eh, it was good, but then the cliche hits. mc saves a little demon girl and helps her cultivate. couldn't be bothered to know what happens after. If ur into these kinds of stories, then go on ahead.
Liked by 10 people
LIKE
Alright, I personally ask you to delete your review. He saves the daughter of a mother he kills, because after EXECUTING THE MOTHER, he finds out she is completely innocent, and hasn’t sinned once. Now, if you would bother to read further, you would realize that it simply means we don’t have an emotionless MC that has his own thoughts.
It’s also just a weird thing to completely stop reading the story for because of how little attention the novel places on her. Like she gets a line or two acknowledging her existence every 5 chapters or so.
Xhaare:Alright, I personally ask you to delete your review. He saves the daughter of a mother he kills, because after EXECUTING THE MOTHER, he finds out she is completely innocent, and hasn’t sinned once. Now, if you would bother to read further, you would realize that it simply means we don’t have an emotionless MC that has his own thoughts.
Well well. Look at what we have here. Nepotism and a misleading review. I read the novel till 20 chapters and the fox girl only got mentioned once or twice and has very little presence. If I didn't see this review, I'd totally forgotten that she existed.
Alright book simp, people can have other opinions than you. No need to ask people to delete their reviews for reviewing a book you like with bad scores.
Xhaare:Alright, I personally ask you to delete your review. He saves the daughter of a mother he kills, because after EXECUTING THE MOTHER, he finds out she is completely innocent, and hasn’t sinned once. Now, if you would bother to read further, you would realize that it simply means we don’t have an emotionless MC that has his own thoughts.
Book SIMP he says. I’m supporting a trial read, and this review explicitly states that he couldn’t be bothered to read further to understand the anthors intention because of it. I simply hope for this trial read to be picked over all the others this week.
King_Of_Loneliness:Alright book simp, people can have other opinions than you. No need to ask people to delete their reviews for reviewing a book you like with bad scores.
Okay man, you're acting like like this is a masterpiece, it's not. Anyway it is the prerogative of the reader to read or not to read, you see? If this person is put off and writes a review about that then that's their choice. If I am put off by something and felt like I couldn't bother to read further then it is fine because that's my opinion on the story so far. So what if that was triggered by the introduction of certain elements into the story? So what if it was triggered by the introduction of a certain character? It doesn't matter because by the end of the day all reviews are subjective. I personally don't like this book so I write a review. Should I be attacked for that just because of my opinion? No I should not. I personally don't write retorts and arguments against reviews I don't like because I respect their opinion even if I disagree or think their review is stupid. You should try to do the same.
Xhaare:Book SIMP he says. I’m supporting a trial read, and this review explicitly states that he couldn’t be bothered to read further to understand the anthors intention because of it. I simply hope for this trial read to be picked over all the others this week.
uuuuu its violence in here~~~~
Reviews have no true effect on if a novel gets selected it's all about how much and how many people contribute (purchase and use "coins"), the novel with the highest number of "coins" in the Fan tab gets selected.
Xhaare:Book SIMP he says. I’m supporting a trial read, and this review explicitly states that he couldn’t be bothered to read further to understand the anthors intention because of it. I simply hope for this trial read to be picked over all the others this week.
nobody's complaining about him writing a review with low ratings.. the complain of that what he has written is wrong.. he read part of it n assumed the rest misleading others from reading the novel
King_Of_Loneliness:Okay man, you're acting like like this is a masterpiece, it's not. Anyway it is the prerogative of the reader to read or not to read, you see? If this person is put off and writes a review about that then that's their choice. If I am put off by something and felt like I couldn't bother to read further then it is fine because that's my opinion on the story so far. So what if that was triggered by the introduction of certain elements into the story? So what if it was triggered by the introduction of a certain character? It doesn't matter because by the end of the day all reviews are subjective. I personally don't like this book so I write a review. Should I be attacked for that just because of my opinion? No I should not. I personally don't write retorts and arguments against reviews I don't like because I respect their opinion even if I disagree or think their review is stupid. You should try to do the same.
you speak as if people will support the novel without reading it.. I almost didn't read the novel after noticing this review
nyc_broy:Reviews have no true effect on if a novel gets selected it's all about how much and how many people contribute (purchase and use "coins"), the novel with the highest number of "coins" in the Fan tab gets selected.
for people who want to know what happens with that beast.. even before the end of trial read he has let off that beast.. he doesn't want any relationship with beasts but he doesn't mind saving innocent ones if it won't cause any trouble.. he just kept that beast with him until he can release it safely
You're kinda right but wrong in some places. This review was very misleading. If it was someone that can't take that kind of stuff, they would've left immediately. You also have to consider that you might not think that this novel is good but someone will think it's great. And people generally don't like others saying bad things about what they like. I kinda agree with you on respecting other's opinions but this is the internet. If you write something, you gotta be prepared to get attacked. You might be unlucky and meet someone who's having a bad day and needs to let off some steam.
King_Of_Loneliness:Okay man, you're acting like like this is a masterpiece, it's not. Anyway it is the prerogative of the reader to read or not to read, you see? If this person is put off and writes a review about that then that's their choice. If I am put off by something and felt like I couldn't bother to read further then it is fine because that's my opinion on the story so far. So what if that was triggered by the introduction of certain elements into the story? So what if it was triggered by the introduction of a certain character? It doesn't matter because by the end of the day all reviews are subjective. I personally don't like this book so I write a review. Should I be attacked for that just because of my opinion? No I should not. I personally don't write retorts and arguments against reviews I don't like because I respect their opinion even if I disagree or think their review is stupid. You should try to do the same.
Sorry, I don't come to this site often but I did say "true effect." I wouldn't doubt people read despite bad reviews with the 'membership' thing, seeing as how so many trial reads get picked while having less than 3 stars.
shv_luffy98:you speak as if people will support the novel without reading it.. I almost didn't read the novel after noticing this review
well some people read the novel without checking the reviews, some people read the novel after reading the reviews if the reviews are good and some of them read if there's nothing in the micro which really doesn't stick right with them (saving a demon kinda stuff mentioned in the review).. so whatever nonsense you're talking about true effect.. a significant portion of people who read based on reviews won't be supporting the novel.. there's no TRUE EFFECT?? what a load of bs
nyc_broy:Sorry, I don't come to this site often but I did say "true effect." I wouldn't doubt people read despite bad reviews with the 'membership' thing, seeing as how so many trial reads get picked while having less than 3 stars.
*novel (in place of micro)
shv_luffy98:well some people read the novel without checking the reviews, some people read the novel after reading the reviews if the reviews are good and some of them read if there's nothing in the micro which really doesn't stick right with them (saving a demon kinda stuff mentioned in the review).. so whatever nonsense you're talking about true effect.. a significant portion of people who read based on reviews won't be supporting the novel.. there's no TRUE EFFECT?? what a load of bs
Hmm, it seems like you aren't taking into account the system for picking novels (that will be continued), you know contribution through coins, that I mentioned (there's also the coin to chapter unlock system/membership price to take into account, translator contracts). That's a lot of conjecture, you know what, you're probably right.
shv_luffy98:well some people read the novel without checking the reviews, some people read the novel after reading the reviews if the reviews are good and some of them read if there's nothing in the micro which really doesn't stick right with them (saving a demon kinda stuff mentioned in the review).. so whatever nonsense you're talking about true effect.. a significant portion of people who read based on reviews won't be supporting the novel.. there's no TRUE EFFECT?? what a load of bs
