Really not my cup of tea. It tries to do too many things without successfully doing any of them. It’s got low level low effort comedy, low effort cultivation, and sincerely low effort world building. What makes this book fun? The passives and how they play out, of course. So what does the Author do? Everything else but. And when he does talk about the passives and the system, it feels reluctant and rushed. Why name the book after that if you just want a face slapping, low tier, Cultivation World? Not for me.
Liked by 14 people
LIKE
well then your taste is trash then.
hey no need for personal attacks he at least tried to explain his reasoning on why he rated it the way he did although it seems to be a personal taste review over an actual objective review about the books quality
yeah that's why i hate it, i found this a year ago didn't read the reviews, when i saw those review it got my blood boiling all they say is wrong "repetative humor" "stupied mc" etc all they said is wrong it just got me angry thats all
*nods* yea I rarely find actual reviews but eh I just say my complaints to myself and don't bother typing them for these people
I’m… confused. You’re upset at what? That I made a review about my opinion on the book? Isn’t that what a personalized review is? I’m not representing anyone or anything but myself. I laid out the reasoning for my review, and let others know what I thought. I understand if you don’t agree, but there’s no need to call someone else’s taste “trash”. That seems purposefully hateful and non constructive. I may not agree with you about this book, but I don’t wish to call your taste in literature names. Just seems a bit rude. :( Instead why not lay out the things you like about the book, so someone reading my review can have an alternative point of view before trying it themselves?
i am sorry it's just that when i saw those review of people speaking nonsense i just felt angry, anyway how many chapter did you read??, and i am pretty sure a review is about your neutral view rather than personal view.
Bruh.... A review is supposed to be personal, otherwise what meaning is there in sharing your "personal" opinion. Besides you were incredibly rude by calling his opinion "trash". I read the book. 20 chapters in and i coulndt continue. The mc is just a special type of imbecil and quite frankly, incredibly insufferable. I'd rather spend the next 20 minutes staring at a white wall then reading another. Ngl giving the book 2 Stars is purely based on grammer when i look at this review. This guy never passed 9 years education, maybe he was special ed class, who knows.
Bruh the reason why I say a review should not be personal is that it should not be personal imagine people saying one-piece has bad world-building just because it's slow-paced or bleach has bad black characters just because it has too many unnecessary episodes or naruto has bad character development just because it has too many fillers. just like you and many others just because this book has bad grammar say mc is stupid, insufferable, imbecile, etc. my guy mc will figure out the whole plan of the enemy just by receiving a few hints. says world-building is trash without even looking at the full picture of the world in the book. says hummer is bad (well I do admit some are repetitive). and my friend I learned being polite is a sin on the internet I learned it a few months ago.
