Well, it implies that a good story has its own charm and allure. The truth can be harsh or boring in comparison. Let's say you're telling a heroic adventure story. If you start adding in all the nitty - gritty real - life limitations and facts like how difficult it really is to climb a mountain without proper gear in the real world, it might spoil the exciting adventure in the story. So, we should keep the story intact and not let truth disrupt it.
It means that sometimes, for the sake of a great narrative, we shouldn't let the cold, hard facts get in the way. For example, in fictional stories, we often suspend our disbelief and accept the made - up world. If we were to constantly apply real - world logic and facts, it could destroy the magic of the story.
The quote implies that the pursuit of pure truth might make a story less appealing. A storyteller can use imagination and embellishments to create a narrative that entertains or has a greater impact, rather than being limited by strict factual accuracy.
It means that sometimes people prefer a fictional or exaggerated version of a story rather than the version based strictly on facts. They don't want the cold, hard facts to disrupt the interesting or exciting narrative they have in mind.
It basically means that sometimes you should focus on the entertainment or appeal of a story rather than getting too hung up on whether everything is strictly factual.
It could imply that Hearst (perhaps a media entity or person named Hearst) has an attitude of not allowing facts to disrupt a story that they consider 'good'. Maybe they prioritize the narrative or entertainment value over strict factual accuracy.
This statement implies that a good story can be more important than the factual truth. People like to be entertained, and a well - crafted story can do that better than just stating the facts. Take folk tales for instance. They are passed down through generations not because they are strictly true, but because they make for great stories that teach lessons, inspire, or just amuse. The truth might be too dull or complex to have the same impact.
It means that in creative writing, sometimes strict adherence to facts can limit the imaginative and engaging aspects of a story. For example, a historical fiction writer might tweak some minor historical details to make the plot more exciting or to better fit the character arcs. It's about prioritizing the narrative's entertainment value over absolute truth.
It means don't spoil a great war story. Maybe by adding false details, or over - analyzing it in a way that takes away from its essence.
He meant that sometimes in storytelling, strict adherence to facts can limit creativity. A good story might be more engaging if it bends or ignores some facts for the sake of entertainment or making a point.
In writing fiction, you can use the concept by being creative with the plot. Ignore some real - life limitations. Suppose you're writing a story about a character who can fly. Don't let the fact that humans can't fly in real life stop you. Build a world around this ability and make it believable within the context of your story. You can also exaggerate certain elements for dramatic effect without being hindered by the truth.
This statement suggests that stories can be a form of escapism or entertainment. We might be more interested in the narrative flow, the characters, and the overall mood of a story. If we always insisted on strict factualness, many great stories, such as fairy tales or science - fiction epics, would lose their magic. Facts can be constraining, while a good story allows for creativity and imagination to run wild.