Debate topic: Should juvenile delinquents be severely punished? I'm against it. Please provide some examples and materials for the questions raised by the positive side.
As the opposing party, you can consider asking the following questions: Will severe punishment for juvenile delinquents help to improve criminal behavior? Would they be able to effectively punish crime and prevent young people from committing crimes again? Are teenagers more likely to be punished than adults? Would teenagers be more motivated to commit crimes if they were lightly punished? If teenagers were severely punished, would they feel more pressure to give up on committing crimes? Will severe punishment for juvenile delinquency lead to more criminal behavior? Would it aggravate social instability? Here are some possible examples: Research shows that teenagers may be more susceptible to violent crime than adults. Therefore, the punishment for juvenile delinquents should be more severe. For example, in 2010, the city of Los Angeles launched a heavy punishment plan for juvenile delinquents in order to reduce the rate of juvenile delinquency. The plan stipulated that the maximum fine for teenagers who committed serious crimes could be raised to 500,000 dollars. However, the implementation of this plan did not achieve the expected effect. Instead, the juvenile crime rate increased. Some juvenile delinquents commit crimes due to mental illness and other reasons. Should these crimes be severely punished? For example, in 2018, a 17-year-old teenager in New York City was sentenced to 10 years in prison for committing theft due to mental illness. Although the teenager is mentally ill, I think he should be severely punished for his criminal behavior to help him realize his mistakes and change his criminal behavior. Punishing juvenile delinquents severely may make some people feel threatened. For example, some parents might worry that if they were to be severely punished for juvenile delinquency, they might feel more insecure and thus protect their children. Therefore, the interests of the family and friends of juvenile offenders should be taken into account when making plans for heavy punishment and appropriate measures should be taken to protect them.
I'm going to participate in the debate tomorrow. I'm the opposing side. The topic of the debate is that the information on the Internet is not credible! I need a lot of materials. I hope everyone can help.
The credibility of information on the Internet was a very complicated problem because it involved the reliability of the source of the information, the accuracy of the information, the authenticity of the information, and many other aspects. Here is some information that might be useful to you: The reliability of information sources: There are many sources of information on the Internet, including search engines, news websites, social media, forums, and so on. However, the reliability of these sources is not necessarily the same because they may be affected by political, commercial, cultural and other factors. Therefore, when judging whether the information on the Internet was credible, the reliability of the information source needed to be considered. The accuracy of the information: There is a lot of information on the Internet, many of which are unverified or subjective. Therefore, the accuracy of the information on the Internet needed to be considered when judging whether it was credible. News, social media, and other time-sensitive information needed to be closely monitored to avoid being misled. The authenticity of the information: The information on the Internet may also contain false information. This information may have been deliberately fabricated, forged, or based on inaccurate sources. Therefore, the authenticity of the information on the Internet needed to be considered when judging whether it was credible or not. The value of information: Although the information on the Internet may contain false information and inaccurate information, if the content of the information is valuable, it can still have a positive impact on people. Therefore, the value of the information on the Internet needed to be considered when judging whether it was credible or not. This is some information that might be useful to you. Of course, the materials needed for the debate might include how to analyze the reliability and accuracy of online information, how to identify false information, how to evaluate the value of information, and so on. If you need more detailed help, I suggest you consult your debate instructor or coach.
In the debate competition, I am the affirmative and second debate. The debate topic society should value profit over righteousness. How should I ask the other party questions? I want examples.
As the second defender, you can ask the other party the following questions: Please give an example of why society should value profit over righteousness. For example, you can ask the other party,"Why should society value profit over righteousness?" Make the other person understand your argument and provide some concrete examples to support it. For example, you might say," Because the interests of society are money and material wealth, and ethics are concerned with people's inner values." Please explain why it is beneficial to society to value profit over righteousness. You can ask the other party,"Why is it good for society to value profit over righteousness?" Make the other person understand your argument and provide some concrete examples to support it. For example, you might say," Prioritizing profit over justice makes society more efficient and orderly because people are more focused on business interests than ethics." Please explain why ethics should not be replaced. You can ask the other person,"Why shouldn't ethics be replaced?" Make the other person understand your argument and provide some concrete examples to support it. For example, you might say," Morality can help us form the right values, and money and material wealth are only a part of human society. Therefore, ethics are indispensable." 4. Please give an example of how to value profit over righteousness in practice. You can ask the other party,"Why is it so obvious in practice to value profit over righteousness?" Make the other person understand your argument and provide some concrete examples to support it. For example, you might say," A lot of business activities are based on the principle of profit over justice, such as greedy business giants and illegal monopolies." I hope these questions will help you better ask the other person and support your argument.
