It was a common topic of debate whether it was better to study in school or in society. Here is some information that might be useful: The advantage of studying in school is that you can get a higher quality education, learn more in-depth knowledge, and improve your professional skills and thinking ability. These skills and knowledge can help students be more competitive in their future careers. The advantage of studying in society is that you can gain more experience and skills, enhance social skills and leadership skills, and broaden your horizons and worldview. These skills and knowledge could help people better adapt to society and deal with complex problems. 3. There are advantages and disadvantages to studying in school and society. Studying in school might limit students 'freedom and time, and they would have to bear higher financial and psychological pressure. Studying in society may bring greater social and professional risks, and you need to bear higher cultural and psychological pressure. Choosing to study in school or society should be based on personal needs and interests, as well as future career and life plans. The most important thing was to find a suitable way of learning and career development.
The reasons why middle school students read classics were as follows: Classics are rich in content and cover many subject areas, which can help middle school students broaden their horizons and increase their knowledge. For example," Dream of the Red Chamber " described the life and characters of the feudal society, while " Journey to the West " described various myths and legends and adventure stories of the Western Paradise. These books had a great effect on the language and aesthetic standards of middle school students. Classics have profound thoughts and cultural meanings, which can help middle school students better understand human history and social development. For example, the emotional descriptions of Jia Baoyu and Lin Daiyu in "Dream of the Red Chamber" and the mythical stories and Buddhist ideas in "Journey to the West" could have a positive impact on the humanities of middle school students. 3. Reading classics can cultivate the reading ability of middle school students and improve their writing skills. Through reading classics, students can better master reading skills and comprehension ability, and at the same time, they can also accumulate rich writing materials and language skills. Therefore, it is suggested that middle school students read classics to help them better understand human civilization and social development, as well as to improve their reading, comprehension and writing skills.
The argument that playthings are ambitious can be based on the following points and materials: 1. The concept of "toys with ambition" means that people should appreciate and pursue the value and meaning of toys instead of just treating them as entertainment tools. This view emphasized the role of toys in developing people's personality, intelligence, and emotions. Some literary works such as Dream of the Red Chamber and Water Margins also emphasized the importance of toys in Chinese traditional culture. In these works, toys were regarded as living objects with unique value and meaning, which could cultivate people's emotions and creativity. In modern society, toys also play an increasingly important role. For example, some toys could stimulate people's creativity and imagination, develop intelligence, and promote social interaction. Some toys could also be used as souvenirs to leave good memories for people. The idea of playing with toys can also be compared with playing with toys. If a person only treated toys as entertainment tools and did not pursue the value and meaning of toys, then it was possible to lose the motivation to move forward and become lazy and passive. On the contrary, if a person could gain value and meaning from toys, stimulate creativity and imagination, then it was possible to achieve greater achievements. The above are some of the views and materials that support the plaything Shang Zhi that can be used in the debate.
Network pros and cons As a modern communication tool, the Internet provided a convenient and fast way for people to communicate. The benefits of the internet included: 1. The Internet allows us to obtain information more easily. Through the network, we can access all kinds of information resources, including news, articles, videos, etc., anytime and anywhere. Moreover, these contents can be shared on various platforms, making the information more diverse and rich. The Internet can also help us learn and educate better. Through the internet, we can access various online courses, learning resources, library materials, etc., so that we can have a deeper understanding of various knowledge fields to improve our learning ability and level. The internet also provides us with more entertainment. Through the internet, we can access all kinds of videos, games, social media, etc. to enrich our entertainment life. However, there were also some negative effects of the Internet. The internet could also lead to the spread of false information. Through the internet, we can access all kinds of information, but this information may come from unreliable sources, which will cause us to receive wrong information and affect our judgment and decision-making. 2. The Internet could also lead to the leakage of personal privacy. Through the internet, we can easily access all kinds of sensitive personal information such as home address, phone number, etc., which may lead to the risk of personal information leakage. The internet could also lead to the spread of violence and hate speech. Through the internet, we can come into contact with all kinds of extreme speech and violence, which may have a negative impact on society. To sum up, the internet is a tool with both positive and negative effects. We need to use and manage the network correctly to maximize its advantages and avoid its negative effects.
