The idea is great. The setting is novel enough to catch anyone's eye. The writing is also good. Sadly, that's all this fic has in terms of hooks. It's worth a try, but be warned that the MC is a teenager given power. He's edge given form and all good things that happen in the story are because of him. Of course, any time something bad happens has nothing to do with the MC and the Teen Chad McEdge is always there to sav- observe, he won't save, cause morals are for those of lesser edge. He also starts liking a girl, but obiously won't love. Love is not for Chad MC's.
Liked by 53 people
LIKE
You can really find all kinds of people in the review section. Normally, I wouldn’t comment on random reviews, especially when it isn’t my own story. However, this isn’t something you’d call informative. It irks me when people attempt to sum up a story by saying “This is all it is,” as if that somehow lowers its quality. You can literally say that about any story, but the only thing you achieve by doing that is making everything boring. While this may not be the best story ever written, it isn’t quite fair to simplify it by spamming a word (edgy), without even knowing what it means. In the first place, every single one of the ‘100 characters’ in the show ARE teenagers. The MC, being ‘A teenager with power,’ literally just means that he’s better. Once again, summarizing a characters behavior down to a single word (especially when you don’t understand it’s dictionary definition), is distasteful. People are complex. Perhaps you’d call a nice person ‘Empathetic,’ but that’s only one aspect of their personality. Would you call all apathetic people ‘Edgy’ simply because they don’t feel the way you think they should? —Anyway. It’s obviously a wish fulfillment story which should’ve been made apparent by ‘The Gamer’ system being present. Take it with a grain of salt. Enjoy it for what it is. Think a bit more and stop complaining about nonsense.
and as reviewers are not paid professionals and reviews are opiniated by nature hes is in his right
You aren’t wrong, but I never said their review was objectively incorrect. I said it wasn’t exactly informative. Thus, I elaborated on that statement (Providing my own opinion).
still better then 95% of the glazin 5* (useless) reviews and way more trustworthy
