I came for the tags, but I left because of the lack of them, a slow progression romance, a typical alarmist idiot, it would be more of a slice of life for a morphing idiot.
Liked by 67 people
LIKE
Hello. While the normal reaction here would be to remove this particular comment as it's obviously spewing malice without any constructive feedback, I decided to keep it for a few reasons. First: The user here clearly shows that he either hasn't read the about section I wrote on the main page, or have not paid any attention to them. Second: He hasn't read the story otherwise he would know that with the current setup and pacing, the issue he is having (no real R-18 content in Vol 1) is not even feasible. I knew from the very beginning I will get a few trolls like these even if I do my hardest to show only positivity in my responses, as this is the internet, it still saddens me to see someone react like this. Whoever you are, I'm sure you a better person that this.
Thanks for commenting, you have saved me a lot of my time. I can tolerate a protagonist being weak, being trampled, beaten. However, he must return the pain that was inflicted on him. Or, on the contrary, give a logical explanation of why it does not, or cannot. "I cannot, because he is the heir of a duke", for example. In short, I want a 'human' as the main character, selfish, greedy, envious, but above all, intelligent. I value more the protagonists who have these traits but with a balance in which they lean more to logic. I want a human protagonist, not a hollow-headed 'Young Master' who runs like crazy in search of revenge, a slave to his emotions and impulsive character, who never stops and reflects: "Hey, why do I do this? Or why Does it happen this way? Are there alternatives? " However, the type of character I hate the most is by far the 'naive' type, above the 'young master', because at least the young master is clearer in his priorities, so he does not skimp on "methods" While the "hero" (let's call the 'naive' that way), instead, plays the moralist, but is more idealistic. "Hay, this is good, this bad, don't do it." Ridiculous, hilarious! "Good and evil" are up to us. These concepts did not exist until the human presented them. The "hero" can also be a complete fucking hypocrite at times, based on his actions, because it is unacceptable for humans to be killed, but instead if it is acceptable to kill the "demons" Anyway, I hate "heroes "are not realistic. I end this comment with this example. "They give you a choice; there are two people in danger, you can only save one, one is your father (it can be your mother the same), the other person is me, a complete stranger" From now on I tell you that I do not blame you for letting me die , I would do the same as you. That's what I'm telling you, the "hero" would try to save everyone, to end up killing us both, being realistic 😂
The content has been deleted
yeah, it was too obvious... another excuse to make mc weak
The content has been deleted
Hot dam
DarkMagik:Thanks for commenting, you have saved me a lot of my time. I can tolerate a protagonist being weak, being trampled, beaten. However, he must return the pain that was inflicted on him. Or, on the contrary, give a logical explanation of why it does not, or cannot. "I cannot, because he is the heir of a duke", for example. In short, I want a 'human' as the main character, selfish, greedy, envious, but above all, intelligent. I value more the protagonists who have these traits but with a balance in which they lean more to logic. I want a human protagonist, not a hollow-headed 'Young Master' who runs like crazy in search of revenge, a slave to his emotions and impulsive character, who never stops and reflects: "Hey, why do I do this? Or why Does it happen this way? Are there alternatives? " However, the type of character I hate the most is by far the 'naive' type, above the 'young master', because at least the young master is clearer in his priorities, so he does not skimp on "methods" While the "hero" (let's call the 'naive' that way), instead, plays the moralist, but is more idealistic. "Hay, this is good, this bad, don't do it." Ridiculous, hilarious! "Good and evil" are up to us. These concepts did not exist until the human presented them. The "hero" can also be a complete fucking hypocrite at times, based on his actions, because it is unacceptable for humans to be killed, but instead if it is acceptable to kill the "demons" Anyway, I hate "heroes "are not realistic. I end this comment with this example. "They give you a choice; there are two people in danger, you can only save one, one is your father (it can be your mother the same), the other person is me, a complete stranger" From now on I tell you that I do not blame you for letting me die , I would do the same as you. That's what I'm telling you, the "hero" would try to save everyone, to end up killing us both, being realistic 😂
Wait, what? To be honest I would assume that a baby dragon(or whatever) would be able to DESTROY a ton of things easily
The content has been deleted
A pretty bad review, I don't care if the overall star rating is accurate but review content helps a lot more than a single sentence and one star
