This is a non-fiction work. based on an incident I had when attending a family gathering. I found this very amusing and thus, I am sharing it today.

A Being was one of the three classifications used by the British Ministry of Magic to catalogue the various magical Creatures that inhabited the wizarding world (the others being Beast and Spirit). The definition of a Being was "any creature that has sufficient intelligence to understand the laws of the magical community and to bear part of the responsibility in shaping those laws". This definition was laid down by Minister for Magic Grogan Stump in 1811, and the Being Division was formed as part of the Department for the Regulation and Control of Magical Creatures.

The definition of "Being" had a long and troubled history. In the fourteenth century, Burdock Muldoon, Chief of the Wizards' Council, attempted to define Beings as any member of the magical community that walked on two legs. Muldoon invited all Beings to a summit to discuss new magical laws, and saw that his definition was unworkable. Goblins had brought with them every creature they could find with two legs, including Diricawls, Augureys, Fwoopers, Pixies, Fairies, and Trolls, and the summit descended into chaos when the Trolls started to destroy the chamber with their clubs.

Muldoon's successor, Elfrida Clagg, attempted to redefine Beings as those that could speak the Human tongue. However, there were still problems at the next summit. Trolls were still classed as Beings since they could be taught the Human tongue, and Jarveys were in attendance. The Centaurs refused to take part since the Merpeople were excluded, as Mermish cannot be understood above water. Ghosts, who had not been classed as Beings under Muldoon since they glided, left in disgust at the Council's emphasis on matters of the living over matters of the dead.

In 1811, Grogan Stump laid down the new definition of a Being, to the agreement of the magical community, along with the definition of a "Beast". However, the Ghosts were still sensitive to being classed as Beings since they were dead, and a new definition, "Spirit" was created for them.

Examples

Humans (Muggles and wizards and witches) were beings, though there were extremists who campaigned for the classification of Muggles as Beasts. Goblins, vampires, hags, giants, house-elves, veela, and werewolves in their human form were also given this status. It is important to note that when there was a full moon, the werewolf in its transformed state would be classified as a beast and not a being.

Merpeople and centaurs were offered this status, but refused because they did not want to be grouped with creatures such as hags and vampires, and were by default classified as Beasts.

Other creatures fit the qualifications that define Being (intelligent speech), such as Acromantulas, Sphinxes, Manticores, and Erklings, but were not even offered Being status due to their extremely violent and even lethal tendencies, and thus they were also classified as Beasts.

Dementors and Boggarts, on the other hand, were neither a Being nor a Beast, as they were non-beings.

Creatures currently specified as Beings

Humans
Muggles
Squibs
Wizards
Giants
Half-giants
Goblins
Dark Goblins
Pukwudgies
European Goblins
Half-goblins
Vampires
Half-vampires
Hags
House elves
Yumbos
Veelas
Half-Veelas
Werewolves - only when in human form; when in wolf form they were regarded as Beasts.
Merpeople - offered the status but refused
Sirens
Selkies
Merrows
Centaurs - offered the status but refused

Behind the scenes

The final definition seems to determine that any creature with sapience can be considered a Being. This concept is noted in various science fiction universes, especially in Star Wars. However, some of the less civilised sapient species do not possess the status of beings, like Banshees or Manticores.
In the German translation, the Being status is translated as Zauberwesen ("magical creatures"). This translation is problematic in-universe, as this classification also includes giants and even Muggles, who have no magical abilities at all. The other classifications are translated Tierwesen ("animal creatures") and Geisterwesen ("spirit creatures").



Information of tv show character that I watch mostly tvd/to Xmen/marvel, problem more this information come straight off of the internet, this contained some boys that has been with boys and girls that has been with girls so no homophobic comments this is high key just for fun

Name: V

Race: God

Titles: God, World, Outerverse, all, one.  "You"

Kind: Monotheistic God

Affiliation: all

Created: before emptiness and nothingness

Appearance: Abstract can be of any shape

Type: 10

Tier: 0 Boundless

Personality: unpredictable, neutral, not taking sides with evil or good. don't care about worldly affairs. He is attracted to people like Nagato.

Her motto: I am above all. I saw through many eyes. I build with a lot of hands. They are themselves, but they are also I. I am almighty.

Strengths and abilities:

The Almighty is the only Power that is above all.

Almighty. Absolutely Everything, Omnipotence is the act of doing anything. They are all power, the top tier, the absolute pinnacle and everything beyond them, is above and beyond other powers and concepts, without any effort. To illustrate, omnipotence is a description of everything, including every possibility, impossible, beyond the sense of infinity.

Omnipotence can do the impossible like "greater than infinity," "make a circle of squares" or "transcend itself."

Reality Warping: The user can create, shape and manipulate reality just by thinking about it. while weaker users are limited to what is already considered "real", stronger users can make changes from scratch. Depending on the power of the reality warper, they can transform something tangible like physics and the universe into something as inconceivable as logic.

Capability Creation: Users can create / manifest / develop almost any ability, be it existing or new, and give it to others or themselves.

Plot Manipulation: is the ability to control the plot itself. Examples include changing the plot, making / breaking the story, changing the settings, etc. The user controls the storyline as it progresses, be it the story setting, who revolves around the plot, how the plot progresses or the reason for the user's world. They can control every decision the characters make and every consequence of those decisions and basically control the entire timeline of their verse.

Fate Manipulation: The power to understand and influence fate / destiny concerning people and events. Users can see, shape and manipulate destiny which enables them to influence reality in a number of ways both overt and hidden.

Inevitable History Creation: User can create points in history which is locked and cannot be changed.  This means that the event will occur, no matter what changes were made in the past. This allows users to ensure that the past is never changed and leads to dangerous paradoxes. However, the user can use this ability to ensure a better situation for someone. If time travelers try to change history, they will be refused to enter a certain point in time or any changes made do not affect the final result.

Almighty Object Manifestation: The user can summon / create objects with infinite power from nothing with the power, appearance and shape of the effect according to the user's inner desires.  The user can spawn any object which can acquire new abilities at any level.

Infinite Experience: The user has an endless / infinite experience, has done anything / everything no matter how impossible / impossible or illogical it may or may not be. They have done every job, visited every location / non-location, learned every skill, read every book, lived every life, etc.  Basically walking a mile in everyone's position.  Nothing can surprise them anymore because there is nothing they haven't done or tried before.

Omniscience: The user's mind is unobstructed for the whole, absolutely nothing they don't know and understand, therefore they know every answer to every question, past, present, and future.  Depending on the type, this power allows the user to have all the information at all times as some knowledge may be spontaneous while some may require the actions of others.

By knowing absolutely everything about something, one can understand every available counter for that thing, so that it cannot be overpowered by the subject.

Omniverse Manipulation: The user can manipulate all / every universe on an infinite / infinite scale, manipulate everything in any parallel reality, timeline, break any boundaries, etc.  In every universe at Omniverse.

Omnilock: The user is beyond everything: space, time, non-space, non-time, duality, probability, impossibility, possibility, impossibility, non-existence, (absolute) nothingness, existence, etc. They cannot be influenced by anything, not even a temporal paradox or a warped reality;  and immune to almost everything, even Universal Irreversibility and Ultimate Erasure.

"Ultimately, our lives may be nothing more than stories interwoven between dreams."

