Modern writing has a wide range of genres. In creative non - fiction, for instance, you can still be creative while staying somewhat true to facts. But when it comes to pure fiction, Mark Twain's idea is very relevant. Writers can build entire fictional worlds without being restricted by real - world facts. They can create unique cultures, species, and events. For example, in fantasy writing, you can have magic systems that defy the laws of physics. This allows for more imaginative and engaging stories, just as Mark Twain might have intended with his statement.
In modern writing, you can use it by not being overly pedantic about facts. For example, in a science - fiction story, you can create your own rules and not worry if they don't match real - world science exactly.
One way is to focus more on the emotions and themes of the story rather than strict facts. For example, if you're writing a love story set in a fictional world, you don't need to worry about the exact geographical or scientific facts of that world.
He meant that sometimes in storytelling, strict adherence to facts can limit creativity. A good story might be more engaging if it bends or ignores some facts for the sake of entertainment or making a point.
In writing fiction, you can use the concept by being creative with the plot. Ignore some real - life limitations. Suppose you're writing a story about a character who can fly. Don't let the fact that humans can't fly in real life stop you. Build a world around this ability and make it believable within the context of your story. You can also exaggerate certain elements for dramatic effect without being hindered by the truth.
It means that sometimes people prefer a fictional or exaggerated version of a story rather than the version based strictly on facts. They don't want the cold, hard facts to disrupt the interesting or exciting narrative they have in mind.
It basically means that sometimes you should focus on the entertainment or appeal of a story rather than getting too hung up on whether everything is strictly factual.
Hearst could be a reference to the Hearst Corporation, a large media company. They have a long history in media, so perhaps in this context, it's related to their practices or an attitude that was once prevalent within the company.
One way is to play with the facts. You can change the time period or the setting slightly to make the story more interesting. For instance, if you're writing a love story set in the present day, you could move it to a more romantic era like the 1920s. This gives you more scope for creating a good story without being too bound by the modern - day truth. Also, you can add fictional elements like a magical object that helps the characters. As long as it serves the story well, it doesn't matter if it's not true in real life.
It could imply that Hearst (perhaps a media entity or person named Hearst) has an attitude of not allowing facts to disrupt a story that they consider 'good'. Maybe they prioritize the narrative or entertainment value over strict factual accuracy.
It means that sometimes, for the sake of a great narrative, we shouldn't let the cold, hard facts get in the way. For example, in fictional stories, we often suspend our disbelief and accept the made - up world. If we were to constantly apply real - world logic and facts, it could destroy the magic of the story.
This statement suggests that stories can be a form of escapism or entertainment. We might be more interested in the narrative flow, the characters, and the overall mood of a story. If we always insisted on strict factualness, many great stories, such as fairy tales or science - fiction epics, would lose their magic. Facts can be constraining, while a good story allows for creativity and imagination to run wild.