It's hard to say exactly. Maybe it was part of a larger plan or a spur-of-the-moment decision based on circumstances. Could be that Marvin had crossed them in some way before.
Maybe they needed him for some specific purpose related to their criminal activities. Could be for leverage or to use him as a hostage.
It could be that keeping Marvin alive served a greater purpose for the plot's development or to create unexpected twists later on.
It was a spur-of-the-moment decision driven by the chaotic and unpredictable nature of the situation.
Yes, he died. In that crazy and violent world of 'Pulp Fiction', poor Marvin was just in the wrong place at the wrong time. His death was one of those unexpected and shocking moments in the movie that added to its dark and unpredictable nature. It was a moment that also led to further complications and actions for the other characters, like Vincent and Jules having to deal with his dead body in the car.
Yes, in 'Pulp Fiction', Marvin was shot. It was a rather unexpected and violent moment in the movie.
Yes, Marvin did die in Pulp Fiction. It happened in a rather unexpected and violent scene.
Maybe it violated some platform's content policies or licensing agreements.
Sure did. Marvin met his end in the movie. It was a rather unexpected and violent turn of events.
Well, there could be a bunch of reasons. Maybe they had a soft spot for him, or they thought it would cause more trouble than it was worth. Or perhaps it was all part of a bigger plan that wasn't revealed yet.
Maybe they had other motives or reasons that weren't obvious. Maybe killing Marvin wasn't part of their ultimate plan.
There could be a variety of reasons. Maybe they thought Marvin could be useful later, or they were afraid of the consequences of killing him. Or perhaps it was just a plot twist to keep the story interesting and unpredictable.