High school students didn't have to do homework, debate, and argue with the opposing side!
The opposing side of the debate competition where high school students did not have to do homework was as follows: First of all, we need to clarify the meaning and value of doing homework. Doing homework was to help students consolidate and deepen their understanding of what they had learned, improve their academic performance, and improve their competitiveness. At the same time, doing homework was also to help students master the necessary knowledge and skills to lay a solid foundation for future studies and career development. However, under certain circumstances, we can consider not doing homework. For example, the student had already mastered the content, or the student had other important things to deal with, or the student felt that he did not need to do homework to consolidate and deepen his understanding. In this case, we can say that high school students don't need to do homework every weekend or holiday. But we also need to be aware that not doing homework may have a negative impact on students 'learning and growth. For example, not doing homework might cause students to be unable to master the necessary knowledge and skills, affecting their future studies and career development. In addition, not doing homework may cause students to lack the ability to think independently and solve problems, unable to adapt to future learning and work needs. Therefore, we believe that high school students should not do homework every weekend or during the holidays under appropriate circumstances, but they need to maintain the state and habit of learning to deepen their understanding and grasp knowledge through independent learning and thinking.
Regarding the debate on whether high school students should fall in love, I'm on the opposing side.
On the contrary, high school students shouldn't be in love. Here are some materials that support this view: 1. Falling in love will have a negative impact on learning. High school students were in the middle of learning important knowledge. Falling in love could distract them and cause their academic performance to drop. 2. Love can lead to emotional problems. It was normal for high school students to have emotional problems during puberty. However, if the relationship is unhealthy, it may lead to emotional problems affecting their mental health. 3. Love might affect their future development. High school students should focus on their studies so that they could have a good future. Falling in love might distract them and cause their studies to decline, affecting their future development. Love may affect their image. High school students were educated in school, and their image was also the image of the school. If their relationship was seen by other students, it might affect their image and their status in school. Love may affect their social relationships. High school students should focus on their studies so that they can have a good social relationship in the future. If their relationship was seen by other students, it might affect their social relationships and their future opportunities.
Should middle school students read romance novels? A debate organized by the school. The opposing side should not. Urgent.
Romance novels usually referred to literary works that described romance, love, and emotional entanglements. They were more popular among middle school students. The debate organized by the school on whether the opposing side should read romance novels could be based on the following points: Some fictional plots and characters often appear in romance novels, which have a negative impact on the study and life of middle school students. The love plots in romance novels were often superficial and could not really reflect the values and values of love in real life. In addition, romance novels tended to divert the time and energy of middle school students, causing them to be unable to study seriously and do other things well. Romance novels can improve the literary quality and aesthetic ability of middle school students. The delicate emotions and beautiful language described in some romance novels can stimulate the interest of middle school students in literature and love and improve their literary level and aesthetic ability. So I think middle school students can read some romance novels appropriately, but they should control the time and frequency of reading, study hard and do other things well. Of course, for some parents and teachers, they might think that middle school students should spend more time and energy on studies and sports instead of reading some illusory romance novels.
The theme was whether high school students should read online novels and play online games. The opposing side of the debate concluded the speech.
Respected judges, dear opposing debaters: First of all, I want to thank you for preparing this debate for us. In this match, we had a heated discussion about whether high school students should read online novels and play online games. Through our debate, we each put forward our own views and deeply explored this issue. The positive side believes that reading online novels and playing online games is an irresponsible behavior for high school students and will bring them negative effects. Reading online novels and playing online games will make high school students addicted to it, affecting their studies and physical and mental health; reading online novels and playing online games will make them lose their attention to real life, resulting in their lack of social responsibility and interpersonal skills. Therefore, Zheng Fang believed that high school students should not read online novels or play online games. On the other hand, the opposing side believed that reading online novels and playing online games were not a bad thing. As long as they controlled their time and energy well, it would not bring negative effects to high school students. The opposing side believed that reading online novels and playing online games could enrich the after-school life of high school students and improve their cultural qualities and hobbies; reading online novels and playing online games could also train their social skills and interpersonal skills to make them more mature and confident. Therefore, the opposing side believed that high school students could read online novels and play online games appropriately. In the following debate, we will continue to explore this issue in depth and vigorously refute our own views. Finally, I hope that we can reach a consensus to let high school students make better use of their spare time to develop their interests and talents to lay a solid foundation for future success.
