The Shanghai version is considered one of the best. It provided detailed information, comprehensive illustrations, and exquisite binding. It was known as the most complete version. In addition, the modern edition and the Beiyue 21 edition were also recommended to readers who paid more attention to the quality of the translation than the binding. Chen Lai Yuan Huaming's translation was excellent, but there were many changes to the original plot. The Beijing United Press's translation was faithful to the original work, but the translation was not outstanding. In general, the Shanghai version was a popular version. It was loyal to the original work and provided detailed information and exquisite binding. Therefore, it could be considered one of the best versions.
There were several versions of the Great Tang Di Gong Case that were highly recommended. The Shanghai version was considered the most complete version. In terms of content, Chen Hu's version was relatively complete, while the other versions had some changes. The Shanghai version was full of detailed information, comprehensive illustrations, and exquisite binding. It was currently the best-selling version. Other than that, the modern version and the Beiyue 21 version were also good choices. The translation by Beijing United Press was loyal to the original work, but the translation was average and did not include the author's foreword and postscript. According to personal preferences and needs, you can choose the version that suits you.
The Shanghai translation of The Great Tang Di Gong An was considered one of the best versions. This version was considered to be the most complete. The content was relatively complete, and the other versions had certain changes. The Shanghai version was full of detailed information, comprehensive illustrations, and exquisite binding. It was currently the best-selling version. In addition, this version also included the author's foreword and afterword, maps, and illustrations. It was considered a version that was loyal to the original. Therefore, if you are looking for a good book, the Shanghai translation is a recommended choice.
The Shanghai version was considered one of the best versions of the book. This edition provided detailed information, comprehensive illustrations, and exquisite binding. It was currently the best-selling edition. In addition, new versions of modern publishing houses were also recommended to readers who wanted a new experience. Other versions, such as Chen Laiyuan's and Hu Ming's versions, the Beijing Joint Publishing Company's versions, and Zhang Ling's versions, also had their own characteristics. However, which translation was better depended on one's personal preferences and needs.
It could be seen that there were many versions of the translation of the Great Tang Di Gong An. Among them, some people had a high evaluation of the version translated by Ms. Zhang Ling of Shanghai Translation Press. They thought that the style of writing was simple and faithful to the original work, and the content was not deleted. In addition, the modern publishing house had also launched a new set of translated versions. Dong Chuyang was responsible for the translation and the manuscript. It adopted a translation style similar to the vernacular of the Ming and Qing Dynasties, with detailed annotations. However, since more information about the other versions was not provided, it was impossible to make a comparison between the other versions. Therefore, I cannot give a definite answer as to which version is better.
The Shanghai translation of "Da Tang Di Gong An" was a popular version. It was regarded as a translation that was loyal to the original work, and the binding was comfortable and had an ancient feeling. This version was translated by Ms. Zhang Ling and was called the complete translation. It included Mr. Gao's foreword, postscript, and the translator's postscript, as well as the notes and illustrations of the original version. In addition, this version also had special promotions during the shopping festival. In other versions, the full-annotation version of the Hainan Press was also mentioned, but there were some cuts. As for the other versions, the search results did not provide any relevant information. Therefore, the Shanghai version of Di Gong 'an of Tang Dynasty could be considered a good choice.
The Shanghai translation was considered one of the best versions of the case. It was known as the most complete version. In terms of content, Chen Hu's version was relatively complete, while the other versions had some changes. The Shanghai version was full of detailed information, comprehensive illustrations, and exquisite binding. It was currently the best-selling version. Other than that, the modern version and the Beiyue 21 version were also good choices. There was limited information on the other versions, so it was impossible to give a specific evaluation.
The best translated versions of Da Tang Di Gong An were the Shanghai version and the new version by the modern publishing house. The Shanghai translation was considered one of the best because it provided detailed information, comprehensive illustrations, exquisite binding, and was currently the best-selling version. In addition, the Shanghai translation version attached great importance to the quality of the translation. The new translation of the modern publishing house summarized the original 14 medium-length novels, 2 medium-length novels, and 8 short detective stories into 6 volumes, with a total of 24 strange cases. The famous translator Dong Chuyang presided over the translation, and the translation was not deleted, but the annotations were detailed. These two versions received a certain amount of recommendation and praise. Other versions, such as Chen Lai's Yuan Huaming's version and the Gaulopez's version, were also good choices. However, Chen Lai's Yuan Huaming's version changed the original too much and was not recommended. Therefore, according to the information provided, the Shanghai translation and the new translation by the modern publishing house could be considered as one of the best versions of the case.
The best translation of the case of Duke Di of Tang Dynasty was the Shanghai version and the new translation by the modern publishing house. The Shanghai translation was considered one of the best because it provided detailed information, comprehensive illustrations, exquisite binding, and was currently the best-selling version. The modern publishing house's version was translated by Dong Chuyang. It adopted a translation style similar to the vernacular of the Ming and Qing Dynasties, which was more in line with the Chinese oral expression. The quality and reviews of the other versions were not mentioned.
There were several versions of Da Tang Di Gong An that were considered to have good translation quality. The Shanghai translation was considered a popular and faithful version of the original, with detailed information, comprehensive illustrations, and exquisite binding. This version was translated by Ms. Zhang Ling and was called the complete translation. It included Mr. Gao's foreword, postscript, and the translator's postscript, as well as the notes and illustrations of the original version. The modern edition and the Beiyue 21 edition were also recommended to readers who paid more attention to the quality of the translation than the binding and illustration. Chen Lai Yuan Huming's translation was excellent, but there were too many changes to the original. Dong Chuyang's translation was described as fluent and easy to read. It retained the language style of the original work while taking into account the Chinese expression habits. In summary, according to the information provided, the Shanghai version, the modern version, the Beiyue 21 version, and the Dong Chuyang version were considered to be of better translation quality.
The modern publishing house's " Da Tang Di Gong An " translated by Dong Chuyang was the latest version. Dong Chuyang was in charge of the translation and the manuscript. This version adopted a translation style similar to the vernacular of the Ming and Qing Dynasties, which was more in line with the reading habits of Chinese readers.