Not really

Its pretty good still in my opi nion

Depends what you like in a mc, this dude just seems like an attention seeker who acts like the joker.

Thanks for that, I honestly do not know the appeal to those types of mc's

I’d consider rereading this now that the bnha is over because the ending of it is great and all I can say is the mc had a plan and that it worked out great in the end for everyone so don’t give up on the story and finish the arc. If at the end you don’t agree with me that’s fine but I bet your opinion of this story will change after finishing the arc.

I liked it though { just finished the arc }

+1

(Same Logic)

Ended very well. I feel like you only read the first two chapters

Hey idiot, reviews are for the author to know what's wrong with the novel. Anyone can write a review and it doesn't matter if they like or hate it, they gave a reason and that makes it a review, now shut up

no not really i think it's pretty good i just think if you dropped it and came back when the FF got like 100chapters your opinion will be different

It's a great arc when you read it till the end. If you think it's bad after the arc is finished I have nothing to say but if you guest started with the bnha arc than stopped you have no right to say it's bad when you don't know it all.

The reviews are important if the reviewer has read the story completely and more than 3 times. But here this reviewer did not even complete the arc and wrote a review (MHA arc bad). This is doing one thing "spreading wrong information and stopping people from approaching the book." MHA arc is perfect as its Fundamentals are "you should not judge a book by its cover", and "their is good even in seemingly bad intentions." And Mc acting like a villain was an act.

rather than saying you are gonna kill the reviewer, you should point out what is wrong with his review in a neutral tone. With that reply, you are not helping the author my Friend.

Reviews are the opinion of a reader on the story/object he's purchased/seen, there is no "Spreading wrong information" when it's just him telling the reasons he doesn't like something. Are you saying everyone has to ignore a terrible decision, something that makes the entire novel bad, just so they can write a fair review ignoring their hatred for the entire novel? Are we supposed to ignore almost criminal writing scenes just to get "The full picture"? Are we supposed to ignore blatant racism so that we can review fairly? Let me guess you also want us to read 1000 chapters of a terrible novel and just forget the 2 pages it took to ruin it for everyone who reads it? Where does it end with you, is this what you want people to do? Is there anything else you want to force us to "Fairly review" without giving a shred of originality, and no actual feeling to it? If that's what you want, then let's go to the worst novels that have ever been written, so annoying that you physically can't read another page, so bad that reading it makes you feel sick, and have you read the whole thing to give a "Fair review"

Wow someone is angry. Well, the first rule of writing a review is to read and re-read the work you are going to review. And yes a review is based upon one's personal experience regarding the work but it's based on full experience and not incomplete experience. Keep in mind that a review is a guide for potential readers. And man we are talking about this novel when did racism become a part of it, and please show me the criminal writing in this book and as per 1000 chapters goes one should make a margin like updating their review after every 50 chapters. Also, when did I say that one should write a review and exclude your emotions from it, because if you do that then it is not a review but one should remain formal while writing a review. Also if you want to see what proper reviews on 1000+ chapters worth of a book look like then visit royalro@d.

Nothing of what i said to you had any hint of me being angry, now that that part is fixed we can move on to what you said. There are no rules to writing a review, Just because he hasn't read the whole thing doesn't mean he has to complete it 2 times just to be worthy to write a review. Now that part is removed, next we'll look at the next statement. A review is based on overall experience when using/reading said object, if you have to drop it midway then it doesn't mean you have to suffer through the book just to be accepted by your outrageous claims. Saying that a review needs to be based on full experience is like saying you have to eat the whole food even if it makes you puke, it makes 0 sense and there aren't any rules to writing a review. So that sentence is removed, next is you saying that I was referring to this novel, you know I wasn't reffering to this book, all of what I said implied a more arbitrary view on some books, if you read my sentence you could tell what I meant. Trying to use my sentence by spreading false information on the views in my writing does no add to your argument. Nobody has to update their reviews, nobody has to share your views, NOBODY FEELS THE SAME AS YOU. Can you get that through your head that basically all of the reviews on this site don't share your messed up views on reviewing. If you're going to constantly ask for people to follow what you think is correct, you sound like a corrupt governemt, you've got me ticked now. Please get it through your head, the other reviews on this book don't even look the same as what you think it should be, you are outnumbered, you have no leverage here to prove your views are correct, you have nothing to continue this argument, I've disproved all of your complaints on each comment you send, go back to royalroad with that messed up "review format". Ok so that was my rant on an idiot who wont change even if I force him to see he's an idiot, I guess the saying "Never argue with an idiot, they'll drag you down to their level and beat you with experience" is 100% true by just looking at the failure God forgot to erase who decided to name himself Azurad and tried to call people angry for giving factual information and then decides to ignore it all. What was God doing when he made AzuraD, Bet it was drugs...

Yes, there are rules for writing a review.............. 1. Read, watch, or listen to the work more than once......2. Provide essential information..... 3. Take a stand......4.Understand your audience....... 5. Explain how you’re judging the work......6. Introduce evidence to support your criteria..... 7. Know the conventions of the genre....... 8. Compare and contrast....... 9. Do not summarize the entire plot................................................................................................. Rather than wasting time on the internet research on review writing.

There are no rules, I’m not going to lower myself to your stupidity so take a hint that there’s no rules