The opposing side's argument about the debate on "Should middle school students care about current politics?"
The opposing side of the debate on whether middle school students should care about current politics might include the following: Middle school students should be concerned about current affairs but should not be overly concerned. The content of current politics is very broad, including politics, economy, culture, society and so on. For middle school students, early exposure to too professional terms and content may bring them learning difficulties. At the same time, paying too much attention to current affairs would also cause unnecessary anxiety and stress for middle school students, which was not conducive to their healthy growth. Middle school students should be concerned about current politics but should not blindly follow and support certain political views. On the basis of understanding different political views and positions, middle school students can cultivate their own thinking and thinking ability, better understand the world and themselves, and also help them form correct values and worldviews. However, blindly following and supporting certain political views would bring about negative effects, such as social instability and division. Middle school students should care about current affairs because they are the future pillars of the country. Understanding and paying attention to current politics can help middle school students better adapt to the future social development and contribute to the country's construction and development. However, if you only regard caring about current politics as a way of political participation and ignore the importance of learning itself, you will miss the opportunity and potential of development.
In the debate, I was the opposing side. The college students participating in volunteer activities focused on training. Ask for a debate topic.
College students participating in volunteer activities focused on training. On the contrary, it could be argued that college students participating in volunteer activities could not directly train their personal abilities, but might waste time and resources. Here are some possible counterarguments: 1. volunteer activities may affect college students 'studies. If college students participated in volunteer activities too frequently, it might take up their time and cause them to be unable to concentrate on their studies. Moreover, volunteer activities usually required a long time to participate in, which would have a certain negative impact on the health of college students. 2. volunteer activities do not provide practical work experience for college students. Although volunteer activities could cultivate college students 'sense of social responsibility and teamwork, these experiences could not be directly converted into professional experience. For most college students, their main goal was to find a job after graduation. Therefore, volunteer activities were not a necessary step in their career planning. 3. volunteer activities can't improve the academic performance of college students. Although volunteer activities can help students build a good sense of community and social responsibility, they can't directly improve students 'academic performance. Many college students participate in volunteer activities to find a better job after graduation rather than to enrich their studies. 4. The voluntary activities can't improve the professional skills of college students. Although volunteer activities can help students develop their leadership and teamwork skills, they cannot directly improve their professional skills. For many college students, they need to learn professional knowledge in school in order to find a better job after graduation. Therefore, volunteer activities were not a necessary step for them to improve their skills.
how to argue in a debate
In a debate, one side would argue against the other side's point of view to strengthen their own point of view. The purpose of an argument was to let the audience better understand their point of view and persuade them to accept it. There were a few points to note in order to successfully defend: 1. Fully prepared: Before the debate, you need to fully study your own point of view and the other party's point of view and prepare a strong argument to refute the other party. 2. Grasp the key points: You need to grasp the key points of the other party's point of view and refute them forcefully. 3. Use logic: You need to use logical reasoning to prove your point of view so that the audience can better understand your point of view. 4. Good at communication: You need to be good at communication and effectively communicate with the audience so that the audience can better understand your point of view. 5. Maintain confidence: You need to maintain confidence in your argument and believe that your point of view is correct and that you can convince the other party to accept your point of view.