An argument by metaphor can be either an argument of fact or an argument of reason, depending on the specific content of the metaphor used. In some cases, figurative arguments are used to prove that an idea or argument is based on facts because there is indeed some similarity between the thing and the idea. This kind of argument is called a fact argument because it proves that the point or argument is based on real facts. For example, if someone says," The sun is red," then the argument is based on fact, because there are many animals that have visual reactions when they see the sun, and these reactions are similar to the characteristics of red. On the other hand, figurative argument can also be used to prove that an idea or argument is reasonable because there is some similarity between the thing and the idea. This kind of argument is called a reasoning argument because it proves that the point or argument is based on correct reasoning and logical reasoning. For example, if someone said," The apple is a fighter among fruits," then this metaphor was reasonable because it proved that the apple had unique characteristics and advantages among fruits. Thus, a figurative argument can be either an argument of fact or an argument of reason. It depends on the specific content of the metaphor used and the nature of the point or argument being proved.
Should high school students plan their careers? Opposite argument! Urgent request. As a career planner, I don't think high school students should plan their careers. Here are my reasons: High school is a critical period for students. They should focus on their studies and prepare for college life in the future. A career plan might distract them from their studies and affect their academic performance. 2. High school students are not adults yet. They lack the necessary social experience and life experience. It is difficult for them to understand and deal with the various challenges and difficulties involved in career planning. Professional planning needs to take into account personal interests, abilities, values, family background and other factors. These factors are not fully developed in the age and psychological state of high school students. 3. Professional planning was not an easy task. It required time and energy. High school students did not have enough experience and ability to plan their careers. They had to wait until they were in college or when they were adults to plan their careers. To sum up, I don't think high school students should plan their career. They should focus on their studies to lay a solid foundation for their future.
Positive point of view: High school students studying abroad played an important role in their personal growth and future development. Studying abroad could allow students to come into contact with different cultures, languages, and ways of thinking, thus developing an international vision and cross-cultural communication skills. In addition, studying abroad could also improve students 'English level and expand employment channels, which had a positive impact on future career development. However, there were certain risks and challenges in studying abroad. High school students were young and lacked the ability to live independently and cope with complex situations. They needed the full support and care of their parents and society. The language and cultural environment of the country may be different from that of China. Students need to spend a lot of time and energy to adapt and learn. At the same time, they also need to face economic and security risks and challenges. To sum up, studying abroad is an important educational choice for high school students, but it requires the full understanding and support of students, parents and society. The school should provide comprehensive guidance and support to help students adapt to the life of studying abroad, establish good interpersonal relationships, and ensure the safety and health of students. Opposite point of view: High school students should not be encouraged to study abroad unless they and their parents have made sufficient preparations and considerations. Studying abroad required a lot of financial, time, and psychological pressure. At the same time, one had to face all kinds of uncertainties and risks. It was every student's right to receive a better education in the country. High school students studying abroad may have a negative impact on their future development. The language and cultural environment of the country you study in may be different from that of your home country. Students need to spend a lot of time and energy to adapt and learn, which may have a negative impact on their studies and future development. In addition, studying abroad may also increase the financial burden of the family and affect the stability and quality of life of the family. To sum up, it is not a good choice for high school students to study abroad unless the students and parents have made sufficient preparations and considerations. Students should receive better education in China and make the most suitable choice for their development according to their actual situation and goals.