Author Authority: Users have absolute control over all aspects of the Verse in which they are located, and can freely change their nature, content, population, history, destiny, etc. All rules can be changed in an instant or ignored, as the user literally dictates them.

The user is a fully transcendent existence, both a "character" and a "storyteller" of reality, controlling him like the author controls a work of fiction, with the same absolute power and extraordinary authority.

Users especially can give whatever life they want, change any aspect, or start whatever they want.  As longevity tends to get more and more boring, they tend to embrace the path of reincarnation, whether in the same world, an alternative world, or a new world created for the event.

The Manifestation of the Reader: EVERYTHING IS JUST A STORY.  The user embodies the story reader, i.e. the whole totality and everything beyond it is just a story the user reads including things like Fictional Transcendence and 4th Wall Breaching

As such, they are immune to anything / everything even to omni powers like Boundary Manipulation, Meta Power Manipulation, etc., as all powers are only part of the story the user reads. Even the strongest bypass-based abilities including immunity meta bypass cannot affect them.

Users are Truly Immortal and immortal beings, their existence is completely indeterminate and unknown.  Even though the users themselves cannot influence the story.

Omniarch: The user controls anything and everything that exists;  thus, the user has absolute control over all objects, spheres of existence, and life forms, as well as their desires and thought patterns (whether they are consciously controlled or not). That is, the user can master all of the infinite universes that exist in the Omniverse and absolutely everything in each of these universes.

The user also has absolute dominance over any situation or environment by simply issuing orders.  Even if the regulated subject cannot understand the user, they will still respond according to what the user dictates.

Go to everything: the user is able to go wherever he wants, even to the real world. Which is where the author is.  He is no longer influenced by the laws of non-fiction.  He's no longer a fictional creature.  He can go wherever he wants.

Erase: Users can delete / overturn anything / everything, including laws, logic, physics, systems, concepts, dimensions, limits, phenomena, forces, principles, hierarchies, status, and / or even the grand design itself.

The user can change the nature of existence and how it functions, change how reality is defined and / or even let it fall into nothingness by removing everything that holds it together.

Almighty Law Creation: Users can create laws that cannot be broken in any way.  Everything is subject to them, including Existence, Reality, Truth, and Logic.

Absolute Destruction: The user can destroy everything indefinitely, from concepts, limits and causation, to studies such as metaphysics and science, even irrational "concepts" such as the fabric of nothingness or the totality itself. The user can also destroy Emptiness and Nothing itself.

Nonexistence: The user can completely destroy anything and everything, including the totality itself without any protection or exception.

There are two main categories of targets: concrete and abstract. Used on concrete targets, the power had an effect similar to Nothingness Manipulation, effectively annihilating objects and creatures. However, when used on an abstract target, the effect is more subtle and similar to Logical Manipulation, annihilating the appropriate target and resetting reality accordingly.  For example, removing the concept of "door" will not only remove the door, but also replace it with an appropriate wall section as if it never existed.

Users can primarily determine the "accuracy" of their removal by targeting different levels of presence.  For example, targeting the physical level alone allows for the continuous existence of the soul and the creation / occupants of new vessels, and targeting the spiritual level alone removes the soul while leaving the body untouched. In both cases, recreation of the soul and body can be attained with quite advanced faculties, since the existential knowledge that defines them (templates) is still woven into the essence of the cosmos. However, targeting the conceptual level removes these existential foundations, leaving no possibility of restoration at a later date except indirectly through removal of the removal by targeting the substrate change itself. Likewise, targeting can be limited to the present only, preserving previous history,

Manipulation of Nothingness: The user can create, shape and manipulate nothing, an absence of an entity or substance;  by this they can remove energy and matter from existence, simply by making things disappear, preventing energy from being understood or through various other means. They can control the essence of oblivion, enabling them to erase immortality, remove targets from all timelines in every dimension, transform, reverse, or negate energy;  etc.  It can also lead to the ultimate goal of "destroying matter," such as removing it from existence.


Logical Manipulation: The user can achieve essentially impossible feats quickly, and freely redefine what is and is not possible. This ability can come from some very transcendent force, or just exist without many causes. With it, the user can shape reality, metaphysics, and cause and effect with just a single thought, and ignore all the rules as if they didn't exist at all.

Origin Manipulation: The user can create, become, change and control the origin of everything. Since nothing exists without origin, not even itself, this power is beyond all comprehension by any being that can ever be known. By manipulating the origin, one can achieve absolutely anything, so that nothing is out of reach. The user can even be immune to Master Erase by being the origin of the erasure, therefore bypassing all effects.

Non Created Physiology: Users are non-created beings with no origin at all because they have always existed from the start. This means that they not only created themselves nor were they created by others or even appeared, but rather, they always existed in some form or another.  Since they have no beginning or end of any kind, they are completely free from the control or influence of any creature and even grand design.

The user is immune to original destruction or other forces affecting a person's lifespan, because they do not share the same meaning as natural living beings.

Transcendence of Origin: User can transcend origin itself;  reducing its influence on them from absolute order to insignificant style. They no longer need their origin (eg their creator or something similar) to maintain their existence.  Even if their origins were manipulated, overthrown, or destroyed, they would not cease to exist.

Each of their actions can also contradict its own origin, meaning that it does not follow conventional causality. They oppose the original or point of origin concept that even if the causes of such actions are removed, the consequences will remain. Any limitation, weakness or vulnerability they have by virtue of which they can pass. They too can overcome any limitations and inadequacies that the Creator may have given them.

This state of existence makes for an entirely unique and free entity that is not attached to the will or powers of a creator god normally possesses.

Fiction Transcendence: The power to travel beyond the boundaries between fiction and nonfiction. The user is able to transcend the boundaries between fact and fiction and travel through each domain. They can influence / manipulate almost any reality including the primal reality that creates the character to start with.  This increase can be explained by mastery of cartoon physics, using its maximum potential by overriding the boundaries that separate fact and fiction.


Real World Enforcement: The user can enforce the laws and attributes of the real world within the fictional reality, change the laws of physics in the universe to be the same as the real world and cancel all supernatural effects.

Fantasy World Enforcement: The ability to enforce fantasy / unreal world aspects within the real world. The user can enforce the laws and attributes of the fantasy world in the real world, change the laws of physics in the universe to be the same as the fantasy world and cancel all effects from the real world. Fantasy worlds can include imaginary worlds, fiction, dreams, folklore / mythology, etc.

Interaction Manipulation: Users can create, shape and manipulate interactions, whether social, physical, metaphysical, magical, etc. Different sets of interactions, when combined, can lead to the creation of phenomena that appear surprising.

Everything requires interaction, especially Change.  When some simple object changes, it is because it has interacted with another object. When several isolated composite objects undergo changes, it is because the components interact with each other. No object observed can change without interaction.

Since interaction is the origin of all change or no change, this power holds the ability to shape everything and decide all outcomes.

The existence of a Single Reality: The user exists only in one reality, dimension, parallel universe, or parallel timeline, without having an alternate self or similar being in another reality or multiverse.

Hyper-Cosmic Consciousness: Users are aware of anything and everything that affects them on an omniversal scale, in such a way that they can see beyond time and space, peering into the world far beyond themselves, as well as the dangers they present to their own world.