The school organized a debate, and the topic was " Should the school impose restrictions on the Internet?" I was on the opposing side of the debate-the school should not impose restrictions on the Internet. seek reason
Schools should not restrict the Internet because the Internet is a necessity of modern life. It has become an important tool for people to obtain information, learn knowledge, communicate and interact, entertainment and relax. As an educational institution, schools should provide students with an open, free and beneficial learning environment so that they can better develop their potential and creativity. Restrictions on the Internet by schools would negatively affect students 'independent learning and exploration. Restricting the use of the Internet may cause students to lose learning opportunities because they cannot obtain the latest knowledge and information on the Internet. At the same time, the use of the Internet can also lead to some bad behaviors such as Internet addiction, cyberbullying, etc., which will have a negative impact on the physical and mental health of students. The school's restrictions on the Internet could not really achieve the purpose of education. Education was not only carried out in the classroom, but also outside the classroom. The Internet was a huge information bank that could provide students with a large amount of resources and information, including academic articles, works of art, news reports, and so on. Restrictions on Internet use by schools could cause students to lose valuable opportunities for learning outside of class. To sum up, schools should not restrict the internet but should provide students with an open, free and beneficial learning environment so that they can better develop their potential and creativity.
What kind of debate was suitable for high school students?
High school students were suitable to participate in debates. They could train their thinking ability and eloquence, and at the same time, expand their knowledge. The content of the debate could involve various topics such as politics, economy, culture, society, etc. High school students could choose a topic in their major or field of interest and organize a debate competition. This way, not only could he train his debate skills, but he could also display his talent and make like-minded friends.
Should high school students publish books to debate?
Whether high school students should publish a book was a topic worth discussing. Before we discuss this, we need to understand the definition and background of publishing books. Writing a book referred to making one's work public, including publishing books, blog posts, articles, essays, and other forms of work. In the process of publishing a book, the author had to bear certain legal responsibilities, including copyright, trademark rights, patent rights, and so on. If the work was adapted, translated, or compiled into a book, the author would also have to bear the legal responsibility for the adaptation, translation, or compilation. High school students 'motives for publishing books might be to make money, enrich their knowledge, display their talents, and so on. However, if the purpose of publishing a book was to make money by publishing it, then this behavior might be regarded as a business activity that required legal and moral considerations. If the purpose of publishing a book is to enrich one's knowledge, then this behavior can help high school students better understand their interests and career plans, and improve their writing and presentation skills. When considering whether high school students should publish books, we need to consider the following questions: 1. Do high school students have enough writing ability and creativity to write truly valuable works? Do high school students have enough time and energy to complete the workload and academic requirements of publishing a book? Is publishing a suitable way for high school students to develop their careers and personal growth? In summary, whether a high school student should publish a book or not requires a comprehensive consideration of many factors. It is not easy to give a positive or negative answer. If high school students could show their talent and growth through publishing books, then this kind of behavior was worth encouraging. However, if a high school student's purpose in publishing a book was to make money or affect their studies, then this behavior needed to be carefully considered.
The classic argument of the opposing side in the online pros and cons debate competition
Network pros and cons As a modern communication tool, the Internet provided a convenient and fast way for people to communicate. The benefits of the internet included: 1. The Internet allows us to obtain information more easily. Through the network, we can access all kinds of information resources, including news, articles, videos, etc., anytime and anywhere. Moreover, these contents can be shared on various platforms, making the information more diverse and rich. The Internet can also help us learn and educate better. Through the internet, we can access various online courses, learning resources, library materials, etc., so that we can have a deeper understanding of various knowledge fields to improve our learning ability and level. The internet also provides us with more entertainment. Through the internet, we can access all kinds of videos, games, social media, etc. to enrich our entertainment life. However, there were also some negative effects of the Internet. The internet could also lead to the spread of false information. Through the internet, we can access all kinds of information, but this information may come from unreliable sources, which will cause us to receive wrong information and affect our judgment and decision-making. 2. The Internet could also lead to the leakage of personal privacy. Through the internet, we can easily access all kinds of sensitive personal information such as home address, phone number, etc., which may lead to the risk of personal information leakage. The internet could also lead to the spread of violence and hate speech. Through the internet, we can come into contact with all kinds of extreme speech and violence, which may have a negative impact on society. To sum up, the internet is a tool with both positive and negative effects. We need to use and manage the network correctly to maximize its advantages and avoid its negative effects.