Why didn't they kill Marvin in Pulp Fiction?
Well, there could be a bunch of reasons. Maybe they had a soft spot for him, or they thought it would cause more trouble than it was worth. Or perhaps it was all part of a bigger plan that wasn't revealed yet.
Why didn't they kill Marvin in Pulp Fiction?
Maybe they had other motives or reasons that weren't obvious. Maybe killing Marvin wasn't part of their ultimate plan.
Why didn't they kill Marvin in Pulp Fiction?
There could be a variety of reasons. Maybe they thought Marvin could be useful later, or they were afraid of the consequences of killing him. Or perhaps it was just a plot twist to keep the story interesting and unpredictable.
Why didn't Jules kill LaVarr Burton in Pulp Fiction?
Maybe Jules had a change of heart or saw something in LaVarr Burton that made him hesitate.
Why didn't Jules kill LaVar Burton in Pulp Fiction?
Well, there could be multiple reasons. Maybe LaVar Burton did something to convince Jules not to. Or perhaps Jules had a moment of reflection and decided against it for personal or ethical reasons. Maybe it was part of a larger plot twist or character development.
Why was Marvin not killed in Pulp Fiction?
It could be that keeping Marvin alive served a greater purpose for the plot's development or to create unexpected twists later on.
Why did they take Marvin in Pulp Fiction?
Maybe they needed him for some specific purpose related to their criminal activities. Could be for leverage or to use him as a hostage.
Who didn't like Pulp Fiction and why?
Some people might not have liked it because of its violence or nonlinear narrative.
Why didn't I like Pulp Fiction?
Maybe it was the style of storytelling that didn't click for you. Some people find it too nonlinear or hard to follow.
Why didn't John Cusack do Pulp Fiction?
Maybe he wasn't offered the role or had scheduling conflicts.
Why didn't Michael Madsen do Pulp Fiction?
Maybe he had scheduling conflicts or wasn't interested in the role.