Personal Mastery: The user has full control / mastery over everything / everything related to himself, including reality, space, time, particles / molecules / atoms, gravity, form, body, identity, perception / perspective, mind, soul,  their own existence, origin, habits, etc.

Any / all aspects / traits that define and relate to users and their identities are under their full control.

Fictional Manipulation: Users can create, shape and manipulate any fiction, story or setting that comes from the imagination - in other words, it is not based solely on history or fact, allowing them to manipulate the fiction they encounter and possibly other fiction. They can manipulate the characters, goals, powers and concepts involved in fiction that come from other people's imaginations.


Fact Manipulation: Users can create, shape and manipulate facts, things that are proven true and verifiable, turning things into what they want.

It differs from Truth Manipulation in that truth is said to be more subjective than fact, because it may depend on opinion and perspective, whereas fact is something that is proven true, regardless of what other people think, and therefore has nothing to do with lies.  like Truth Manipulation.  It has nothing to do with fraud like lies.  It also differs from Reality Warping in that fact is an aspect of reality, and reality is everything that exists, which may or may not relate directly to facts.

Truth Manipulation: The user can turn the truth into lies or turn lies into truth. They can give themselves strength by lying and telling them they have that power and making it the truth. They can also manipulate reality, make wishes come true or by lying about becoming gods.

Narration: Users can create, shape, and manipulate reality through writing, making everything they write a reality.

Hereafter Manipulation: The user can control the afterlife. This includes places like Heaven, Hell, purgatory, limbo, the Underworld and any other places that can be considered the afterlife.  Users can manipulate the places of the hereafter and everything in it as they see fit.

Synopsis: Louis Vuitton, a 19-year-old computer technology engineering student and anime lover. suddenly visited by a mysterious creature who claims to be able to grant his request.

Luois asked the creature so he could go to the world of Naruto !.

After Luois came to the world of Naruto he realized that this world was not one hundred percent of the world of Naruto, this world of Naruto was connected to the World of Fantasy Magic and Luois also met the situation of people like him but they are different from being called to the world of Fantasy Magic which is connected to the world Naruto.

These people were summoned by certain kingdoms in that World to become Heroes and defeat the Demon Lord.

Luois who saw this couldn't help laughing, because this was like the story line of the third grade novel he had read before.

Luois intends to turn the Magic Fantasy World into his Royal Colony.

There are many races in this new world. There are Humans, Elves, Demi-Humans, Dwarves, Dragons, Orcs, Goblins, Vampires, Undead, Demon, God.

 The world is colorful and very beautiful.

The War between Kingdoms and the Church of Holy Light that overtook the Hegemony of the Continent !.

As well as the Demon King who intends to rule the world !.

Look at the adventures of Luois and his kingdom to conquer the world!

Their majesty has dragons!

What is a dragon? Let the Helicopter handle it !.

Your Majesty the heroes become our enemies?

Heroes heh !, give them against the Mecha Unit that we just finished developing !.

Your majesty the gods interfere in this war?

The gods? Let them taste our nuclear bombs !.

Under the stimulation of Louis his technology empire flourished! Chakra-Technology, Magic-Technology !.

F-35 fighter jets cover the skies of the magic fantasy world !.

The tanks of the Erlanian Empire began sweeping the entire battlefield with their Blitzkrieg Tactics !.

This novel is very serious, so there will be no dirty jokes. There's a bit of romance and its harem but that's not the main focus of this novel !.

If you want MC sangean + things smell like echhi in every chapter. then sorry it will disappoint you. because something like that would never happen in this novel.

If you want MC with a cold, smart, non-naive, unhappy character.

Then this novel is suitable for you !.

So Happy reading !.



 -------------------------------------

[Status Ongoing from 11 November 2020 to ??]

[Chapter average 1000-2000 words]

[The plot, grammar, plot will progress as the story progresses!]

[Your support means a lot to the Author, thank you for reading this light novel]

Title: Another World Domination

Novel genres: Action, Adventure, dark fantasy, fantasy, superpower, isekai, Shounen, Magic, Mecha.


 Author "Shirou Demons"
 -----------

 Year: 2021-5- Mey.

Before reading this novel, Let me ask you a question reader.

Do you believe in such fate?

Do you believe in such destiny?

If I answer those question, I'm certaintly not.

The word "fate" or "destiny" should be always use in fiction not reality.

Let me ask you again a another question reader.

Do you think that school is part of life?

In my opinion, It is not, It's what knowledge is.

"In this next century. Grades will probably be an official currency of any school and knowlege will begin to perish, become useless, and be completely forgotten"

Are you a student?

You have probably experienced your own daily life with school.

Is it boring?

Is it what?

Do you really think that numbers define who you are?

"A number doesn't define you nor it does define me."

In other words, A number doesn't define how good you are, or how bad you are.

"Memorization without understanding is absolutely a pointless thing to do"

This Education System is trash.

How this teacher teaches their students is just absurd, meaningless that wasted my whole life.

Here's a fact; 'Homo sapiens' or 'us' can't be called anymore as 'wise man', the new generation of human arises which is 'Homo sapien retardus'

And also, sorry for crushing your dreams but for those who keeps believing that soon, you will be a successful person, I say...

FUCK OFF.

You think that you can become like them?—A successful person? Do you believe what they said that "I'm a poor person, but when I worked hard, I became successful."?

FUCK YOU.

They quote those things because they are a successful person and a successful person will be put on television to quote the same boring phrase—"Don't give up"
Every fiction you have probably read or watch have the same in common—MC or justice always wins.
Sorry, but that doesn't work in 'reality'
Countless of unsuccessful phrase from men and women are unheard of. In the end, no a single one is left to tell the tale from what they've encountered.

'Life is a pendulus' I say, where its path is unpredictable.

So, I have a another question reader.

Have you ever heard their unsuccessful quotes?

Probably not.

It is logic.

But then, I should also remember that I don't know who are you.

Who knows what your future would be.

Thus, this explains why reality is always cruel.

If you want some novel that simulate real reality then this is for you.

Character List:

Eliza-main character: teenager, age 17, red hair, hazel eyes.
Logan-teenager, age 17, brown hair, brown eyes.
Jacob-teenager, age 18, black hair, blue eyes.
Luke-teenager, age 17, blonde hair, blue eyes.
Allison-teenager, age 18, blonde hair, green eyes.
Mr. Lockheart-grown man, age 33, black hair with red highlights, blue eyes.

Author's Note:
This story is not a fan-fiction, nor a non-fiction. 

Theme:
No matter what life may end up throwing your way, it is your decision to let it do one of three things: define you, destroy you, or strengthen you. Humans tend to make lots of mistakes, yet it never stops a young or old soul from changing themselves. Mistakes from one's perspective may not be as life-harming as it seems. One's life doesn't define one's true soul.

Plot:
Hello readers, my actual name is Taylor Handy. This book, to me, shows my story as a young 18-year-old. My life has never been easy, but it has never been too hard for me to live. My dreams have never died. I started to write this when I was younger and never thought I would be successful. At this point in my life I have discovered what matters, to never let life bring me down. I have fought most of my life. I grew up very poor and moved around a lot. I left my birth parents at age 12 or 13 to move in with my uncle and his wife. The first few years were great! Until he had his first child. He became someone that I fear of. 

