The lack of a clear - cut solution so far. Mystery novels often keep the readers guessing until the very end. Similarly, the Seth Rich case has remained unsolved for a long time with no definitive answers, which gives it an air of a mystery novel - like enigma.
Well, the sudden and somewhat mysterious nature of his death can be seen as a similarity. In many mystery novels, the victim is killed in a way that seems unexpected and out of the blue. Also, the various shadowy figures and possible motives that have been speculated about in the case are elements that are often found in mystery novels where there are hidden antagonists and complex motives behind the crime.
The existence of multiple, convoluted theories. Just like in a mystery novel where there are many red herrings, the numerous and often conflicting theories about Seth Rich's murder seem to mimic the plot twists in a mystery story.
Yes, it could be. There are some similarities in terms of the complex plot and the elements of mystery that might resemble those in a mystery novel. For example, the unexpected death, the lack of clear motives at first glance, and the various speculations surrounding it are all elements that can be found in mystery novels.
Some people point to the narrative structure. It has a continuous story with characters, plots, and settings similar to a novel. For example, it tells of different groups migrating and their interactions. Also, the lack of archaeological evidence for some of the events described in the Book of Mormon makes some suspect it might be more of a fictional creation like a novel.
Seismic evidence. Earthquake waves travel through the Earth in ways that are only possible if the Earth has a solid - like structure. For instance, P - waves and S - waves behave in specific ways when they encounter different layers of the Earth. If the Earth were hollow, these wave patterns would be completely different.
Some might point to the lack of contemporaneous non - religious accounts that detail every aspect of the Jesus story as evidence it could be fiction. However, this is a weak argument as there are some non - Christian historical mentions. But some skeptics may say that the long passage of time between the events and the writing of the Gospels allowed for embellishment and fictionalization.
Regarding evidence for Moses, religious texts are a major source. The detailed accounts in the Torah, for instance, are seen as evidence by believers. But from a scientific and archaeological perspective, it's more complex. There are no inscriptions or artifacts that directly name Moses. However, some historians believe that the general story of a group of people leaving Egypt could be based on real events. And if there were such an event, it's likely there was a leader, which could be Moses. So, the evidence is not conclusive either way.
Some historical records mention outlaws in Sherwood Forest around the time the Robin Hood legend is set. These could be the basis for the story.
There are some geographical locations that seem to be associated with Arthur in the legends. For instance, Tintagel in Cornwall is often linked to him. Archaeological excavations there have found evidence of a high - status settlement from the right time period, which might be related to the Arthurian stories. Also, some place - names in Britain seem to have Arthurian origins, which could imply that there was a real person behind the legend who left an impact on the local area.
Some of the place - names in Britain are evidence. For example, Tintagel in Cornwall is often associated with Arthur's birthplace. Archaeological finds in that area might also be related to the Arthurian era.
There is actually no evidence at all that would suggest the Amityville Horror hoax was a true story. The story was a creation of the Lutzes, who wanted to profit from the horror - loving public. They made up details about the supposed haunted house, like the strange apparitions and the evil forces within. But none of these things were real, and investigations have shown that their entire account was a falsehood.
There are several things that suggest his war stories are fake. Lack of documentation from legitimate military or historical archives is a big one. His stories also lack the kind of detail that comes from real - life experiences. Real war stories are filled with specific details about the terrain, the actions of comrades, and the chaos of battle. Robertson's often seem more like generalizations or stories made up to make a point. Additionally, when fact - checkers have looked into some of his claims, they've found no basis in fact, which is a strong indication that his war stories are not genuine.