Maybe it was a result of panic or a miscalculation in the heat of the moment. The characters' actions in Pulp Fiction often lack clear rationales.
It was a spur-of-the-moment decision driven by the chaotic and unpredictable nature of the situation.
It could have been a combination of factors like stress, fear, or simply a wrong move made in a tense and volatile environment.
Yes, in 'Pulp Fiction', Marvin was shot. It was a rather unexpected and violent moment in the movie.
Jules shot Marvin during a chaotic and unexpected moment. It happened when tensions were high and things took a violent turn.
Jules shoots Marvin by accident. It happens in a tense and chaotic situation, and it's a sudden turn of events.
Maybe they needed him for some specific purpose related to their criminal activities. Could be for leverage or to use him as a hostage.
It could be that keeping Marvin alive served a greater purpose for the plot's development or to create unexpected twists later on.
Yes, he died. In that crazy and violent world of 'Pulp Fiction', poor Marvin was just in the wrong place at the wrong time. His death was one of those unexpected and shocking moments in the movie that added to its dark and unpredictable nature. It was a moment that also led to further complications and actions for the other characters, like Vincent and Jules having to deal with his dead body in the car.
Yes, Marvin did die in Pulp Fiction. It happened in a rather unexpected and violent scene.
Sure did. Marvin met his end in the movie. It was a rather unexpected and violent turn of events.
Well, there could be a bunch of reasons. Maybe they had a soft spot for him, or they thought it would cause more trouble than it was worth. Or perhaps it was all part of a bigger plan that wasn't revealed yet.
Maybe they had other motives or reasons that weren't obvious. Maybe killing Marvin wasn't part of their ultimate plan.