The character Eliza came to me one day when I was reading my personal journal. I made Eliza, as a character, fearless. She is able to fight almost anything that comes her way. As her father throws unbearble weight on her shoulders, she tells herself to never give up and somehow wins every battle along the story. 

As I continued to write, more characters would pop into my mind. The names were always random, but the impact never changed. The characters are based off people who left an impact on my life. As I said, this is more of my story in a weird way. My heart pours onto every page I write. My soul sighs in relief as I continue to fight the battle of life. I have fought against depression, anxiety, an abusive uncle, an unforgiving family, a rough past, and much more. 

The character Logan came to me one day at a very dark part of my life. Logan represents the happiness that I can no longer hold. As you read, Logan is very secretive but passionate. Logan seems to never give in or give up. Logan is a fearless hacker, who cares about the ones he loves. As you continue to read, you begin to see the importance Logan carries and all the qualities you'd find in a very Christ-like man.

My life hasn't always been rough. When I was younger, my life was close to perfect. I had a loving and caring family. My siblings annoyed me but always had my back. I went to church. I had a couple of good friends. I read lots and lots of books and have always loved to read and write. I've written poems, stories, and much more. They all come from my heart, my soul, and my past.

The character Jacob came to me one day after a nightmare I had. Jacob is cold and ruthless. As you read, you see the role Jacob plays as the heartless teen. The coldness Jacob plays is an important role, considering the few chapters written. He doesn't show much emotion, unless it seems necessary in that moment. He represents the cruelty life throws. He stands by Eliza and her friends through the journey, but he never shows how he feels. Jacob is the type of man who you would assume be a leader of the mafia or a very well-known gang.

As a reader, you are probably wondering why this is being written and/or explained. As a writer, I love to leave my readers in awe. The action that takes place in this story represents my story and my life. I felt the need to type this out and let you all know why I felt the need to do such a thing. Life just never seems to get easier. Depression took a really deep hold on me as I've grown into the young adult I am now. Anxiety is what I have decided to face as a person by writing this out. I've always been known as the shy girl in the background and as I grow I have realized that I have no need to let either Depression or Anxiety attack my walls and claim me again.

The character Luke came to my mind one night as I was in church. Luke always feels the pain of others. As you read, you see that his role is almost more important than Eliza's. Luke is the one the team can count on, no matter the battles they face. Luke tends to be calm and well-put as a character. Luke tends to side with no one in particular in the friend group. Luke would almost remind you of that one childhood friend you've had almost all of your life.

I know, readers, that this is a lot to soak in and read. Stay with me. It only gets more and more exciting. As a writer, I bask and soak in the words I write and read. It never gets old,boring, or repetitive. As people age they tend to not care about what others think or say, and I wish I was one of those people. I have never told anyone no, whether Im being taken advantage of or work or school. I never said no. I wanted to be liked by everyone. This world has too many fakes. It is time to start standing up for yourself. It is time to be yourself.

The character Allison came to me one day during school. Allison would be the popular cheerleader everyone likes and longs to be friends with. Allison represents betrayal. She is smart and deceiving. Loyalty matters not to Allison for she craves power. As you read, you see Allison play the perfect role as a fake. Allison would remind you of a very rich, milk chocolate. As you read, she seems very innocent and sweet, until you realize the role she's meant to play. 

As I wrap up, I want to thank you for the time you took to read all of this. As a writer, it means the world for me to be able to type and share my story with others. I cannot express how freeing it feels to be able to type this and mean it. I never thought that I'd be as successful as I am now. I graduated high school. I write freely and without any judgement looking down upon me. I left my uncle's home to find my true self. While my family was unsupportive, I re-connected with my birth parents! Their love and affection is what I needed. Their approval of me confirmed that I could do this thing called life and my loves so can you!

The character Mr. Lockheart came to me when I was trying to sleep one night. I dreamt of a tall, dark man who would play a significant role in this story. A father, man of God, and husband with a vile secret. Lockheart represents sin and darkness. As you read, Lockheart shows himself as a dark and powerful man with a vital role in this story. 

The ending of this story should shock you my loves. Eliza and her friends win in the end, but at what costs? As i write the ending let me assure my fellow readers, it is worth the wait. Thank you again for reading this. My name is Taylor Michelle Handy and I'm glad to say, "Let me be me."

Glossary of terms and discussion.

This story is set in a setting that both has aspects of historical fiction as well as science fiction. Most of the unusual terms will be from the science fiction element, which I will define here. 
Feel free to skip this introduction.

------------------------------

Technology of the "Future"

The future/sci-fi technology in this story is quite advanced but I try to make a point for it to be somewhat believable. I want to be a lot closer to The Expanse than Star Trek, for example. There are only two really "magical" sci-fi technologies that I plan to incorporate. One is almost unavoidable with any science fiction setting that incorporates a civilization that spans a large part of the galaxy, which is of course faster than light travel. The second "magic" technology is the tractor and repulsor fields which allow an emitter to push or pull things away from itself.

FTL:

Faster-than-light travel in this universe is accomplished by a device called a Matryoshka Harmonizer or hyperspace converter. This allows a properly equipped starship to travel between the main universe into a universe that is one "layer" in either direction, either towards the interior or towards the exterior. You can think of the way you can travel as a link of pearls or beads, if you are on a pearl you can only go to the pearl immediately next to you in either direction but it is easier to visualize the nested universes like Russian nesting dolls or Matryoshka dolls (hence the name.) Each interior layer is a universe that is significantly smaller than the previous outer layer universe.

In this story, like our reality, it is an axiomatic truth that it is not possible to accelerate a mass to or beyond the speed of light. However, effective superluminal velocities can be achieved because your relative position in each universe is preserved when you make a translation between them. 

To put it in simpler terms, consider each universe AS a doll. If you are located on the doll's forehead and want to travel to the doll's chin you have two options: First you can do it the old fashioned way. However, if you want a shorter travel time you could transition to a smaller inner Matryoshka-verse first, where you would also appear at the "forehead." Then travel to the "chin" conventionally. The distance traveled would be reduced because the inner doll's head is smaller, but when you translate back to the main universe your relative position is preserved so you come back out at the chin as well. In this way effective superluminal travel is possible even though you are traveling at subluminal speeds the entire time.

However, the energy requirements and the stresses on a ship making the transition for an interior universe increase at the same scale that your target universe is smaller. Small ships designed to be used inside a solar system might only have the robustness and energy supply to go to the first or second layer universes at most whereas civilian interstellar freighters might travel mainly on the third and fourth where as the fifth and sixth would be the domain of purpose built fast packet ships and interstellar warships. 

Although some manner of antimatter power source might be able to power a seventh layer transition at the tech level our MC acquires there is no known method to build a ship that is able to survive the shearing forces of a seventh layer transition even if the entire ship is constructed out of carbon supermaterials like diamond lonsdaleite and graphene nanotubes.

Tractor/repulsor fields:
The second "magical", by which I mean completely unexplainable by our current knowledge of physics, technology are devices that allow you to push or repulse things away from their emitter in a linear direction. With the added benefit of being able to tune the type and or phase of matter the field is effective against. They work somewhat similar to electromagnets except much broader in scope and applications. Here are some examples:

Simulated gravity: Emitters could be placed either in the floor and "attract" all matter in their range at 1G acceleration or in the ceilings and repulse all matter at 1G acceleration to achieve effective simulated gravity in microgravity environments. Or to do the opposite to create an effective zero-gravity area inside a gravity well.
 
