Op right away you say, even though I putted the Op tag. And are you saying I should NERF The shadow Monarch?

I admit my mistake from that part for not looking at the tags but i still stand with my review, i may change it in the future if the future chapters improve, i may not be an ethical person but i am fair

Let's not talk about that. Let's talk about him being too op part. Too op in Marvel? are u good bro? maybe watching the MCU softened you but a person like me who reads the comics... He's not Too Op at all. Plus I putted his power level just like I imagined, I mean you know what the rulers were capable of Right? And he was the strongest of them all. So If what you wish is NERFING the mc... then that's a different subject.

i didn't wish for you to NERF the mc but it would have been a good arc or character development if he grows stronger as the story goes, becoming op right away gets boring fast, it would've been better if it was like weak to op, similarly to Marvel : Gamer path but i do get where you are coming from because he did transmigrate into the body of a monarch, i did say earlier that it was my mistake for not seeing the op tag.

Then logically speaking, we shouldn't have this conversation at all. I mean sure it's better to have a devolvement and growth but you read the description right? (ignoring the fact that you didn't see the op tag) He was transmigrated to Ashborn's body he was already op. Normally a person would give a low star review for somethings that are supposed to be in the novel but aren't, but here you are giving a low review because I didn't write about the opposite of what I wrote in the description (Already OP≠growth)

Bottom line is: Your low review isn't logical at all.

My review is a criticism of your book but rather than focusing on other stuff, you only focused on the op part, i already said it was my mistake in the BEGINNING yet you didn't try to argue other things i said in my review, so this argument is that you being petty and can't handle criticism. my review is valid and as i said IN THE BEGINNING of this argument that i MIGHT change my review in the future if your book gets good.

Yes normally people would do that but also people will rate a book low stars if the book is not good, i know right surprisingly people also do that.

i didn't give you a low star because of that but you rather focused on the op part rather the important part that you have to improve your writing quality and story development, because the story is already boring in the beginning not giving us anything interesting at all, rather than giving the mc a concubine right away.

To be fair, he gave you a 2.5. He's being neutral. He told you the weak and strong points of the story while staying neutral as much as possible, and giving you his own opinion. You want to see what kind of review is illogical? Here's an example: 1star on Writing Quality, Updating Stability, Story Development, Character Design, world background. Accompanied by countless emojis and literal spams of words like "Not read" for NO REASON.