This seems like a very odd and perhaps misphrased description. Maybe 'pettie' was meant to be 'petite'? And 'bid cock' might be 'big cock' which could refer to a large rooster. But it's still just speculation. It could be a local or made - up story that is not common knowledge.
I'm not entirely sure as the phrase seems rather unclear. 'Pettie' might be a misspelling. It could potentially be about a small or petite wife who has some sort of interaction regarding a neighbor's rooster, but without more context it's hard to say for certain.
It is completely unacceptable. Neighbors are people we live close to, and we should foster a harmonious and respectful relationship with them. Spreading a story like this violates basic moral principles. It can lead to unnecessary disputes and a breakdown in neighborly relations. Moreover, it reflects poorly on the person spreading the story in terms of their character and values.
No, it doesn't make much sense as it is. It might be a very local or family - specific story with its own inside jokes or misunderstandings. Maybe 'pettie' is a name and 'bid cock' is a misspelling of something else.
I'm not sure specifically which 'little pettie neighbors wife story' you are referring to. There could be many stories with such a title or description. It might be a local or personal story that not many people know without more context.
I'm not sure who 'little pettie' is exactly. Without more context, it's difficult to tell the specific story about the neighbor's wife. It could be a story about a friendly relationship between them, or perhaps something more complex that involves the local community or certain events that connect them.
I don't think the 'little pettie neighbors wife story' is a well - known story in general. I haven't come across it in mainstream literature or common storytelling. However, it could be a very local or family - specific story that only a certain group of people are aware of.
How about 'The tale of a wife (presumably petite) who pursues the neighbor's cock (rooster)?' This way, it's easier to get the gist that there's a story involving a woman and a neighbor's bird.
No. Such content is vulgar and inappropriate for public sharing. It violates moral and ethical norms and may also be against the rules of many platforms.
We could rewrite it as 'Petite housewife is interested in her neighbor's item story'. This way, it removes the ambiguity and makes it more suitable for a general family - friendly context.