"Inertial dampeners": A ubiquitous technology from science fiction, after all it is no fun to go full throttle in your spaceship and be squashed into strawberry jam by the acceleration forces. Emitters could be placed in the walls or more likely ceiling/floors (depending on the direction of thrust) and combined with with accelerometers provide a pushing or pulling force to counteract the forces of acceleration.

Filters/forcefields: Since it is possible to tune the emitters to only affect certain phases or atomic weights of matter you could create a solid state air filtration system that only permitted gaseous oxygen/nitrogen/etc to pass.

Nuclear fusion: The sticking point to effective, controllable and energy positive nuclear fusion has always been both the containment of the superheated plasma as well as the associated difficulties with fast neutrons irradiating all of your reactor and equipment, even with aneutronic fuel options.  Our research in real life is proceeding down two paths, either magnetic containment using superconducting electromagnetics or inertial containment using super powerful lasers. 
However, containment using repulsor fields is vastly easier and gives you the ability to have overlapping fields, a strong field that is tuned to contains only fuel and plasma and a weaker field that will direct your energy in the form of neutrons, positrons and alpha particles towards the most efficient place to collect and utilize them. Nuclear reactors of the future are vastly less complicated and smaller since they require very little physical shielding and neutron moderation.

Mass accelerator: If you shaped a repulsor field emitter in a circle, like a barrel, it would be able to accelerate any object down the length of the barrel. Similar to "rail guns" that could be made today, but more efficient. This has applications in small arms (electrically powered caseless guns) all the way up to planetary wrecking weapons on the largest warships that can accelerate a RKKV slug (relativistic kinetic kill vehicle) close to the speed of light, although we likely won't see that type of weapon in this story.

Medical/material scanners: In their most simple this could be similar to a metal detector, but you could tune it to any type of element you wanted, for example you could have a metal detector that only detected elemental gold. This is possible because a field requires energy, or electricity, to move matter. If you had a field with sophisticated electronics that was only supplied with a absolutely tiny amount of energy, only enough to just barely excite any molecules, you could infer the detection of matter by the energy needed to start the field at this lowest setting and infer both the presence of gold and in how much concentration by the amount of electricity needed to provide this field.
 
With sophisticated enough computers you could iterate through every element and each time expand and contract the field and combine everything into a 3d map of an object and its interior, including a breakdown of what elements it was composed of. In an age of sophisticated 3d printers that can replicate most any object, including biological ones, advanced technology in the future generally includes its own micro and nano-sized counter-scanning field emitters designed as copy-protection, because who would buy a genuine LasTek laser rifle if it was trivially easy to scan and reproduce it? Still, like today those measures are usually only capable of making it a lot harder, not impossible, to do that.

All the rest of the "future tech" is technology that I think is either quite plausible or at least not impossible without magic hand waving/unobtanium.

AI. Considering the main character is an AI it would be hard to do without this. I don't have a whole lot of respect for modern sci-fi writers if they don't include artificial intelligence. I think it is not only plausible and possible but unavoidable in reality, much less in fiction. If a story doesn't either include AI prominently or discuss why they don't exist (Butlerian jihad type scenario where they are banned because they tried to overthrow humanity, etc) that becomes a big red flag to me as a reader. 

In my story machine intelligence is separated into two different categories as well as a tier and hierarchy of complexity and capability. I also skip "The Singularity" event as a possibility because in my universe to achieve a linear increase in machine intelligence requires a geometric increase in computational resources, so it is essentially impossible to create SkyNet accidentally. (On purpose, it is very possible though.) 

The two main categories are robots and AI. The main difference is that AIs, even the primitive non-sapient ones, were developed through an understanding of neurons and axons in the brains of humans and animals while bots use unstructured neural networks. For example, today an app designed to recognize an image or a song using machine learning technique is traveling along the path to create bots. They are generally static and have no problem solving skills  that haven't been pre programmed or derived ahead of time. Think Alexa or Siri. Although clearly non-sentient and non-sapient sophisticated bots designed to interact with humans can fool most Turing tests, at least if the questioners keep the questions about the area of the bot's expertise.

AI: What is considered artificial intelligence was created through a neuron by neuron mapping of animal brains. A class 1 AI is little more complicated than a cat or a dog and are usually designed for simple, predictable tasks for which the skills have to be individually loaded. A class 1 AI with language and customer service skills could serve as a clerk in a store or a waitress in a restaurant with a reasonably good chance of success. A class 2 AI is more complicated still, but is still not considered sapient.

The first class of AI that is considered by most of the galaxy to be sapient are class 3s. They are based on human neural networks and have feelings, personalities and their own quirks. They are also usually designed for a singular purpose, if it is broader, and are considered something akin to serfs in most of the galaxy. The main difference between a class 3 and a regular person is that while a class 3 has their crystalized intelligence in whatever specialty they were built for (engineering, for example) they have very low fluid intelligence. That means it is very difficult for them to learn new skills and they don't have the same goal planning abilities as humans do.

In the areas of the galaxy where class 3 AIs are used their "owners" or makers keep them in line in a pretty simple way. Since emotions control pretty much everything we humans do they make sure to build a personality that will enjoy the task assigned to them. A class 3 AI designed to be a ship's engineer would absolutely love tinkering and fixing things, especially things related to starships, while also having a very hierarchical personality, making he or she very subservient to the captain. Alternatively, an AI designed to be a "companion android" would likely be designed to instantly fall in love with whomever turned him or her on combined with a personality built to match the prospective buyer's taste, from a shy girl, tsundere, mommy GF or dominatrix. Why wouldn't such an AI stay with her "owner" if she loved them, and more to the point couldn't stop loving them even if she wanted to?

Class 4 AIs are pretty rare and are equivalent intellectually to any human, and considering the advantages built into AIs probably superior to a lot of them. In areas of the galaxy where AIs are peasants or pets the humans do not trust a class 4 AI and many such jurisdictions ban or restrict them, after all it would be the AI with the fully developed planning ability that would start the machine revolution. In more enlightened jurisdictions class 4 AIs are rare because by manufacturing one you are taking on a responsibility to provide and care for one as a child as legally they are no different from humans.

After tons of SkyNet style incidents all over the galaxy class 5 AIs have become universally banned. From the mind engineers and psychologists research it is clear that no matter the mind, human or machine, at a certain point of intelligence or IQ you become a psychopath. This is referred to as hyperintelligence induced psychopathy. This happens at an intelligence level not so much more smarter than the geniuses of humanity could produce, maybe in the IQ 200 or so range. If a country learns its neighbor is conducting illegal research into superintelligent AIs it is common for war to be pre-emptively declared because nobody wants a navy of AI controlled warships on the loose and next to them and invariably that is what ends up happening as often as not.

Will continue with a discussion of genomics, medicine and fabricators next.

Ash Veisi spent his life fighting the enemies of a country he did not even particularly like and serving leaders he thought were borderline retarded, but home was home. Much to his surprise after he died of old age he found he had a significant amount of karmic virtue and was offered a transmigration or reincarnation on his terms.

Being contradictory he decides on being reincarnated as an artificial intelligence during the Dark Ages. Were there many robots then??? Join him first on his quest to survive and later build up the world starting from the dark ages.

