webnovel

Who has a higher status, the legitimate son or the eldest son

2024-12-21 04:32
1 answer
2024-12-21 08:33

The status of a Di son was higher than that of a Shu eldest son. Di son was the son of the main wife, and Shu eldest son was the eldest son of the side room or other concubines. Di sons had the priority to inherit the family property, and the eldest son had the highest status. Only when there was no legitimate son in the family would they consider letting the eldest son inherit the family business. Di children had a higher status in the patriarch system. They usually inherited the family business and connections, and their parents would pave the way for their future. Therefore, according to the information provided, the status of a legitimate son was higher than that of an illegitimate eldest son.

Which is higher, the eldest son or the legitimate son?

1 answer
2024-12-24 09:13

The status of a legitimate son was higher than that of the eldest son. A legitimate son was a son born to his wife, while the eldest son was the eldest son in the family, regardless of who his biological mother was. In ancient China, the Di Shu system was strict, and the Di son had priority in inheritance, even if he was not the eldest son. The status of a legitimate son was higher because he had the priority to inherit the family property. The eldest son was the first son born to his wife. He had the highest status among all the children. The eldest son of a concubine was the eldest son of a concubine or a concubine, and his status was relatively low. Generally speaking, Di sons had a higher status than Shu sons, and the eldest son had the highest status.

Which is higher, the eldest son of a concubine or the second son of a legitimate wife?

1 answer
2024-12-21 22:15

The second son had a higher status. The second son was the second son born to the main wife, while the eldest son was the eldest son born to the side room or other concubines. Generally speaking, Di sons had a higher status than Shu sons, and the eldest son had the highest status. Di sons had the priority to inherit the family property. Unless there was no Di son in the family, only the eldest son would be considered to inherit the family property. According to the patriarch system, the eldest son was more likely to inherit the family business and connections. The status of the second son was still higher than that of the eldest son, and the presence of the illegitimate son in the family was relatively weak. Therefore, according to the information provided, the second son had a higher status.

Who will inherit the throne, the legitimate son or the eldest son?

1 answer
2024-12-17 20:46

In ancient China, the succession to the throne usually followed the system of the eldest son inheriting the throne. Di son referred to the son born by his wife, while the eldest son referred to the oldest son. There were many reasons behind the system of eldest son succession, including maintaining the stability of the imperial power and avoiding internal disputes, ensuring the smooth and orderly succession of the throne, and meeting the requirements of Confucian ethics. However, in reality, the system of succession of the eldest son might be affected by the emperor's personal preferences, the interference of the powerful and influential forces, and other factors. Therefore, if the eldest son died, the heir to the throne might be the eldest grandson or other suitable heir.

The difference between a legitimate son and an eldest son

1 answer
2024-12-24 09:10

The difference between a legitimate son and an eldest son was their status and inheritance rights. The eldest son was the first son among all the sons born to the male master and his wife, while the legitimate son was all the sons born to the male master and his wife. The eldest son was the first son of the male master and his wife. The eldest son had the first right of inheritance among all the sons, followed by a bunch of legitimate sons, and finally, it was the turn of the illegitimate sons. The right of inheritance of the eldest son was unchangeable. Even if the male master remarried or had another child, the eldest son would still maintain the first right of inheritance. The status and inheritance rights of the eldest son and legitimate son were determined according to the specific situation.

The meaning and status of the eldest son

1 answer
2024-12-19 23:01

The eldest son had a special meaning and status in Chinese culture. In ancient China's feudal society, the birth and growth of the eldest son was regarded as an important event and well-being of a family. The eldest son had a special responsibility and role in the family and society. He was required to respect the old and love the young, be filial to his parents, be responsible, and so on. He was regarded as an excellent quality and virtue. The eldest son was also the representative and role model of family and social ethics. In addition, the eldest son also needed to maintain the family's honor and tradition, inherit the family's culture and values, and maintain the stability and continuation of the family. In the family, the eldest son had a special status and responsibility. He had to bear the responsibility of inheriting the family's status and power, and play a leading role to lead the family to develop and grow. The eldest son was the father's right-hand man and the pillar of the family. In short, the eldest son carried the hopes and expectations of the family in Chinese culture and had an important meaning and status.

What do you mean by legitimate son and eldest son?

1 answer
2024-12-19 09:22

Di son referred to all the sons born to the main wife, and the first son born to the main wife was called the eldest son. The eldest son was the eldest son in the family. In ancient China, due to the existence of polygamy, the eldest son could also be divided into the eldest son and the eldest son. The eldest son was the first son born to the wife, while the eldest son was the first son born to the concubine. Therefore, the meaning of Di son and eldest son was different. Di son referred to all the sons born by his wife, while eldest son referred to the eldest son in the family.

What's the difference between a legitimate son and an eldest son?

1 answer
2024-12-17 10:24

The difference between a legitimate son and an eldest son was their definition and status. The eldest son was the first son among all the sons born to the male master and his wife, while the legitimate son was all the sons born to the male master and his wife. The eldest son was the first son of the male master and his wife. The eldest son had the first right of inheritance among all the sons, followed by a bunch of legitimate sons, and finally, it was the turn of the illegitimate sons. The right of inheritance of the eldest son was unchangeable. Even if the male master remarried or had another child, the eldest son would still maintain the first right of inheritance. The status and inheritance rights of the eldest son and legitimate son were determined according to the specific situation.

What's the difference between a legitimate son and an eldest son?

1 answer
2024-12-16 19:44

The difference between a legitimate son and an eldest son was their status and identity. The eldest son was the first son born to the male master and his wife, regardless of the mother's status. Di children were all the sons of the male master and the main wife. They were the sons of the main wife. The status of a legitimate son was higher than that of the eldest son. The eldest son was the first son of the male master and his wife. He was both the eldest son and the eldest son. He was the eldest among the legitimate sons. The eldest son had the highest status among the sons. Therefore, the main difference between a legitimate son and an eldest son was their birth status and status in the family.

Is the Eldest Princess 'status higher or the Imperial Noble Consort's status higher?

1 answer
2025-01-06 17:23

Both the Eldest Princess and the Imperial Noble Consort had high statuses, but there was no clear information on which one was higher. According to document 1 and document 4, the eldest princess was the emperor's sister and belonged to the royal family. The imperial noble consort was the vice empress and had a high status. Thus, it could be said that the Eldest Princess and the Imperial Noble Consort had equal status.

Is the son of a bastard a legitimate son?

1 answer
2024-12-18 15:42

A son born from a concubine was not a legitimate son. A concubine's son referred to a son born to a concubine, while a legitimate son referred to a son born to a legitimate wife. The status of a concubine's son was lower than that of a legitimate son. Generally, he could not accept the sacrifices of the ancestral temple and inherit the status of his father and grandfather. Therefore, the son of a concubine did not have the status of a legitimate son.

a
b
c
d
e
f
g
h
i
j
k
l
m
n
o
p
q
r
s
t
u
v
w
x
y
z