Review Detail of RedTheVariant in Cyberpunk's Singular Peculiarity
Review detail
ok. I haven't read this yet so I won't give it a high rating. but if it's anything like elder blood Witcher I'm going to hate it. but I liked steel waste. besides the ending. and I haven't even touched unbound familiar given your track record with romance. and forced you make the romance. or god forbid EBWs "romance". because most if not all of zero no tsukaima focuses on the relationship between Saito and Louise. so I'll give this a shot. pls to butcher the characters like in EBW
Cyberpunk's Singular Peculiarity
Niggross
Liked by 37 people
LIKEReplies24
RuberDF:I know how you feel man, but I assure you that his last work on unbound familiar is really good, the romance there was done very well, the low rating it’s because a Ret&rd with Down syndrome keep spamming 1 star rating like that was his life objective (witch it probably is)
ZJAY_1:if there was a downvote button I would use it cause who tf post a review when they haven't even read the story. I keep forgetting how toxic this community can be.image
ArtoriaPendragon_:He’s only doing this because of what the author did in Elder Blood Witcher
ZJAY_1:wow imma go read it and reply to every single one of his comments out of spite
ArtoriaPendragon_:Well, considering Elder Blood Witcher and what happened in it, I can’t blame the reviewer.
yes, you can. If he want to complain hr can do it in that novel. people are gonna come here and leave because they see a 2 star review from someone that didn't even read the novel
ArtoriaPendragon_:Well, considering Elder Blood Witcher and what happened in it, I can’t blame the reviewer.
i actually don't get people who reviews a book that they haven't read yet based on another book that they read from the same author that they didn't like. why can't you review a book for what it is instead of just judging the book based on previous novels. Like you said you liked steel waste but not ebw, both from the same author but based on different things. review the book based on the book please instead of based on another completely different book. also would appreciate it if you took this review down and make another review based what you actually think of the book if you have read it yet. it's not fair for the author to have people turn away from the reviews because of the 2 stars that you gave when you haven't read it yet. this section is exactly as the name implies. a review.
Pogiako_Jazz:i actually don't get people who reviews a book that they haven't read yet based on another book that they read from the same author that they didn't like. why can't you review a book for what it is instead of just judging the book based on previous novels. Like you said you liked steel waste but not ebw, both from the same author but based on different things. review the book based on the book please instead of based on another completely different book. also would appreciate it if you took this review down and make another review based what you actually think of the book if you have read it yet. it's not fair for the author to have people turn away from the reviews because of the 2 stars that you gave when you haven't read it yet. this section is exactly as the name implies. a review.
yeah ok but my whole point is to review the book after reading it instead of before. since you said read till 120, that's plenty enough for a review, instead this person at the time he/she 'reviewed' this didn't really read it instead judged it based on the author's previous books.
TSO7:He lets his sister's rapist live