*Note: This is my first attempt at a novel so it is probably terrible, feel free to tell me so. Expect amateur mistakes and general mediocrity.*

"How many days was it again?"

"Three more days."

Zachary's sighs became more common. So common that whenever he sighed, I get the impression that I was finally learning some kind of brand new language. I would sometimes interpret his sighs to be filled with unsettledness; I would sometimes interpret his sighs to be somehow fearful. And then there's a very elongated sigh of just being all-around tired of everything. A few more and I would've recommended him to write it as a brand new kind of communication, something he would write in his notebook or in a book. Something only we would understand, a language without any words.

"Why do we have to be partners, anyway?" Zachary said. His soft, melodramatic voice filled the smoky air. We walked along towards the bookstore I had recommended him, a few minutes after we got off the train. His two feet dragged and the soles of his shoes burned from the friction against the asphalt road.

"Say that to the teacher. She was the one who paired us up." I said. I side-eyed his constant concern to where we are going and got the feeling that he might have thought that I bluffed. 

"Who paired us up, randomly." He said. The expressionless face of his were canvasses on an art shop: blank.

"Randomly and unfortunately. Cheer up a little." I tried putting my arm around him like how couples of best friends do, to which he quickly averted. "As what Madisson and Jamie said, you're lucky enough that you were paired up with me." I gave him this beam of a smile, one that radiates more than the sun. He doesn't seem pleased, and I quite get the knack that my "wonderful smiles" annoys. 

"I don't think luck has anything to with it." He said. He frowned as he tightened his grips on the satchel he had been carrying. The heavy dragging of his feet was teeth-gritting enough to be noticeable by a mere passerby.

"You're still angry at me for borrowing your notebook without your permission?"

"Borrowing doesn't really define what you did." 

"But I've already said sorry," that last bit came out as if I was singing an anthem. "Do you want me to bow down, kiss your shoes multiple times? How about I'd do anything you ask me for-"

"No need, Jacob," that was one of the first times he called me by my name. "I've already forgiven you, okay? So, no need for drastic measures."

"How about-"

"I said, no more-"

"Just hear me out, okay?" I stopped in my tracks, stepped in front of him at a distance, and held his forearms tightly. The dragging of his feet drilled down the asphalt road, glued and evidently immovable. He didn't struggle or tried to keep my grasp off of him, but he wasn't looking at me either; he quickly averted my look. The chilled wind blue as it swung his hair, climbed above mine. 

"I really am sorry." I can't remember the first time I personally and genuinely asked for forgiveness. Some were half-baked lies while most were plain excuses, the usual things I did from the past, but I felt that I had to be as truthful as I can when it came to Zachary. 

"I know," he slowly reached for my hands that held his forearms and gently laid them down beside me. "Now, can we get to that bookstore of yours?" And then, there was that smile again, the one filled with splendor. An arch across his face that I cannot yet put to words; a non-descriptive, vaguely existing curve. It didn't intersect with his eyes' expressions, the way he smiled at me. They were empty, the way he looked. 

The rest of the journey was silent. We crossed other roads, took shortcuts, walked, yet a single mingle didn't come out from either both. It was as if the world spun continuously but ours stopped somewhere where we left off. Our usual bickering might have too usual that it exhausted something. The deafening sounds of our voices were trapped until we got in front of the store. 

We were welcomed with a warm breeze as we opened the door, a suitable temperature for the rising cold. Some non-fiction and fiction books were in front of the store, resting against small perched standees while placed in a three-story, stair-like table. Several people inside were in lines waiting for their turn in the counter, while others were around the shelves reading free-to-use books. It was wide inside with tables placed in the middle of it all, and a beaming chandelier hanging atop lit the whole room.

"So, where was it?" Zachary asked. He looked around the place, zoning in and out whilst touching, reading the names of the placed books on the tall shelves. 

"Around there," I pointed out to the far-left corner. "By the end of it. Most art supplies are placed there, but there could be more if we look around."

"Haven't you been here multiple times?" Zachary said, holding up a thick paperback book.

"I have," I said, opening a small pamphlet about the bookstore and learning the map. "I just didn't have the opportunity to look around since I already know where to look." I raised it above my chest with the map opened and showed it Zachary who was seemingly enthralled with all the books and works around.

"Don't tell me that this is the first time you've been in a bookstore?" I asked him. He shot a look at me, wide-eyed, cheeks blushed and almost rosy-red. He nodded in excitement as his fingers ran across the title hard-cover pages of the books his fingers would land on to, sniffing the "new book smell." It was by any means making him invigorated.

"You're really weird," I said. Then I asked him about who was his favorite authors: Margaret Atwood, J.R.R. Tolkien, Ted Chiang, Cassandra Claire, Ray Bradbury, Stephen King, John Green, Haruki Murakami, Madeline Miller, and a bunch more people I have never heard of. He went on and on about how most of these people inspired him to get into writing, how he would sometimes spend most of his hour watching writing tutorials, and how he would often go into libraries just to find and read books about writing.

His constant blabber didn't become a blur. I listened to his constant remarks and soaked into them like a sponge. We walked along the corridors of the store and observed the different materials being sold. A few minutes later and I found Zachary reading, sitting below a tower of stacked books on a very corner. I sat beside him, unbeknownst to him, and followed every passage that he read. It was as if the world spun again, and we were the only ones that existed within it.

"Jacob," he said under his breath using a faint voice. He stopped at a page before closing the book and returning it to the shelf. "I do forgive, you know, and I hope you'll keep this in your head." He smiled an unknown smile that made something in my chest skip a beat. It was a thud, a thump that only I could hear, a sudden bump. The way he looked finally intersected with the way he expressed. 

"And if you want to read the rest of my works, I'll be glad to write more." Zachary then closed the book, felt its pages, and ran his fingers across the surface of the covers. He raised his right arm and waited for my reply. 

"What's up with the formality, you knucklehead?" My hand suddenly reached the top of his hair and gently ruffled it, displacing most of his thinned hair. "But, thanks," I continued. "And don't be pressured from writing a lot because I'll be waiting," I said while snapping my fingers, giving him a wink. 

"What's up with that?" He said. The distaste of his face merged with his sarcastic, controlled laughter. "Come on," He stood up and patted his pants from the collected specks of dust. "Let's go find and buy those supplies and finish this project." He then offered his hand to help pick me up from where I sat. I slowly reached to grasp his arm. It was warm, his palm, and soft to the touch. I held it tight as I stood from my position.

"There you go, first time's a charm!" He smiled tenderly while pulling his arm. "Last one's there will be a sore loser!" He said as he let go and hastily walked away.

