The selection of the best 200 ad stories could be a complex process. It could involve considering multiple factors. Audience engagement is a key factor. Ads that generate a high level of interaction, such as likes, shares, and comments on social media, are likely to be considered. Another factor could be the brand recall. If an ad is so memorable that consumers can easily remember the brand associated with it, it has a good chance of being selected. Additionally, the long - term impact on the brand's image and reputation also plays a role. An ad that positively influences how the brand is perceived over time is more likely to be part of the best 200.
One of the best ad stories could be the Apple '1984' ad. It was revolutionary. It presented Apple as a rebel against the conformist computer world, which was dominated by IBM at that time. The ad was more like a short film and it grabbed people's attention instantly, making Apple a very cool and innovative brand in people's minds.
One of the best ad stories is Apple's '1984' Macintosh ad. It was revolutionary. It presented Apple as a rebel against the established computer norms, like IBM. The ad was shown during the Super Bowl and its dystopian, thought - provoking imagery captured the public's imagination. It not only promoted the Macintosh but also established Apple as an innovative and forward - thinking brand.
We can learn simplicity. Many best ad stories are simple in their messaging. For example, Volkswagen's 'Think Small' ad. It just focused on the small size of the Beetle as an advantage, which was different from other car ads at that time. We can also learn about emotional connection. Ads like Budweiser's Clydesdale commercials create an emotional bond with the audience. They tell a story that tugs at the heartstrings.
News stories are usually selected based on their relevance, timeliness, and significance. Stories that have a major impact on people's lives or are of broad public interest tend to be chosen.
They could be selected based on their significance. Maybe the stories that have a wide - reaching impact on society or a particular community are chosen.
There are likely multiple factors at play. Literary critics may have considered the innovation in writing style, the depth of the themes explored, and how well the novels have stood the test of time. For example, novels that were able to capture the essence of a particular era in American history in a very profound way were probably more likely to be included. Also, those that had a major impact on subsequent generations of writers would also be strong contenders.
The Hugo Award best novels are selected through a voting process. Members of the World Science Fiction Society get to vote. They nominate and then vote on the works they think are the best in the given year. It involves a wide range of science fiction and fantasy fans from around the world who are part of the society.
The Academy has a voting process for selecting the Oscar best story nominees. Members of the relevant branch, like the Writers Branch, get to vote. They consider various factors such as the originality of the story, its emotional impact, and how well it is crafted. Usually, a lot of high - profile and critically acclaimed movies are in the running.
The selection of Hugo Award Best Novels starts with the nomination phase. People who are members of relevant organizations or have purchased supporting memberships can nominate novels. After that, all the nominated novels are put on the ballot. The voters, who are mainly members of the WSFS, then vote for their favorite. The criteria for a good candidate can be complex. It includes things like the strength of the plot, the development of characters, the creativity of the world - building (if it's a science - fiction or fantasy novel), and how well the novel has been received by the reading public. In addition, the award aims to recognize works that contribute to the diversity and evolution of the genre.
The selection of novels for 'the 100 best novels' might have been a complex process. Critics' reviews and evaluations probably played a big role. Also, the long - term impact of the novels on the development of literary styles and themes. Maybe the number of times they have been studied in academic settings was also considered. However, it's hard to say for sure without more information about the specific selection criteria.