webnovel

In ancient times, was the difference between Di and Shu really as serious as in novels?

2024-07-17 06:41
1 answer
2024-07-17 11:57

In ancient times, the difference between Di and Shu was indeed a very important concept. The system of inheritance of the eldest son was one of the traditional family inheritance systems in China. The eldest son referred to the system in which the eldest son inherited the family business and property after the death of his father or mother. This system was reflected in many cultures. For example, in China's feudal dynasties, the eldest son inheritance system had always been one of the important political systems. However, the difference between Di and Shu in ancient society was not as serious as described in modern novels. Although the eldest son inheritance system ensured the inheritance of the family's interests, not all families strictly followed this system. In some cases, the eldest son also had the right to inherit or could obtain the right to inherit through other means. In addition, the difference between Di and Shu was not as strict as described in modern novels. In some cultures, children born from concubines were also respected. Although the difference between the Di and Shu in ancient society was very important, it was not as serious as described in modern novels.

Is the difference between Di and Shu in history really as serious as in novels?

1 answer
2024-07-17 06:46

In history, the difference between Di and Shu was not as serious as in novels. Although there might be some differences in some situations, it could not completely determine a person's status and fate. In Chinese history, the system of inheritance of the eldest son was a relatively common custom. If a family had property or power, it would usually be inherited by the eldest son. However, this did not mean that other siblings did not have the right to enjoy this property or power. They might fight for inheritance in other ways. In addition, the difference between Di and Shu in history did not emphasize gender differences as in novels. In some cases, there might be a certain difference between the eldest son and the non-eldest son, but this could not completely determine a person's status and fate. For example, in some dynasties, it was not uncommon for a non-legitimate eldest son to become an emperor. In history, the difference between Di and Shu was not as serious as in novels. Although there might be some differences in some situations, it could not completely determine a person's status and fate.

How serious was the concept of direct descendants in ancient China? What was the difference between Di and Shu?

1 answer
2024-09-15 05:21

In ancient China, the concept of Di Shu was quite serious, and the difference between Di Shu and Shu Shu was also very obvious. In ancient China, the system of inheritance of the eldest son was the foundation of the feudal system. The eldest son was the heir designated by the father after his father died, usually the highest leader of the family. The eldest son inheritance system ensured the continuation and stability of the family, and also allowed the family's property and power to be passed down. The specific implementation method of the eldest son inheritance system varies from era to era and region, but it usually includes the following steps: 1. Determination of the eldest son: After the father dies, the eldest son is determined according to the father's last words or the family tradition. It was usually held by the oldest, most skilled, smartest, and most prestigious person in the family. 2. Selection of concubines: After determining the eldest son, the other men in the family must be selected. The selection criteria were usually age, martial arts, wisdom, and so on. 3. Distinguish between Di and Shu: In the process of selecting the son of a concubine, the family would usually differentiate between Di and Shu. The difference between Di and Shu was also quite obvious. The eldest son of the Di family was called the Di family, while the son of the Shu family was called the Shu family. 4. Di Shu treatment: When inheriting property and power, the eldest son has priority, while the illegitimate son needs to follow the rules of the eldest son inheritance system. The concept of direct descendants was very strong in ancient Chinese society, and the system of eldest son succession had also become one of the important values in Chinese traditional culture. Although modern society had already abolished the system of inheritance of the eldest son, the concept of direct descendants was still reflected in some families.

The difference between a Di Prince and a Shu Prince

1 answer
2025-01-01 23:34

The difference between Di and Shu princes was their birth status and inheritance rights. Di princes referred to the sons of the emperor's main wife, while Shu princes referred to the sons of concubines or concubines who were lower than the main wife. A legitimate prince had a higher status and had the opportunity to inherit the throne and enjoy priority in inheriting titles and property. Shu Princes did not have the chance to become emperors. They had a lower order of succession and were usually conferred the title of local kings. The Di prince bore the responsibility of being the successor of the family and enjoyed a higher status and power, while the Shu prince had a clear difference in status and power. To sum up, the difference between a Di prince and a Shu prince was mainly reflected in their birth identity, status, and inheritance rights.

Is there any difference in the status of the ancient Di son and the Shu son?

1 answer
2024-12-23 15:27

In ancient times, there was a difference in the status of legitimate sons and illegitimate sons. A legitimate son was a son born from the wife. He enjoyed the highest status and authority and was regarded as the main line of the family and the legal heir of his father. They had the right to inherit the family's property and status. A concubine's son was a son born from a concubine. He had a lower status and was regarded as a branch of the family and the illegal heir of his father. The son of a concubine had limited inheritance rights. He could only inherit a small portion of his father's property and could only be separated after his father died. The difference between legitimate sons and illegitimate sons was not only reflected in inheritance rights, but also in social status and treatment. Di sons had a higher social status and enjoyed more respect and honor, while the status of illegitimate sons was relatively lower and sometimes even discriminated against. Therefore, there was a difference in the status of Di sons and Shu sons in ancient times.