The topic of the debate was,"Is the improvement of the quality of the youth in Zhengfang raised by the family?" The opposing side was nurtured by the school. Mine is positive, please give me some advice
The positive view is that the improvement of the quality of young people is cultivated by the family. You can refer to the following opinions: Family is an important environment for young people to grow up. In a family environment, young people could learn basic etiquette, morality, and values. The cultivation of these knowledge and skills could not be replaced in school or other environments. Families have a profound influence on the growth of young people. They can not only provide life support and resources, but also provide emotional support and guidance to help young people build self-confidence and self-esteem. 2. Family plays an irreplaceable role in the quality education of young people. Families could provide young people with a wide range of knowledge and skills such as cooking, crafts, music, art, etc. The cultivation of these skills helps young people develop their personal interests and hobbies, enhancing their creativity and imagination. In addition, families could also provide young people with interpersonal and communication skills to help them get along better with others and build good interpersonal relationships. Family has a long-term influence on the growth of young people. The quality of a youth could not be achieved overnight. It required long-term accumulation and cultivation. The family was an important environment for young people to grow up in. It could provide them with continuous support and guidance to help them make progress in their personal growth and career development. Therefore, Zhengfang believes that the improvement of youth quality is nurtured by the family. The family plays an irreplaceable role in the growth of youth. Of course, the opposing side can also put forward their own rebuttal opinions, but the core of the debate is to strive for their own point of view and convince the audience.
We are going to have a debate. The topic of the debate is our own decision. I am the positive side. I need to ask a few questions to question the negative side. I am urgently asking for thanks.
As a positive, you can consider asking the following questions to question the negative: 1 What is "our youth is our own decision"? In this sentence, who should make this decision? What did this decision mean? If youth needs to make decisions, what should these decisions be like? Does it include immoral or inappropriate decisions? If a person can't make his own decision, then is there any meaning to his youth? Are there enough resources for everyone to make their own decisions? If so, where did these resources come from? If not, then why? Should a person be blamed or punished if he cannot make his own decisions? If so, was this accusation or punishment reasonable? 6. Do those who make their own decisions receive the respect and support they deserve? If so, why? If not, then why? Is there enough education and social training to help people make the right decisions? If so, where was the training conducted? If not, then why? If a person's youth is limited or deprived, does he still have the right to pursue his dreams and goals? If so, why? If not, then why? These questions can help you better understand the opposing side's point of view and arguments in order to better debate.
Debate topic: Should I read literary classics?
Affirmative point of view: You should read famous literary works. A literary masterpiece was a classic that had been tested over time and was widely praised. It contained a wealth of knowledge and ideas that could help people improve their cultural quality, broaden their horizons, and enlighten their minds. Through reading literary masterpieces, we can understand important issues in history, philosophy, sociology, psychology and other fields, gain deep thinking and insight, and enhance our critical thinking and logical thinking ability. Literature masterpieces are also wonderful works that can help us appreciate and enjoy the beauty of art. These works usually contain deep emotions and thoughts that can bring us emotional resonance and enlightenment. At the same time, these works can also express human emotions and thoughts in different ways, allowing us to have a deeper understanding of human culture and humanity. Reading literary classics can not only improve our cultural quality and aesthetic ability, but also make us better understand the world and life. Therefore, we should try our best to read literary classics to gain more enlightenment and gains from them.
I am the negative side. On the path of life, opportunities are more important. This is the positive side. I need to ask some positive questions. What questions should I ask?
As the opposing side, you need to ask the opposing side some questions to show your point of view and weaken their point of view. Here are some possible questions: How is the relationship between opportunity and success determined? Why did some people succeed despite the lack of opportunities? Is there a linear relationship between success and opportunity? If so, could it be assumed that the probability of success was constant given enough opportunities? If so, could human intervention be used to increase the probability of success? What is the definition of success? What is the difference between different people's definition of success? How does this affect the relationship between opportunity and success? Is there a positive relationship between success and personal effort? If so, could it be assumed that the probability of success would decrease in the absence of sufficient effort? If so, could human intervention be used to increase the probability of success? Should we value opportunity more than other factors such as talent or luck in life? If so, could these factors be manually intervened or changed? Can success be measured? If so, could you measure a person's success based on certain indicators? If so, what are these indicators? Can success be guaranteed or predicted? If there is no guarantee or prediction, how can we ensure that people can succeed in the absence of opportunities? These questions could stimulate the positive side to explore the relationship between opportunity and success and present their views and arguments. At the same time, these questions could also lead the opposing side to think deeply and refute the positive side's point of view.