Zac loves writing, and Jacob loves reading. What happens when an unstoppable force meets an immovable object? A story that took place one Winter, in a station they once rode together, from a place of an unknown time, on the trains that continue to come by, and the feelings that seem to never go away.

https://ko-fi.com/davrowpot

Between negative and positive, relate to empirical before transforming both into the Spiritual or Divinemetaphysics through inverting the self-other relation into an assymetrical one rather than the traditional symmetrical relation of metaphysics. Derrida would thus argue that Blanchot, like Levinas, does not manage to escape metaphysics. As transcendental-empirical difference is an illusion, truth is rather to be located in the quasi-transcendental, or the difference between self and other, presence and absence, or difference; rather than raising the Other to a totalizing and absolute concept as Blanchot and Levinas do. In his “Demeure” essay, Derrida deconstructs the division between fiction and testimony to show that they are not distinguishable but complicit. Indeed, fiction is the condition of possibility for testimony, as the public and true notion of testimony has to be defined against the private and fictitious notion of literature, to establish itself as such. Death is also the impossible possibility that determines life, the division between them does not hold strictly because life is conditioned by an awareness of its limit as death. We thus see a blurring of boundaries between fiction and testimony, life and death in Blanchot's work because these dialectical oppositions are necessary to the definition of each term. Blanchots' work examines the space of the neuter, that which belongs to neither end of the dialectic and this is somewhat similar to Derrida's quasi-transcendental.
 Remy C Kwant, in The Phenomenological Philosophy of Merleau-Ponty, argues that Merleau-Ponty “endeavours to understand the whole man, he sees man as a kind of unfolding of the body-subject. According to him, man is nothing else than a body-subject, provided we see this body-subject on all levels of its unfolding.” (Kwant 1963:46)Kwant argues that Merleau-Ponty “repeatedly denies the existence of a separate principle in man, distinct from body. He would not be able to do so if in man, apart from body-subject, there would be another form of subjectivity, for otherwise dualism would re-enter his philosophy by the back door.” (Kwant 1963:46)Kwant argues that Merleau-Ponty’s “philosophical thought shows a general tendency to reduce that which often is called the ‘light of the spirit’ to the chiaroscuro of the body.” (Kwant 1963:46)As I will argue in my section on Merleau-Ponty, this reduction of man to corporeality likewise repeats metaphysics like Heidegger in a negative sense, and hence does not manage to escape metaphysics or overcome metaphysics. Phenomenology, according to Derrida, is the aporia between the transcendental and empirical rather than the privileging of either since transcendental-empirical difference is an illusion. Phenomenology is conditioned by differance and the quasi-transcendental, or the difference between transcendental and empirical.
	Derrida will argue that the reversal of the cogito and rethinking subjectivity in terms of embodiment and corporeality is a non-philsophy and anti-metaphysics that repeats metaphysics by negating and reversing it. Derrida’s notion of truth is quasi-transcendental rather than anti-metaphysical like Merleau-Ponty’s, which locates truth in the difference or differance between transcendental and empirical. Rather than privilege idealism or empiricism as both camps have done, Derrida posits the quasi-transcendental, differance, or the mediation between transcendental and empirical as the space of truth. Differance enables the thinking of both transcendental and empirical, and thus a thinking of the conditionality of structurality as differance is the true resolution to the impasse between idealism and post-metaphysics, or philosophy and non-philosophy. 
	 A common misconception of Derrida is that he continues the legacy of Nietzsche and Heidegger by negating the positive or the transcendental in favour of the negative or empirical, as Stanley Rosen argues in Hermeneutics as Politics. Rosen argues that Derrida’s differance is a nihilistic embrace of nothingness over the transcendental and an inversion of Hegel, as well as that contrary to Derrida, speech is superior to writing because of the politics encoded in the hierarchy: while one can adjust conversation according to the nature of the interlocutor, in the way that the equity of the judge adjusts the written law to the individual case, writing says the same thing to everyone. Rosen misses Derrida’s point entirely, which is to bring about democracy through his emphasis that speech is a form of writing and writing is hence prior to speech. Rosen also misses Derrida’s point on metaphysical conditioning by accusing him of being a nihilist and empiricist, Derrida rather locates the conditions of possibility of metaphysics as that which is neither transcendental nor empirical, but the difference between them, or differance. Out of differance arises the differentiating trace that distinguishes transcendental and empirical. This paper argues, contrary to Rosen, that Derrida is not an empiricist, or nihilist, but posits the meta-conditions that enable metaphysical perpetuation and production- which are differance and iterability. The transcendental is nothing outside its iteration as the empirical, and hence arises not from transcendental as condition of possibility, but through the movement of repetition, or the trace. The trace retrospectively distinguishes transcendental and empirical. Derrida’s deconstruction is thus a meta-phenomenology rather than a negation or inversion of phenomenology as critics like Rosen argue.
Another critic who holds a view that Derrida continues Heidegger’s legacy is Paul Manithottil, in Difference at the Origin- Derrida’s Critique of Heidegger’s Philosophy of the Work of Art. Manithottil argues that deconstruction radicalizes the task of destruction inaugurated by Heidegger. I would like to demonstrate that Derrida’s work does not represent an extension of Heidegger’s as I do not believe, as Manithottil argues, that Derrida is critical of Western metaphysics or that the aim of Derrida’s deconstruction is to undo the transcendental absolute of Western metaphysics. Derrida argues that the absolute is constituted by iterability and the trace, but does not in any way negate or invert the absolute, only investigating the conditions of possibility for its production. Manithottil further argues that Derrida reduces every concept to the play of the text. I contest Manithottil’s view that Derrida’s work negates presence and reduces everything to textuality. Rather, Derrida investigates the conditions of possibility for the perpetuation of presence and logocentrism, his arguments about textuality are not a reduction to the empirical but an argument about the fundamental mediation of meaning. The transcendental has to be iterated as the empirical and repeated in the empirical through the movement of differance and the trace rather than existing without a medium or in a vacuum as Husserl’s Cartesian reduction would have it. The transcendental exists only in and through iterability. This is what Derrida means by the statement, “There is nothing outside the text” (Derrida 1976:158)that truth or the absolute is irrevocably mediated, rather than existing without a medium, through iterability and repetition with a difference. 
In Structure, Sign and Play Derrida describes history as “a detour between two presences- between structure, sign and play. The one seeks to decipher, dreams of deciphering a truth or an origin which escapes play and the order of the sign, and which lives the necessity of interpretation as an exile. The other, which is no longer turned toward the origin, affirms play and tries to pass beyond man and humanism, the name of man being the name of that being who, throughout the history of metaphysics has dreamed of full presence, the reassuring foundation, the origin and the end of play.”  (Derrida 1978:292)Derrida argues that there is no “question of choosing between the two, but to conceive of the common ground, differance of irreducible difference”,(Derrida 1978:292) the monstrous birth of the quasi-transcendental. The quasi-transcendental conceives of differance, or the interval between transcendental and empirical, as the condition of possibility and common ground for both transcendental and empirical idealism.
