Urgent need! Debate on whether the film and television works respect the original work or pursue the trend, I am the opposing side! There were still questions to be asked!
Dear judges and audience, I'm the opposing side. The topic of today's debate is whether the film and television works respect the original work or pursue the trend. First of all, I want to talk about the original work. The original work refers to the original text created by the creator or author of the work. It is the soul and foundation of the work. A good film and television work should respect the original work and try to restore the spiritual meaning and plot structure of the original work as much as possible. Only in this way could the essence of the work be truly displayed and the audience feel the true emotional resonance. However, we have also seen many film and television works that pursue trends and fashion blindly pursuing new memes and freshness, ignoring the essence and core of the original work. Although these works could attract a large number of audiences in a short period of time, they lacked depth and content, and lost the value and significance of the original works. Then, let's talk about the issue of pursuing trends. Trend-seeking films and television works often attracted the attention of the audience at the first moment, but their storylines and characters were not profound enough and lacked content. These works simply catered to the needs of the market and did not really express the author's creativity and ideas. Therefore, we can say that pursuing fashion is not a good choice because it cannot bring real value to the work. Finally, I would like to raise a question: should we respect the original work or should we pursue the trend? I think we should respect the original work because the original work is the soul and foundation of the work. It can bring more cultural meaning and value to the work. At the same time, we should also pursue the trend because the trend is the product of an era. It can bring more exposure and attention to the work. However, we can only truly bring out the greatest value of the work by striking a balance between respecting the original work and pursuing the trend.
The debate competition is about the classics or the popular literature. The questions that can be asked in the free debate segment, I am on the side of the classics, so it is best to be original.
As a classic author, I can ask the following questions to support my point of view: Classic works contain profound thoughts and values that have a profound impact on our growth and development. For example, the social reality and characters described in Dream of the Red Chamber are worthy of our deep consideration and reflection, and the concept of love and marriage in Pride and Predict has a profound revelation for our aesthetic and love. These works not only help us understand the world, but also shape our aesthetics and values. 2. Classic works have extremely high literary and artistic value, leaving precious cultural heritage for future generations. These works not only have a unique charm in language, structure and style, but also reflect the cultural, social and historical background of the time with eternal charm. For example, the plays Hamlet and The White Night Journey by William shakespeare are regarded as the classics in the history of world literature. They not only let us feel the complexity of human emotions and thoughts, but also let us realize the value and significance of literature. 3. Classic works can stimulate our inspiration and creativity. Many classic works were the source of inspiration for authors. For example, Cao Xueqin created a unique literary style through detailed descriptions and imaginative plot designs in Dream of the Red Chamber. Classics can also stimulate our imagination and creativity, making us more determined and confident in the pursuit of our dreams and goals. To sum up, the classic works have a profound and lasting influence on us. Classic works contain profound thoughts and values that can shape our aesthetics and values. Classic works have extremely high literary and artistic value, which can stimulate our inspiration and creativity. Although popular literature also has a certain effect on us, the effect of classic works is more obvious and lasting.
In the college debate competition, the topic of debate was whether the college students 'major choice should be based on their personal interests or their future. I am the opposing side, seeking freedom to debate the problem,
The opposing side's second defense is very grateful for the free debate question you provided. Here are some possible questions for your reference: Is it necessary to balance personal interests and professional prospects? If you have to make a choice, which factor do you think should be prioritized? Should personal interests be excluded when choosing a major? If you have to make a choice, which major do you think you should prioritize your personal interests? 3. How to ensure that students don't lose their motivation for majors that have no obvious interest? How to encourage students to pursue their interests while also considering their future employment prospects? Should students who are interested but have poor job prospects choose this major? If students choose this major, will they succeed? Should students 'personal background and adaptability be taken into account when choosing a major? If students don't have enough background and adaptability, can they adapt to the new major?
Regarding the debate on whether high school students should fall in love, I'm on the opposing side.
On the contrary, high school students shouldn't be in love. Here are some materials that support this view: 1. Falling in love will have a negative impact on learning. High school students were in the middle of learning important knowledge. Falling in love could distract them and cause their academic performance to drop. 2. Love can lead to emotional problems. It was normal for high school students to have emotional problems during puberty. However, if the relationship is unhealthy, it may lead to emotional problems affecting their mental health. 3. Love might affect their future development. High school students should focus on their studies so that they could have a good future. Falling in love might distract them and cause their studies to decline, affecting their future development. Love may affect their image. High school students were educated in school, and their image was also the image of the school. If their relationship was seen by other students, it might affect their image and their status in school. Love may affect their social relationships. High school students should focus on their studies so that they can have a good social relationship in the future. If their relationship was seen by other students, it might affect their social relationships and their future opportunities.
We are going to have a debate. The topic of the debate is our own decision. I am the positive side. I need to ask a few questions to question the negative side. I am urgently asking for thanks.
As a positive, you can consider asking the following questions to question the negative: 1 What is "our youth is our own decision"? In this sentence, who should make this decision? What did this decision mean? If youth needs to make decisions, what should these decisions be like? Does it include immoral or inappropriate decisions? If a person can't make his own decision, then is there any meaning to his youth? Are there enough resources for everyone to make their own decisions? If so, where did these resources come from? If not, then why? Should a person be blamed or punished if he cannot make his own decisions? If so, was this accusation or punishment reasonable? 6. Do those who make their own decisions receive the respect and support they deserve? If so, why? If not, then why? Is there enough education and social training to help people make the right decisions? If so, where was the training conducted? If not, then why? If a person's youth is limited or deprived, does he still have the right to pursue his dreams and goals? If so, why? If not, then why? These questions can help you better understand the opposing side's point of view and arguments in order to better debate.
