school students should focus on their studies so that they can have a good social relationship in the future. If their relationship was seen by other students, it might affect their social relationships and their future opportunities.
High school students didn't have to do homework, debate, and argue with the opposing side!
The opposing side of the debate competition where high school students did not have to do homework was as follows: First of all, we need to clarify the meaning and value of doing homework. Doing homework was to help students consolidate and deepen their understanding of what they had learned, improve their academic performance, and improve their competitiveness. At the same time, doing homework was also to help students master the necessary knowledge and skills to lay a solid foundation for future studies and career development. However, under certain circumstances, we can consider not doing homework. For example, the student had already mastered the content, or the student had other important things to deal with, or the student felt that he did not need to do homework to consolidate and deepen his understanding. In this case, we can say that high school students don't need to do homework every weekend or holiday. But we also need to be aware that not doing homework may have a negative impact on students 'learning and growth. For example, not doing homework might cause students to be unable to master the necessary knowledge and skills, affecting their future studies and career development. In addition, not doing homework may cause students to lack the ability to think independently and solve problems, unable to adapt to future learning and work needs. Therefore, we believe that high school students should not do homework every weekend or during the holidays under appropriate circumstances, but they need to maintain the state and habit of learning to deepen their understanding and grasp knowledge through independent learning and thinking.
We want a debate. We're on the opposite side. We don't care about small things. Debate speech, urgent!
Dear judges and audience, the topic for today's debate is "Don't do small things". We think it's a noble quality not to do small things. We often encounter all kinds of small things in our lives, such as sorting garbage, saving water, respecting others, and so on. These things may seem insignificant, but they are very important to our lives and the development of society. Not doing small things can help us better protect the environment. If everyone could do small things such as sorting garbage and saving water, they could reduce the waste of garbage and water resources and protect the environment. In this way, our earth can serve us better and make us happier and healthier. Not doing small things can help us respect others better. Everyone has their own unique personality and habits. If everyone can not do small things such as not littering, not interrupting others, etc., a good social atmosphere can be formed to promote the harmony of interpersonal relationships. That way, we can respect others better and make our society warmer and better. Not doing small things can also help us develop society better. Society is made up of everyone. If everyone can not do small things, such as not littering, not interrupting others, etc., good social behavior and morality can be formed, and the overall development of society will be more orderly and efficient. To sum up, not doing small things is a noble quality. It can help us better protect the environment, respect others, and develop society. Therefore, we should start with small things and do small things to make our lives and society better. Thank you.
In the debate, I was the opposing side. The college students participating in volunteer activities focused on training. Ask for a debate topic.
College students participating in volunteer activities focused on training. On the contrary, it could be argued that college students participating in volunteer activities could not directly train their personal abilities, but might waste time and resources. Here are some possible counterarguments: 1. volunteer activities may affect college students 'studies. If college students participated in volunteer activities too frequently, it might take up their time and cause them to be unable to concentrate on their studies. Moreover, volunteer activities usually required a long time to participate in, which would have a certain negative impact on the health of college students. 2. volunteer activities do not provide practical work experience for college students. Although volunteer activities could cultivate college students 'sense of social responsibility and teamwork, these experiences could not be directly converted into professional experience. For most college students, their main goal was to find a job after graduation. Therefore, volunteer activities were not a necessary step in their career planning. 3. volunteer activities can't improve the academic performance of college students. Although volunteer activities can help students build a good sense of community and social responsibility, they can't directly improve students 'academic performance. Many college students participate in volunteer activities to find a better job after graduation rather than to enrich their studies. 4. The voluntary activities can't improve the professional skills of college students. Although volunteer activities can help students develop their leadership and teamwork skills, they cannot directly improve their professional skills. For many college students, they need to learn professional knowledge in school in order to find a better job after graduation. Therefore, volunteer activities were not a necessary step for them to improve their skills.
Urgent need! Debate on whether the film and television works respect the original work or pursue the trend, I am the opposing side! There were still questions to be asked!
Dear judges and audience, I'm the opposing side. The topic of today's debate is whether the film and television works respect the original work or pursue the trend. First of all, I want to talk about the original work. The original work refers to the original text created by the creator or author of the work. It is the soul and foundation of the work. A good film and television work should respect the original work and try to restore the spiritual meaning and plot structure of the original work as much as possible. Only in this way could the essence of the work be truly displayed and the audience feel the true emotional resonance. However, we have also seen many film and television works that pursue trends and fashion blindly pursuing new memes and freshness, ignoring the essence and core of the original work. Although these works could attract a large number of audiences in a short period of time, they lacked depth and content, and lost the value and significance of the original works. Then, let's talk about the issue of pursuing trends. Trend-seeking films and television works often attracted the attention of the audience at the first moment, but their storylines and characters were not profound enough and lacked content. These works simply catered to the needs of the market and did not really express the author's creativity and ideas. Therefore, we can say that pursuing fashion is not a good choice because it cannot bring real value to the work. Finally, I would like to raise a question: should we respect the original work or should we pursue the trend? I think we should respect the original work because the original work is the soul and foundation of the work. It can bring more cultural meaning and value to the work. At the same time, we should also pursue the trend because the trend is the product of an era. It can bring more exposure and attention to the work. However, we can only truly bring out the greatest value of the work by striking a balance between respecting the original work and pursuing the trend.
Do you still need to read 10,000 books in the internet age?
In the internet age, the significance of reading more than 10,000 books was no longer purely based on the number of books read, but on understanding and mastering the ideas, concepts, techniques, and other contents in the books. In the internet age, we can obtain information and knowledge through various means, including search engines, online courses, online forums, social media, and so on. These channels provide a wealth of resources and tools to help us better understand and apply the content in the book. At the same time, the Internet age also brought some new problems and challenges, such as information overload, false information, and so on. In this case, reading more than 10,000 books can help us better obtain and understand information, improve our judgment and critical thinking, and avoid being misled by wrong information and opinions. Therefore, reading more than 10,000 volumes still has important value and significance. It can help us better understand the world and improve our overall quality and competitiveness.