One way is to play with the facts. You can change the time period or the setting slightly to make the story more interesting. For instance, if you're writing a love story set in the present day, you could move it to a more romantic era like the 1920s. This gives you more scope for creating a good story without being too bound by the modern - day truth. Also, you can add fictional elements like a magical object that helps the characters. As long as it serves the story well, it doesn't matter if it's not true in real life.
One way is to be liberal with facts. For example, if you're writing a historical fiction, you can change some minor historical details to fit your plot better. Just make sure not to distort the overall essence of the era.
One way is to focus more on the emotions and themes of the story rather than strict facts. For example, if you're writing a love story set in a fictional world, you don't need to worry about the exact geographical or scientific facts of that world.
In writing fiction, you can use the concept by being creative with the plot. Ignore some real - life limitations. Suppose you're writing a story about a character who can fly. Don't let the fact that humans can't fly in real life stop you. Build a world around this ability and make it believable within the context of your story. You can also exaggerate certain elements for dramatic effect without being hindered by the truth.
This statement implies that a good story can be more important than the factual truth. People like to be entertained, and a well - crafted story can do that better than just stating the facts. Take folk tales for instance. They are passed down through generations not because they are strictly true, but because they make for great stories that teach lessons, inspire, or just amuse. The truth might be too dull or complex to have the same impact.
In modern writing, you can use it by not being overly pedantic about facts. For example, in a science - fiction story, you can create your own rules and not worry if they don't match real - world science exactly.
It means that sometimes people prefer to stick to an interesting or fictional narrative rather than let the boring or inconvenient truth disrupt it. For example, in fictional stories, authors might take some liberties with historical facts to make the story more engaging.
It means that sometimes, for the sake of a great narrative, we shouldn't let the cold, hard facts get in the way. For example, in fictional stories, we often suspend our disbelief and accept the made - up world. If we were to constantly apply real - world logic and facts, it could destroy the magic of the story.
First, find a great idea for your hook. It could be something from your own experience or an interesting concept. Then, create characters with depth. Give them names, backstories, and quirks.
In general, it's not a good principle for all types of writing. While in fictional storytelling, it can add an element of fun and creativity, in other areas it's unacceptable. Consider historical fiction. You can take some liberties with minor details to make the story flow better, but you can't completely distort historical facts. In contrast, in a research report, the facts are the foundation, and any deviation from them would render the work invalid. So, it's a principle that should be used very selectively.
The quote implies that the pursuit of pure truth might make a story less appealing. A storyteller can use imagination and embellishments to create a narrative that entertains or has a greater impact, rather than being limited by strict factual accuracy.