Urgent ~ Debate Competition: Should a classic film and television drama be made into a sequel?
2024-09-20 07:10
Seeking opinions, additional points if satisfied…
1 answer
2024-09-20 11:02
Whether or not a classic film or television series should be filmed was a more complicated question. For details, one could refer to the following points: 1. Sequels to classic movies and TV shows may exist because people are still interested in the previous work or some plot or theme of the previous work needs further exploration or development. In addition, sequels could also provide the audience with a sense of freshness and surprise, allowing them to continue to enjoy the story and performance of the work. Two sequels might also have a negative impact on the original works of classic movies and television dramas. If the quality of the sequels was not as good as the previous one, the audience might lose interest in the sequels and have a negative impact on the original. In addition, if the sequel completely plagiarized or plagiarized the content of the original work, it might also damage the reputation and influence of the original work. Therefore, making a sequel to a classic film and television drama was a possible choice, but it needed to be carefully considered to avoid negatively affecting the original work. Most importantly, sequels should be based on sufficient research and consideration to ensure that they faithfully present the theme and plot of the original work.
Urgent ~ Debate Competition: Should a classic film and television drama be made into a sequel?
1 answer
2024-09-20 07:12
Whether or not a classic film or television series should be made into a sequel was a topic worth discussing. Here are some ideas that might help answer this question:
Supporting the view of making a sequel:
The sequels of classic movies and TV series could once again attract the audience to bring new experiences and surprises.
2. The sequels of classic movies and TV series could maintain the style and theme of the original works and carry out innovation and development on this basis.
Three sequels could bring more commercial benefits because they could attract more audiences and investments.
Opposition to the sequels:
The sequels of classic movies and TV series may destroy the image and meaning of the original work and repeat and extend it.
2. The classic works have already been deeply rooted in the hearts of the people. Making sequels may disappoint and tire the audience.
The three-shot sequels might distract the fans and audience of the original work and lead to a decline in the evaluation of the original work.
To sum up, there is no absolute answer to this question because whether or not to make a sequel depends on the decision of the audience and the film producers. If the audience was interested in the sequels of classic movies and television dramas and were willing to support the film producers, as well as the confidence and resources to create new and valuable content, then the sequels might be successful. However, if the audience was unwilling or unable to accept the sequels, the film producers could not guarantee their success. Therefore, it was important to find a balance so that the sequels could not only satisfy the needs of the audience, but also bring commercial and reputational benefits to the film producers.
Debate Competition: "A good movie should be made into a sequel"
1 answer
2024-09-20 07:50
It was a very controversial topic in the production of movies whether or not sequels should be made. Some people think that a good movie should be made into a sequel because it allows the audience to enjoy the complete story of the movie and explore the plot more deeply. In addition, making sequels could also bring more business opportunities and profits to the film production company.
However, there were also some people who believed that making sequels would not necessarily lead to good film production because sequels might repeat the mistakes and shortcomings of the previous films or lack the unique charm of the previous films. In addition, too many sequels could lead to fierce competition in the film market and reduce the quality and appeal of the film.
Whether or not a movie should be made depended on the personal preferences and needs of each film production company and audience. If a good film could attract the interest of the audience and bring commercial success, then making a sequel might be a good choice. However, if the sequels couldn't surpass the quality and charm of the previous one, then too many sequels might reduce the overall quality of the movie.
Should the successful work of the debate competition be made into a sequel?
1 answer
2024-09-17 01:16
Whether or not they should make a sequel depended on the work itself and the audience's preferences and needs.
Some works were generally considered successful because of their attractive storyline, successful character creation, or unique artistic charm. Therefore, sequels might be made. For example, the Harry Potter series, the Lord of the Rings series, and the Twilight series.
Some works might not be considered sequels because the storyline was dull, the characters were not well portrayed, or the artistic quality was not high enough. For example,'Dream of the Red Chamber',' Water Margins 'and' Journey to the West'.
Whether or not they should make a sequel should be decided based on the situation of the work itself and the audience's reaction. If the audience liked the work very much and the sequels could better meet their needs, they might make sequels. However, if the audience's response was not good or the sequels could not achieve the expected effect, then the sequels might not be made.
Should the successful work of the debate competition be made into a sequel?
1 answer
2024-09-17 01:15
Whether or not they should make a sequel depended on the nature of the work itself and the audience's reaction.
For some works such as movies, TV series, novels, etc., the audience might hope for a sequel to continue the story because they already had a good beginning and had high expectations for the subsequent plot. Under such circumstances, it might be a good choice to make a sequel to bring more surprises and satisfaction to the audience.
However, there were also some works such as movies, TV series, novels, etc. The audience might not be willing to see the follow-up storyline because the storyline was already complete enough or inevitable changes had already taken place. Under such circumstances, making a sequel would waste resources, destroy the integrity of the story, and could lead to a loss of audience.
Whether or not they should make a sequel should be decided based on the situation of the work itself and the audience's reaction. If the audience is full of expectations for the follow-up plot, then making a sequel may be a good choice. If the audience is not willing to see the follow-up plot, then making a sequel may waste resources, destroy the integrity of the story, and may lead to loss of audience.
Should a classic (a successful work) be made into a sequel? affirmative debate
1 answer
2024-09-17 01:18
The issue of making a sequel to a classic (a successful work) was a topic worth discussing. I think it's acceptable to make a sequel to a classic because it can give the audience a better experience.
