Is there any difference in the status of the ancient Di son and the Shu son?
In ancient times, there was a difference in the status of legitimate sons and illegitimate sons. A legitimate son was a son born from the wife. He enjoyed the highest status and authority and was regarded as the main line of the family and the legal heir of his father. They had the right to inherit the family's property and status. A concubine's son was a son born from a concubine. He had a lower status and was regarded as a branch of the family and the illegal heir of his father. The son of a concubine had limited inheritance rights. He could only inherit a small portion of his father's property and could only be separated after his father died. The difference between legitimate sons and illegitimate sons was not only reflected in inheritance rights, but also in social status and treatment. Di sons had a higher social status and enjoyed more respect and honor, while the status of illegitimate sons was relatively lower and sometimes even discriminated against. Therefore, there was a difference in the status of Di sons and Shu sons in ancient times.
The pronunciation of Di son and Shu son
The pronunciation of a legitimate son is [díz], and the pronunciation of a concubine's son is [shz].
The difference between an illegitimate son and a legitimate son in ancient times
In ancient times, the difference between a concubine's son and a legitimate son was their status and inheritance rights. A legitimate son was the son of the main wife. He enjoyed the highest status and authority in the family and was regarded as the main line of the family and the legal heir of his father. They had the right to inherit the family's property, titles, and official positions. A concubine's son was a son born to a concubine or a concubine. His status was lower and he was regarded as a branch of the family and the illegal heir of his father. Sons of concubines had limited inheritance rights and often could not enjoy the same inheritance rights as legitimate sons. In addition, legitimate sons were more respected and honored in society. They were regarded as the representatives of the orthodox family and enjoyed a high social status and respect. Sons of concubines, on the other hand, needed to strive for social status and wealth through their own efforts and talents. In short, there were obvious differences in status and inheritance rights between the sons of concubines and legitimate sons in ancient times.
Di son and eldest son
Di son and eldest son were two different concepts. The eldest son was the oldest son in the family, regardless of who his mother was. A legitimate son was a son born to his wife, or a son born to his wife, but his status was slightly lower than that of a son born to his wife. In ancient China, the legitimate son had priority in inheritance, even if he was not the eldest son. The status of a legitimate son was higher because he had the priority to inherit the family property. The status and inheritance rights of the eldest son and legitimate son were determined according to the specific situation.
What was the difference between a legitimate son and a bastard son in ancient times?
In ancient times, the difference between legitimate sons and illegitimate sons was mainly reflected in their status and inheritance rights. A legitimate son was a son born from the wife. He enjoyed the highest status and authority and was regarded as the main line of the family and the legal heir of his father. They had the right to inherit the family's property and status. A concubine's son was a son born from a concubine. He had a lower status and was regarded as a branch of the family and the illegal heir of his father. The son of a concubine had limited inheritance rights. He could only inherit a small portion of his father's property and could only be separated after his father died. The difference between legitimate sons and illegitimate sons was not only reflected in inheritance rights, but also in social status and treatment. Di sons had a higher social status and enjoyed more respect and honor, while the status of illegitimate sons was relatively lower and sometimes even discriminated against. Therefore, there was a clear difference between a legitimate son and a concubine's son in ancient times.
What was the difference between a legitimate son and a bastard son in ancient times?
In ancient times, the difference between legitimate sons and illegitimate sons was mainly reflected in their status and inheritance rights. A legitimate son was a son born from the wife. He enjoyed the highest status and authority and was regarded as the main line of the family and the legal heir of his father. They had the right to inherit the family's property and status. A concubine's son was a son born from a concubine. He had a lower status and was regarded as a branch of the family and the illegal heir of his father. The son of a concubine had limited inheritance rights. He could only inherit a small portion of his father's property and could only be separated after his father died. Di sons had a higher social status and enjoyed more respect and honor, while the status of illegitimate sons was relatively lower and sometimes even discriminated against. Therefore, the difference between a legitimate son and a concubine's son was obvious in ancient times.
The meaning and status of the eldest son
The eldest son had a special meaning and status in Chinese culture. In ancient China's feudal society, the birth and growth of the eldest son was regarded as an important event and well-being of a family. The eldest son had a special responsibility and role in the family and society. He was required to respect the old and love the young, be filial to his parents, be responsible, and so on. He was regarded as an excellent quality and virtue. The eldest son was also the representative and role model of family and social ethics. In addition, the eldest son also needed to maintain the family's honor and tradition, inherit the family's culture and values, and maintain the stability and continuation of the family. In the family, the eldest son had a special status and responsibility. He had to bear the responsibility of inheriting the family's status and power, and play a leading role to lead the family to develop and grow. The eldest son was the father's right-hand man and the pillar of the family. In short, the eldest son carried the hopes and expectations of the family in Chinese culture and had an important meaning and status.
The First Son of Shu
" The Shu Eldest Son " was a novel about the identity of a Shu son. The story tells that the protagonist Xiao Wangshu, as the eldest son of a concubine, experienced all kinds of unfairness and setbacks, but he still worked hard and fell into chaos for the family and his father. However, in the end, he only became a stepping stone for his father's beloved second son. Although he had been wise all his life, he was eventually buried in a mass grave in the suburbs. The story also involved double lives and mutual redemption. The novel ended with a 1v1 ending, which brought comfort and satisfaction to the readers.
The difference between the eldest son and the eldest son
The difference between a legitimate eldest son and an illegitimate eldest son lay in their concept, status, and order of inheritance. The eldest son was the first son born to his wife, while the eldest son was the oldest son born to a concubine. In terms of status, the status of the eldest son was much higher than that of the eldest son. Regardless of whether he was the eldest son or not, as long as he was a legitimate son, his status would be higher than that of a concubine. In terms of the order of inheritance, the ancient system implemented the eldest son inheritance system. The legitimate son inherited the family's status and property before the illegitimate son. If there was no eldest son in the family, or if the eldest son died and had no descendants, then the eldest son could inherit. In short, there were obvious differences in status and inheritance rights between the eldest son and the eldest son.
The difference between a legitimate son and an eldest son
The difference between a legitimate son and an eldest son was their status and inheritance rights. The eldest son was the first son among all the sons born to the male master and his wife, while the legitimate son was all the sons born to the male master and his wife. The eldest son was the first son of the male master and his wife. The eldest son had the first right of inheritance among all the sons, followed by a bunch of legitimate sons, and finally, it was the turn of the illegitimate sons. The right of inheritance of the eldest son was unchangeable. Even if the male master remarried or had another child, the eldest son would still maintain the first right of inheritance. The status and inheritance rights of the eldest son and legitimate son were determined according to the specific situation.
The difference between a legitimate son and a bastard son
The difference between a legitimate son and a bastard son was mainly reflected in the following aspects: different birth mothers, different status, different rights, and different inheritance rights. Di son referred to the child born to the emperor's wife, while Shu son referred to the child born to a concubine or aunt who was lower than the wife. The status of Di sons was higher than that of Shu sons. They had more and greater rights and almost enjoyed priority. In terms of inheritance, the legitimate son had the qualifications to inherit his father's title, fief, official position, and property, while the illegitimate son had no inheritance rights and could only rely on the legitimate son to survive. Therefore, the legitimate son had the unquestionable right of inheritance and the highest status in the family, while the illegitimate son had no right of inheritance. He could only make a name for himself through his own efforts. Generally speaking, Di sons and Shu sons had different fates and treatment in ancient families.