The school organized a debate, and the topic was " Should the school impose restrictions on the Internet?" I was on the opposing side of the debate-the school should not impose restrictions on the Internet. seek reason
Schools should not restrict the Internet because the Internet is a necessity of modern life. It has become an important tool for people to obtain information, learn knowledge, communicate and interact, entertainment and relax. As an educational institution, schools should provide students with an open, free and beneficial learning environment so that they can better develop their potential and creativity. Restrictions on the Internet by schools would negatively affect students 'independent learning and exploration. Restricting the use of the Internet may cause students to lose learning opportunities because they cannot obtain the latest knowledge and information on the Internet. At the same time, the use of the Internet can also lead to some bad behaviors such as Internet addiction, cyberbullying, etc., which will have a negative impact on the physical and mental health of students. The school's restrictions on the Internet could not really achieve the purpose of education. Education was not only carried out in the classroom, but also outside the classroom. The Internet was a huge information bank that could provide students with a large amount of resources and information, including academic articles, works of art, news reports, and so on. Restrictions on Internet use by schools could cause students to lose valuable opportunities for learning outside of class. To sum up, schools should not restrict the internet but should provide students with an open, free and beneficial learning environment so that they can better develop their potential and creativity.
I want to participate in the debate. The topic is whether online communication can replace traditional communication methods. I am the opposing side. I hope you can provide me with writing materials.
Whether online communication could replace traditional communication methods was a complicated question. In the debate, you need to provide sufficient evidence and materials to support your point of view in order to provide convincing opinions to the audience and judges. The following are some materials that might be useful: 1. Research data: You can collect data about online communication and traditional communication methods through a survey or an online survey. These data could show how much progress people have made in online communication and where traditional communication methods are still needed. 2. Case Study: You can analyze some successful online communication cases such as social media, email, and online chat and compare their advantages and disadvantages with traditional communication methods. These case studies can provide insights into how online communication can replace traditional communication methods in certain situations. 3. Expert opinion: You can invite some professionals to give a speech or provide materials to support the view that online communication cannot replace traditional communication. These experts could share their professional experience, knowledge, and opinions, and provide comparisons and analysis of online communication and traditional communication methods. Other related topics: You can mention topics related to online communication and traditional communication methods such as cybersecurity, privacy protection, developments and trends in the digital age, etc. These topics can help the audience better understand your point of view and provide you with more arguments. I hope these materials will help you prepare for the debate. Good luck!
I'm against a debate about honesty and white lies! Please ask for information.
I'm against a debate about honesty and white lies! Please ask for information. The views of both sides in the debate were as follows: Affirmative point of view: honesty is the cornerstone of human society, white lies are distrust of others and immoral behavior should be condemned. Honesty in business, social, and personal life can earn the respect and trust of others and build long-term stable interpersonal relationships. A white lie would damage the reputation and interests of others and lead to unnecessary contradictions and conflicts. Therefore, honesty is the principle we should stick to. Opposite view: Although honesty is important for the maintenance of personal and interpersonal relationships, white lies are necessary in certain situations. For example, in order to protect the interests of others or to avoid conflict, we might make up some lies to solve the problem. But these lies must be white and must be rewarded or explained accordingly. If a lie is malicious or deceptive, it will not only destroy interpersonal relationships but also damage personal credibility and moral values. In a debate, we should weigh the importance of honesty and white lies and make wise decisions based on the facts. We should also respect the views of others and maintain honesty and tolerance in communication. In the end, we should strive to build a society that values integrity, respects others, and works together for mutual benefit.
In the debate, I was the opposing side. The college students participating in volunteer activities focused on training. Ask for a debate topic.
College students participating in volunteer activities focused on training. On the contrary, it could be argued that college students participating in volunteer activities could not directly train their personal abilities, but might waste time and resources. Here are some possible counterarguments: 1. volunteer activities may affect college students 'studies. If college students participated in volunteer activities too frequently, it might take up their time and cause them to be unable to concentrate on their studies. Moreover, volunteer activities usually required a long time to participate in, which would have a certain negative impact on the health of college students. 2. volunteer activities do not provide practical work experience for college students. Although volunteer activities could cultivate college students 'sense of social responsibility and teamwork, these experiences could not be directly converted into professional experience. For most college students, their main goal was to find a job after graduation. Therefore, volunteer activities were not a necessary step in their career planning. 3. volunteer activities can't improve the academic performance of college students. Although volunteer activities can help students build a good sense of community and social responsibility, they can't directly improve students 'academic performance. Many college students participate in volunteer activities to find a better job after graduation rather than to enrich their studies. 4. The voluntary activities can't improve the professional skills of college students. Although volunteer activities can help students develop their leadership and teamwork skills, they cannot directly improve their professional skills. For many college students, they need to learn professional knowledge in school in order to find a better job after graduation. Therefore, volunteer activities were not a necessary step for them to improve their skills.