The difference between serious literature and popular literature

1 answer
2025-03-13 11:32

Serious literature and popular literature are two different types of literature. The main difference lies in the purpose and content of literature. The purpose of serious literature was to explore human thoughts, emotions, and social reality, revealing the nature of human beings and the meaning of life through in-depth description and rational thinking. Serious literature usually had profound thoughts and high literary value. The readers often needed to have a certain degree of cultural accomplishment and reading ability. On the other hand, popular literature was created to cater to the entertainment needs of readers. Its purpose was to attract the attention and interest of readers through vivid descriptions and humorous language. Popular literature was usually more difficult to read and had less literary value. The readers usually read it for entertainment. Serious literature and popular literature were very different in terms of literary form, subject matter, theme, style, and so on. Serious literature paid more attention to the quality and depth of literature, while popular literature paid more attention to the interest and legibility of reading.

What is the difference between popular fiction and serious literature?

3 answers
2024-10-04 02:21

The main difference is that popular fiction is often written for entertainment and wide appeal, with simpler plots and easy-to-read styles. Serious literature, on the other hand, usually explores complex themes and has more depth in its writing.

The difference between legitimate sons and illegitimate sons in ancient times

1 answer
2024-12-24 01:59

In ancient times, there was a clear difference between a legitimate son and a concubine's son. First of all, a Di son was a son born from the main wife, while a Shu son was a son born from a concubine or concubine. Di children enjoyed the highest status and authority in the family, and were regarded as the main line of the family and the legal heir of their father. They had the right to inherit the family's property and status. The status of the illegitimate son was lower, and he was regarded as a branch of the family and the illegal heir of his father. They had no inheritance rights and could only get a small portion of their father's property after his death. Secondly, a legitimate son had an advantage in terms of inheritance. In ancient times, the eldest son inherited the throne, which meant that the throne and property must be inherited by the eldest son. If the eldest son was no longer around, his eldest son (i.e., the eldest grandson) would also have a higher succession order than the other sons. The sons of concubines did not have the opportunity to inherit their father's title, fief, official position, or property. As a result, legitimate sons enjoyed a higher status and power in ancient society.

The difference between an illegitimate son and a legitimate son in ancient times

1 answer
2024-12-21 08:34

In ancient times, the difference between a concubine's son and a legitimate son was their status and inheritance rights. A legitimate son was the son of the main wife. He enjoyed the highest status and authority in the family and was regarded as the main line of the family and the legal heir of his father. They had the right to inherit the family's property, titles, and official positions. A concubine's son was a son born to a concubine or a concubine. His status was lower and he was regarded as a branch of the family and the illegal heir of his father. Sons of concubines had limited inheritance rights and often could not enjoy the same inheritance rights as legitimate sons. In addition, legitimate sons were more respected and honored in society. They were regarded as the representatives of the orthodox family and enjoyed a high social status and respect. Sons of concubines, on the other hand, needed to strive for social status and wealth through their own efforts and talents. In short, there were obvious differences in status and inheritance rights between the sons of concubines and legitimate sons in ancient times.

Was there a difference between classical Chinese and vernacular Chinese in ancient times?

1 answer
2024-09-20 19:36

In ancient times, there was a difference between classical Chinese and vernacular Chinese. The classical Chinese is an article written in ancient Chinese. It is one of the main forms of ancient Chinese literature and academic literature. Its grammar, vocabulary and expression are very different from modern Chinese. And vernacular Chinese refers to articles written in modern Chinese. Its grammar, vocabulary, and expression are very different from classical Chinese. In Chinese history, classical Chinese has always played an important role. It is an important part of Chinese culture and the foundation of ancient Chinese literature and academia. The vernacular was gradually developed in modern Chinese literature and academia. It became one of the main forms of modern Chinese literature and academia, and also one of the foundations for the development of modern Chinese.

Was there a difference between classical Chinese and vernacular Chinese in ancient times?

1 answer
2024-09-16 17:07

In ancient times, there was a difference between classical Chinese and vernacular Chinese. Wenyan was a written language based on ancient Chinese. It was often used in official documents, books, poems, etc. in Chinese history. On the other hand, vernacular Chinese was a language form developed on the basis of modern Chinese. It was more used for written expression and communication in daily life. Although there are great differences in language forms and expressions between classical Chinese and vernacular Chinese, they both played an important role in Chinese history.

a
b
c
d
e
f
g
h
i
j
k
l
m
n
o
p
q
r
s
t
u
v
w
x
y
z