The topic of the debate was "Should a novel be adapted into a movie to respect the original work?"
Whether or not the adaptation of a novel should respect the original work was a topic worth discussing. Respect for the original work meant that the spirit and storyline of the original work should be maintained as much as possible when the film was adapted, and the copyright of the original work should be respected. Doing so would allow the author of the original novel to get the rewards he deserved and ensure that the audience could enjoy the best viewing experience. However, adapting a movie could also bring some challenges. If the adaptation was too successful, it might destroy the uniqueness and appeal of the original work, making it difficult for the audience to truly understand the content presented in the film. In addition, if the film differed greatly from the original work, the author of the original work might be dissatisfied with the adapted film and might take legal measures to protect his intellectual property rights. Therefore, when adapting a movie, it should respect the original work as much as possible and maintain the spirit of the original work. At the same time, the film adaptation should also take into account its own degree of success to avoid destroying the uniqueness and appeal of the original work.
Urgent ~ Debate Competition: Should a classic film and television drama be made into a sequel?
Whether or not a classic film or television series should be made into a sequel was a topic worth discussing. Here are some ideas that might help answer this question: Supporting the view of making a sequel: The sequels of classic movies and TV series could once again attract the audience to bring new experiences and surprises. 2. The sequels of classic movies and TV series could maintain the style and theme of the original works and carry out innovation and development on this basis. Three sequels could bring more commercial benefits because they could attract more audiences and investments. Opposition to the sequels: The sequels of classic movies and TV series may destroy the image and meaning of the original work and repeat and extend it. 2. The classic works have already been deeply rooted in the hearts of the people. Making sequels may disappoint and tire the audience. The three-shot sequels might distract the fans and audience of the original work and lead to a decline in the evaluation of the original work. To sum up, there is no absolute answer to this question because whether or not to make a sequel depends on the decision of the audience and the film producers. If the audience was interested in the sequels of classic movies and television dramas and were willing to support the film producers, as well as the confidence and resources to create new and valuable content, then the sequels might be successful. However, if the audience was unwilling or unable to accept the sequels, the film producers could not guarantee their success. Therefore, it was important to find a balance so that the sequels could not only satisfy the needs of the audience, but also bring commercial and reputational benefits to the film producers.
Urgent ~ Debate Competition: Should a classic film and television drama be made into a sequel?
Whether or not a classic film or television series should be filmed was a more complicated question. For details, one could refer to the following points: 1. Sequels to classic movies and TV shows may exist because people are still interested in the previous work or some plot or theme of the previous work needs further exploration or development. In addition, sequels could also provide the audience with a sense of freshness and surprise, allowing them to continue to enjoy the story and performance of the work. Two sequels might also have a negative impact on the original works of classic movies and television dramas. If the quality of the sequels was not as good as the previous one, the audience might lose interest in the sequels and have a negative impact on the original. In addition, if the sequel completely plagiarized or plagiarized the content of the original work, it might also damage the reputation and influence of the original work. Therefore, making a sequel to a classic film and television drama was a possible choice, but it needed to be carefully considered to avoid negatively affecting the original work. Most importantly, sequels should be based on sufficient research and consideration to ensure that they faithfully present the theme and plot of the original work.
Should middle school students read romance novels? A debate organized by the school. The opposing side should not. Urgent.
Romance novels usually referred to literary works that described romance, love, and emotional entanglements. They were more popular among middle school students. The debate organized by the school on whether the opposing side should read romance novels could be based on the following points: Some fictional plots and characters often appear in romance novels, which have a negative impact on the study and life of middle school students. The love plots in romance novels were often superficial and could not really reflect the values and values of love in real life. In addition, romance novels tended to divert the time and energy of middle school students, causing them to be unable to study seriously and do other things well. Romance novels can improve the literary quality and aesthetic ability of middle school students. The delicate emotions and beautiful language described in some romance novels can stimulate the interest of middle school students in literature and love and improve their literary level and aesthetic ability. So I think middle school students can read some romance novels appropriately, but they should control the time and frequency of reading, study hard and do other things well. Of course, for some parents and teachers, they might think that middle school students should spend more time and energy on studies and sports instead of reading some illusory romance novels.
A film and television work that is faithful to the original work
The TV series " The Three-Body Problem " and the movie " The Outsider " were two film and television works that were faithful to the original work. The adaptation process of " The Three-Body Problem " was faithful to the original novel. The narrative focused on suspense creation, and the sci-fi world view and philosophical thinking were clearly explained, successfully attracting the audience. In terms of video production, it also showed the new advancement of China's television drama industry. The movie," The Outsider," was loyal to the original work from the first line, retaining the plot and spirit of the original work. It was directed by Francis Ford Coppola and made many stars famous. Both of these works were considered successful adaptation of the original works.
Debate competition, should a successful work make a sequel? We are the affirmative side, so we should make a sequel. Ask questions from the opposing side, the more the better.
Alright, I can provide you with some counter-questions. 1. If the sequels change the original core elements of a successful work, such as the plot, characters, or worldview, should these changes be accepted? If you have to accept changes, will these changes destroy the unique charm and value of a successful work? Does making two sequels mean disrespect to the previous work? If so, would this disrespect lead to misunderstanding and destruction of the previous work? Would a 3-star sequela lead to the commodification of the work and maximize the benefits? If so, would the real value of the work be weakened due to this kind of commerce and profit? Would four sequels lead to a time limit and limited creative space? If so, would this restriction lead to a decline in the quality of the work? Will the sequels cause the fan base of the work to split and lose? If so, would this division and loss lead to the true value of the work being weakened? I hope these questions will help you better understand the opposing side's point of view. Now, we can start a free debate. Please raise your views and questions.