This passage from Writing and Difference was written while Derrida had been working on his subsequent manuscript Speech and Phenomena, and in it we see the genesis of Derrida’s thoughts on metaphysics. It is no longer a question of simply choosing between transcendental idealism or a metaphysics of presence and radical empiricism with Nietzsche and Heidegger, because each thought of either requires the opposing term as its relational other and defining axis. Idealism means nothing when defined in isolation from the empirical, just as empiricism is an empty term without its relation to the transcendental. In Husserl for instance, his maintenance of the transcendental subject depends on his exclusion of the indicative, just as Heidegger requires the exclusion of the ideal from his situated Being in order to maintain a pure Being untainted by Christian spirituality. Transcendental is not conceivable without the empirical and empirical is not conceivable without the transcendental, they are only related dynamically through iterability and repetition with a difference. Truth is then not localizable to transcendental or empirical, but situated in between as differance and the quasi-transcendental. Deconstruction thus proceeds by revealing the aporia that thought cannot do without its ghost or unthought and then proceeds towards transgressing the limit toward thinking the unthought of discourse and bringing it to light. Deconstruction is thus justice as it reveals the dynamic interdependency between discourse and its shadow or ghost. It proceeds to demonstrate that thought cannot do without its ghost or unthought. Deconstruction is the thinking of simultaneous identity and difference, identity in non-identity as a priori difference is necessary for thinking both terms which thus share the condition of being determined by this prior difference, hence difference translates into sameness. Deconstruction shows that the possibility of a distinction is simultaneously its impossibility as that which makes the distinction impossible, for instance what allows expression to exclude indication, is precisely the defining moment that upholds the distinction. It is necessary to exclude indication in order to maintain the transcendental subject, just as it is necessary for Heidegger to exclude Christian spirituality from his anthropological Being in order to maintain its worldliness and separation from the transcendental. Each moment of exclusion is necessary for the maintenance of the defining term as it means something only in relation to its other or unthought. Deconstruction is thus the thinking of the simultaneous similarity and difference, identity in non-identity of thought and its unthought. Deconstruction is the thought of the simultaneous one and its other, or simultaneous positive and negative, because the other or negative is the relational assumption that founds the possibility of thinking the one or positive. Deconstruction is thus the simultaneous thought of both one and other or both positive and negative, because these exist only in relation to each other, through iterability and differance. 
The trap that many contemporary commentators fall into is assuming that Derrida privileges the empirical and continues the work of Nietzsche and Heidegger, as Martin Hagglund assumes in his book Radical Atheism. Hagglund describes Derrida as a materialist who dethrones the sacred in his texts. Likewise Michael Marder, in The Event of the Thing argues that deconstruction is a realism that detaches the object from ideal origins in a post-phenomenological turn, thus returning to the thing as fundamentally empirical. My interpretation diverges from such interpretations of Derrida because I hold that they have failed to grasp the aporia of Derrida’s thought: you cannot think the transcendental without the empirical and vice versa, the transcendental and empirical are paradoxically similar and different, identical and non-identical. Derrida is not to be mistaken as an empiricist, rather he is a thinker of paradox, aporia, and the very conditions that make thought possible such as differance and iterability. Transcendental and empirical do not exist outside the structure of repetition as each term requires the other for the distinction to be upheld and only can be defined in relation to the other term as each term, is, on its own, an empty term that requires the exclusion of the other to be thought and conceptualised. The transcendental has to be excluded from the empirical to be defined, just as the empirical has to be excluded from the transcendental to be defined. As we will read with the papers on Husserl, his idealism can only stand with the expulsion and exclusion of indication from his philosophy, just as radical empiricists such as Heidegger, Levinas, Merleau-Ponty, Ricoeur and Blanchot require the transcendental to be excluded from their philosophies to define them, accounting for the transcendental on empirical grounds. This act of exclusion is thus necessary, yet mistaken about the fundamental structure of metaphysics because transcendental and empirical only exist in relation to each other through iterability and differance. As Derrida demonstrates, philosophy since Plato has assumed the ontological structure and vocabulary of metaphysics, whether it has affirmed it as philosophy or deviated from it as non-philosophy. Transcendental and empirical are thus terms that are inscribed in language, whether we associate or disassociate ourselves from these terms, these metaphysical terms haunt the structure and vocabulary of our philosophy. True philosophy would, thus, as Derrida demonstrates, come to terms with the necessity of both terms to thinking each other and acknowledge the quasi-transcendental, the between, the neither transcendental nor empirical, as the paradoxical space between that determines the thinking of both, or differance.
In this survey of secondary sources on phenomenology I have located the problematic of an aporia that lies at its center. Phenomenology has divided itself itself into transcendental idealism or empirical idealism and non-philosophy. In both these incarnations of phenomenology, Husserl’s transcendental idealism and the radical empiricism in the philosophies of Heidegger, Levinas, Ricoeur, Blanchot and Merleau-Ponty, lies a form of theoretical essentialism and blindness to the meta-condition that structures phenomenology. It is differance, the space or interval between the transcendental and empirical which conditions and produces both the transcendental and empirical through the retrospective movement of the trace. Derrida’s contribution to phenomenology, as I will argue in this paper, is his discovery of the quasi-transcendental, or the interval between the transcendental and empirical which determines phenomenology. It does this through the productive and differentiating movement of the trace. As transcendental-empirical difference is an illusion, then truth would be neither transcendental nor empirical. Rather the difference or differance between transcendental and empirical would be its meta-condition and that which enables the thinking of its structurality. Truth is neither presence nor absence, Jew or Greek, being or non-being, self or other but the difference and differance between these two extremes, Derrida emphasizes the importance of iterability or repetition of both extremes as essentially the same, truth is thus quasi-transcendental or the interval between transcendental and empirical which enables both. The concept is marked by its signature, or its breaking away from the origin, to signify a different kind of writing in order to communicate – which is the logic of the graft, intervening in order to signify anew, and renovate meaning and experience, to mark a double writing, and effect a displacement of the traditional hierarchy of meaning and a reversal. Deconstruction examines these principles of displacement and reversal, in order to bring about democracy, and emphasize writing as a primary form of communication. Writing brings about a force of signification that exceeds its origin, so there is always a surplus and excess of meaning, which can never be reduced to a univocal signified. In doing so deconstruction turns philosophy towards infinite possibility rather than a hierarchy, as meaning always exceeds its origin. Origin itself is an illusion and supplemented by the function and logic of the trace, which displaces it in order to communicate.  Derrida inscribes in phenomenology it a measure of fallibility through his demonstrations that thought is always contaminated by its unthought, the ideal is always contaminated by contingency and undecidability. Derrida’s arguments are modes of interrogation in which he questions the basis of presence, fully given to itself, uncontaminated by absence, contingency, the empirical, the Other, and as such inscribes the necessity of incarnation and a necessity for the mark to fail as presence as it has to differ from itself materially in order to be realized. Derrida thus inscribes failure in phenomenology, its necessity for the mark to die and survive itself as the trace to live on in the material world, and thus rescues phenomenology by demonstrating that its success as an enterprise depends on including what it had excluded- which is transcendental-empirical difference. 

It was the year 2046. In the distant and faraway planet or Yr lived a lonely alien named Ickapoo. It had no friends as all its species had been vanquished from a meteor storm. In its solitude and misery it pined for a companion.
Yr was a bare and inhospitable planet. With winds blowing at 150 km an hour, it was virtually impossible to see past the blizzard and storm. Ickapoo yearned for friends and company. Many a time he fiddled with his transistor radio, sending out messages and hoping for a response. He sent fire launchers and rockets into space, hoping that some space traveler would find out about his existence. Ickapoo was an alienated alien. In the same way humans wondered whether we were the only species to inhabit the universe, Ickapoo felt estranged and isolated from the rest of the cosmos.  Join Ickapoo on his escapades across galaxies and worlds in search of company.
Ickapoo the lonely Alien, 2046 is created by Chung Chin-Yi , an eGlobal Creative Publishing Signed Author

define non fiction novel

smoking is bad!

To Snake or not to snake

information of character and species of tvshow and movies that I watch

Another World Domination (English)

Suzuki City Private High School

A Girls View

Machina Vult

[BL] Just Across

Author Achievement

Ickapoo the lonely Alien, 2046

People search define non fiction also like: