Some might point to the lack of contemporaneous non - religious accounts that detail every aspect of the Jesus story as evidence it could be fiction. However, this is a weak argument as there are some non - Christian historical mentions. But some skeptics may say that the long passage of time between the events and the writing of the Gospels allowed for embellishment and fictionalization.
Seismic evidence. Earthquake waves travel through the Earth in ways that are only possible if the Earth has a solid - like structure. For instance, P - waves and S - waves behave in specific ways when they encounter different layers of the Earth. If the Earth were hollow, these wave patterns would be completely different.
Regarding evidence for Moses, religious texts are a major source. The detailed accounts in the Torah, for instance, are seen as evidence by believers. But from a scientific and archaeological perspective, it's more complex. There are no inscriptions or artifacts that directly name Moses. However, some historians believe that the general story of a group of people leaving Egypt could be based on real events. And if there were such an event, it's likely there was a leader, which could be Moses. So, the evidence is not conclusive either way.
Some historical records mention outlaws in Sherwood Forest around the time the Robin Hood legend is set. These could be the basis for the story.
There are some geographical locations that seem to be associated with Arthur in the legends. For instance, Tintagel in Cornwall is often linked to him. Archaeological excavations there have found evidence of a high - status settlement from the right time period, which might be related to the Arthurian stories. Also, some place - names in Britain seem to have Arthurian origins, which could imply that there was a real person behind the legend who left an impact on the local area.
Some of the place - names in Britain are evidence. For example, Tintagel in Cornwall is often associated with Arthur's birthplace. Archaeological finds in that area might also be related to the Arthurian era.
There is actually no evidence at all that would suggest the Amityville Horror hoax was a true story. The story was a creation of the Lutzes, who wanted to profit from the horror - loving public. They made up details about the supposed haunted house, like the strange apparitions and the evil forces within. But none of these things were real, and investigations have shown that their entire account was a falsehood.
Some people point to the narrative structure. It has a continuous story with characters, plots, and settings similar to a novel. For example, it tells of different groups migrating and their interactions. Also, the lack of archaeological evidence for some of the events described in the Book of Mormon makes some suspect it might be more of a fictional creation like a novel.
Some viewers have noticed that his reactions in certain situations are not as genuine - looking as they should be. For instance, when faced with relationship problems, his responses seem rehearsed rather than coming from a place of real emotion. Also, the way his story progresses is very convenient for the show's narrative, which makes it seem like it was planned out rather than a natural sequence of events.
The way other characters in the story refer to her can be a big clue. If they use female pronouns when talking about her, or if they treat her in a way that is typical for how one would treat a girl in that story's world. For example, if they compliment her on her beauty or if they include her in female - only activities in the story. Another aspect could be her emotional responses, if they are more in line with what is considered feminine in the context of the story, like being more sensitive or empathetic.
The existence of multiple, convoluted theories. Just like in a mystery novel where there are many red herrings, the numerous and often conflicting theories about Seth Rich's murder seem to mimic the plot twists in a mystery story.