i will conquer him passive voice

It depends. In moderation, passive voice can add variety and emphasis. But if it dominates the writing, it can make the story less dynamic and harder to follow.

An antonymous question was a question that stated something first and then was followed by an omitted general question. It was usually answered with yes/no. There were some basic rules to follow in the passive voice: 1. Reverse questions should follow the principle of "yes before no, no before yes". For example: The building was built last year, wasn't it? This building was built last year, wasn't it? The work can't be finished in two days, can it? You can't finish this job in two days, can you? 2. If there are negative words or phrases such as "never, seldom, hardly, little, few, no, no one, nobody, nothing, none" in the statement part, the statement part should be regarded as a negative sentence, and the question part should be used in the affirmative form. For example: The book has never been read, has it? (The book has never been read, has it?) 3. If there were words with negative prefixing "un -, dis -, im -"(such as unhappy, dislike, unfriendly, impossible) or words with negative postfix "- less" in the statement, the statement would be treated as an affirmative sentence, and the question would be treated as a negative form. The movie is unwatched, isn't it? (This movie wasn't watched, was it?) 4. The subject of the question part of a rhetorical question must be the nominative form of a personal pronoun (i.e. I/we/you/he/she/it/they) and should be consistent with the subject of the statement. When the subject of the statement is the demonicative pronoun "this/that", the subject of the question should be "it"; when the subject of the statement is "these/those", the subject of the question should be "they". For example: This bridge was built last year, isn't it? The bridge was built last year, wasn't it? Those trees were planted by him, weren't they? (He planted those trees, didn't he?) 5. The same principle applies to antonymic questions in the passive voice with a modai verb. For example: The work should be done by you, shouldn't it? (You should be doing this job, shouldn't you?) <a href="/?from=ask_words" style="color:red" target="_blank">Read more exciting novels for free</a>

Not necessarily. Passive voice can be useful in certain situations, like emphasizing the recipient of an action or creating a specific tone.

Using passive voice in fiction isn't always a bad thing. It can be useful for emphasizing certain elements or creating a specific tone. But overusing it might make the writing seem less dynamic.

Yes, it can be okay. Sometimes, using the passive voice adds emphasis or creates a certain tone that works for the story.

In general, fiction leans more towards the active voice. It helps to create a sense of immediacy and makes the action and characters more vivid. However, passive voice can be used sparingly for certain effects or to vary the writing style.

Just focus on using active verbs instead. Make the subject do the action. For example, say 'She wrote the letter' instead of 'The letter was written by her'.

The main issue with passive voice in fiction is that it can make the action less clear and direct. It adds more words and complexity without adding much value. Also, it can distance the reader from the characters and events.

Passive voice in fiction can affect the pacing. Since it often makes the sentence a bit more complex, it can slow down the reading speed, which might be useful when the author wants to build tension. Also, it can be used to avoid naming the doer when the author wants to keep the reader guessing. For instance, 'The message was delivered, but no one knew who did it.' This adds an element of intrigue to the story.

In fiction, passive voice can be used to shift the focus. For example, 'The door was opened by the detective.' Here, the focus is on the door rather than the detective who opened it. It can create a sense of mystery or draw attention to an action's result.