The positive side believes that cooperation is better than competition because: 1. Cooperation could create greater value. In a competitive market, companies need to constantly introduce new products and improve services to attract consumers. However, if all companies adopted the same strategy, the market would become more transparent and the competition would become more intense. Cooperation could help companies find new innovation points to create more diverse products and services to better meet the needs of consumers and create greater value. Cooperation could bring more opportunities. In a competitive market, companies need to constantly expand into new markets and customer bases. However, if all companies were to explore new markets, they would face fierce competition and risks. Cooperation could help companies find more opportunities to explore new markets and customer bases by cooperating with other companies, reduce risks, and increase efficiency. 3. Cooperation could enhance the cohesiveness and competitiveness of enterprises. In a competitive market, companies need to constantly improve their competitiveness in order to gain a foothold in the market. However, if the competition between enterprises was too intense, it would easily lead to a decline in cohesion between enterprises and even lead to division and opposition. Cooperation could help enterprises build strong team cohesion, enhance cooperation and trust between enterprises, and thus improve the competitiveness of enterprises. The opposing side believes that competition is better than cooperation because: Competition can stimulate innovation and creativity in enterprises. In a competitive market, companies need to constantly introduce new products and improve services to attract consumers. However, if all companies adopted the same strategy, the market would become more transparent and the competition would become more intense. Competition could stimulate the innovation and creativity of enterprises to find new innovation points and create more diverse products and services to better meet the needs of consumers. Competition can improve the efficiency and effectiveness of enterprises. In a competitive market, companies need to constantly improve their competitiveness in order to gain a foothold in the market. However, if all enterprises adopted the same strategy, the efficiency and effectiveness between enterprises would decline and even lead to losses. Competition can improve the efficiency and benefit of enterprises. Through the establishment and optimization of competition mechanism, it can improve the competitiveness and market share of enterprises.
Honorable judges, dear listeners, today I, as the opposing party, would like to raise a point: middle school students should not read extra-cursory books. First of all, we need to be clear about what extra-cursory books are. Extra-cursory books referred to any books other than textbooks and course materials, including novels, essays, poems, biographies, history, philosophy, and so on. In this information age, we are easily surrounded by all kinds of media and access to a huge amount of information, but we often ignore the power of books. Books can teach us knowledge, inspire us to think, cultivate our imagination and creativity, which are the basic skills we need in modern society. However, for middle school students, reading extra-cursory books might bring some negative effects. First of all, textbooks and course materials were the foundation of their learning. These materials could meet their basic learning needs. If middle school students read too many extra-cursory books, it may distract their attention and affect their academic performance. Secondly, excessive reading of extra-cursory books may lead to the decline of middle school students 'reading ability, affecting their future learning and development. In addition, the content of the extra-cursory books might not be suitable for middle school students to read. Some books involve sensitive topics, violence, sex, and other content. If middle school students read these books, it may have a negative impact on their physical and mental health. Moreover, the content of some books may be too complicated or difficult to understand, which may have a negative impact on the thinking ability of middle school students. Therefore, I think middle school students should focus on studying textbooks and course materials instead of reading extra-cursory books. At the age of students, they should concentrate on learning basic knowledge and cultivate their own thinking ability and creativity, which is the key to future success.
Competition and cooperation were both important in life. There was no absolute contradiction between the two. Competition can stimulate people's creativity and innovation, and encourage people to constantly improve their abilities in their respective fields. At the same time, competition could also encourage people to learn from each other and improve together through cooperation. In the competitive modern society, we need to have keen insight and flexible response strategies to stand out in the fierce competition. Cooperation allowed people to help and support each other to achieve greater success with a common goal. In teamwork, people could use their own strengths to complete a task together to achieve better results. In addition, cooperation could also promote the development and progress of society and create more value for human society. We have seen many successful examples in modern society. For example, many successful companies in the technology field relied on teamwork. In the business world, many successful companies achieved success through teamwork. In addition, many outstanding students in the field of education also achieved their goals through teamwork. Therefore, we believe that competition and cooperation are both important in life. On the road of fierce competition in life, we need to have keen insight and flexible response strategies to stand out in the fierce competition; on the road of cooperation, we need to learn to cooperate and play our respective advantages to complete a task together to achieve greater success.
An argument could be a fact or a reason. Factual argument refers to using specific facts to prove a certain point of view or argument. For example, using a real example of a famous person to prove that one's point of view is correct. A logical argument refers to the use of reason or theory to prove a certain point of view or argument, such as using a certain philosophical concept or moral code to prove that one's point of view is correct. Metaphorical argument can be a fact or a reason argument. It can use specific examples or figurative metaphor to support a certain point of view or argument, so as to make the argument more vivid, vivid, and easy to understand. For example, using Sun Wukong's Golden Cudgel and the Earth as a metaphor to prove that the Earth is the center of the universe can make people understand this point more deeply.