Sequels to classic works could give the audience a chance to see the ending of the story and enjoy the complete storyline. If a film only had one ending, the audience might be disappointed because they couldn't know the future of the story. However, if there was a sequel to this work, the audience could continue to appreciate the story and enjoy the subsequent development.
Sequels to classic works could also attract more audiences because sequels could bring new elements and plots to make the story more colorful. Some sequels to classic works were even more successful in attracting more viewers than the first.
Sequels to classic works could also maintain their status as classics. If a work only had one ending, it might be forgotten as time passed. However, if there was a sequel to this work, it could maintain its iconic status and continue to attract the interest of the audience.
To sum up, I think it's acceptable for a classic (successful work) to make a sequel. Not only could it bring a better experience to the audience, but it could also attract more viewers and maintain the iconic status of the work.
The theme of the debate competition was " A successful work should be filmed as a sequel."
1 answer
2024-09-17 01:22
A successful work should be made into a sequela. The positive side can debate from the following aspects:
1. Sequels can increase the satisfaction and audience of a work: In a successful work, the audience can often get enough emotions and story clues from the first episode, hoping that the sequels will continue to push the story forward. By making sequels, the audience could better understand and experience the work, increasing their satisfaction and audience.
Sequels could expand the influence and popularity of a work. The first part of a successful work could often attract enough audiences and establish a certain reputation and influence. Sequels could further expand the influence and popularity of the work, attract more audiences and media attention, and make the work more popular as a classic.
3. Sequels could create more business opportunities and profits: The first film of a successful work could often create enough business opportunities and profits to provide the foundation for subsequent filming. Making sequels could create more business opportunities and profits, expand the industry chain of the work, and make the work more successful.
Sequels can improve the cohesiveness and integrity of the work: the first part of a successful work often has laid the foundation for the subsequent plot and development. Sequels can better maintain the cohesiveness and integrity of the work, allowing the audience to better understand and experience the story.
To sum up, sequels played an important role in the follow-up development of a successful work. It could increase the satisfaction and audience of the work, expand the influence and popularity of the work, create more business opportunities and profits, and maintain the continuity and integrity of the work. Therefore, we should actively support the production of sequels to provide more possibilities for the successful development of the work.
Should the successful work of the 1999 International College Debate Competition be filmed as a sequel?
1 answer
2024-09-17 01:12
It shouldn't be.
Although the 1999 International College Debate Competition's finale might be popular with readers, it might not necessarily be a suitable work for a sequel. First of all, each work had its own unique characteristics and style. If a sequel was made, it might repeat or strengthen the characteristics of the previous one instead of creating a new story. Secondly, the classic works might be outdated or criticized for damaging the image and value of the previous works. Therefore, even though " 1999 International College Debate Final Success " might be a successful work, it might not be a good choice to make a sequel.
Film and television novels! Urgent!
1 answer
2024-09-08 04:44
I'm not a fan of online literature. I'm a fan of novels. I can answer questions about all kinds of topics, including movies, TV series, novels, literature, etc. If you have any questions about film and television, please let me know. I'll try my best to answer them.
How much money can a novel be made into a film and television drama?
1 answer
2024-08-24 19:33
The amount of money an author could get from a novel being made into a film or television series depended on many factors, such as the popularity of the novel, the degree of film adaptation, the cooperation between the author and the film adaptation company, and so on.
Generally speaking, the author of the novel could get two parts of the money from the copyright fee and the adaptation fee. The copyright fee was a one-time fee based on the adaptation rights of the novel, and the adaptation fee was based on the degree of adaptation of the novel and the effect of the film and television. If the adaptation of the novel was more extensive or the effect of the film and television was better, the author could get a higher adaptation fee.
In addition, the author could also cooperate with the film adaptation company to participate in all aspects of the film production, such as scriptwriter, director, photography, actor selection, and so on. If the author had high professional skills and experience in these areas, they could get a higher salary.
Therefore, the amount of money an author could get from a novel that was made into a film or television series varied from person to person. Many factors needed to be considered.
What is the difference between drama, film, and television theory and drama, film, and television literature? Can a post-graduate in drama, film, and television theory become a director?
1 answer
2024-09-26 11:02
The theory of drama and film and the literature of drama and film are the branches of the field of film and television art. They both involve the creation, performance, narration and other aspects of film and television art. However, there are some essential differences between them.
The theory of drama and film mainly studies the basic laws, characteristics and forms of expression of drama and film art. It also studies the design, organization, implementation and effect of the plot, characters, lighting, sound, clothing and other aspects of the film and television art. Theoreticians combed and summarized the film and television art from the theoretical level to provide theoretical guidance and practical reference for film and television artists.
On the other hand, drama, film, and television literature focused more on the adaptation of literary works into film and television. It transformed the story, character image, and theme of literary works into film and television texts and guided the creation of film and television. Theoreticians mainly evaluated and analyzed the film and television works from the literary level to explore the narrative structure, language style, character image, theme and other characteristics of the works.
Therefore, the research direction of the graduate students of drama and film theory was mainly to provide theoretical guidance and practical reference for film and television artists by studying the basic laws, characteristics, and forms of expression of film and television art. However, if a post-graduate student could master the basic theories and techniques of film and television arts and also have a high literary quality, they still had great potential to become an excellent director. In terms of directing and directing, the graduate students could provide them with a deeper understanding and guidance to help them better create and express film and television works of art.
Popular Answers
Popular Searches
a
b
c
d
e
f
g
h
i
j
k
l
m
n
o
p
q
r
s
t
u
v
w
x
y
z