2 chapters in and MC uses 3 girls who were “appreciative of him” to destress himself. They were “full of smiles” after and MC responded with a “helpless smile”. It was only a paragraph but it showed me that MC is shallow and a mansl*t. That he would sleep with any women that shows interest of him. Mistreats women unlike OG Leylin. No intricate relationship and if there would be one in the future, it would seem forced. I hate these kinds of MC so I dropped. Disappointed as I thought MC would have a more calm and practical outlook, but he acts wantonly. That since there is no Harem Tag, there would be more delving into the world. I don’t know if it would get better plot-wise but the story didn’t interest me anymore after reading that passage. I didn’t like the MC but I can’t say the same for you. So go read and give this a try since this is the first Warock in the Magis World fanfic I saw on this site.
Liked by 128 people
LIKEAlways been lenient towards men? Are you high? Are women drafted and forced to fight in war? No, they aren't even drafted and forced to do non life threatening work to support the war. Is a guy more likely to get custody of his children, even if he can provide a better environment to the child? No, he is more likely to be forced to pay his ex wife to take care of his child. If a woman attacks a man at home and gets hurt in response, is the man likely to get justice? No, if the woman has a few bruises she can get away with stabbing him to death because of domestic violence self defense laws. Gender inequality IS a thing, but saying that society is always lenient toward men is the most ignorant, bigoted, $exist, agenda pushing thing you could have said. It's called GENDER inequality. Not FEMALE inequality. :
“Are women drafted and forced to fight in wars?” Do you mean the wars that were created by men? And did you miss the part where I said women were conditioned by the patriarch society? It’s the men that have made and portrayed women as weak and to be protected. And you blame them by not being useful for war??? Also you say non-life threatening as if women didn’t help in the previous wars. Some worked in factories that were making bombs in which they could explode if an accident happens. You say men were forced and you blame in it on women. But have you ever looked deeply why men were forced? Yeah, that’s what you get when society is the one making them look so strong and mighty. “Is a guy more likely to have custody over his children,...” Society has their biases and women are more culturally and historically better parents than men. Why do you think that is? But the current law no longer presumes men are better parents than women, since they are taking the child’s interest into account. Also, you don’t know their story, and most of the time, it is the men who are the cause of the seperation because of their abusive mentality(like yours) and actions. “...even if he can provide a better environment for the child?” And this is where the problem lies. Because people similar to you already believe men as superior and that they are the correct choice. “Better environment” doesn’t mean it’s the best for the child. Let the child choose. This is not the matter of which gender. “If a woman attacks a man at home, is the man likely to get justice?” No one attacks others for no reason unless they have a sickness. But you and your hypotheticals are quite scary. Your mindset is dangerous. First of all, we don’t know the full story so hold your horses. Women have the advantage of domestic violence because through accumulated data, men are most likely the cause. You have your opinion in that hypothesis and I have mine. My opinion is that that is the first time that the women attacked the man “at home” for self-defense, but the bruises on the women’s body are acumulated over the course of many days/weeks. You asking that question is scary because you are probably one of those people who believe that marriage means consent. That is incorrect and that is dangerous. You only seems to only care about men when the women fights back or blame women for things caused by men. Why is that? Do better.
Valid and I understand. I didn’t continue reading since I lost interest at what he’s doing. But I don’t think what I said was s*xism if he uses women as carnal objects to destress. It’s a matter of objectification and dehumanization and I hate these kinds of MC. I didn’t say that women don’t do that, it’s not only aimed at men. But I guess my comment could be misconstrued by some men.
I would like to know because I think your arguments are totally wrong in most developed countries. That and the patriarchy thing is just stupidly wrong. I say that because unlike most, I inform myself by checking facts, asking concerned people and trying to look at the situation from both points of view.
Wrong about “most developed countries”? Just because they have had women leaders doesn’t mean that the patriarch ideologies have vanished. Also you claim as if I myself didn’t look at citations and didnt have an objective view when looking at them. As if I would be passionate without researching first. For you to believe that patriarchy does not exist in the current societies tells me that you didn’t look at facts but instead at biased sources. And if you really want to know. I was born in the Philippines and currently live in the US(hotpot of cultures). I have family/friends in Canada and I have personal friends living in Europe and Asia. So if you want to appeal through ethos(“asking concerned people”), then I believe that I am knowledgeable enough. At least I don’t claim that something is stupid/wrong, but claim that there is something that need reforming/improvements. Reactive Vs Proactive.
Wrong about “most developed countries”? Just because they have had women leaders doesn’t mean that the patriarch ideologies have vanished. Also you claim as if I myself didn’t look at citations and didnt have an objective view when looking at them. As if I would be passionate without researching first. For you to believe that patriarchy does not exist in the current societies tells me that you didn’t look at facts but instead at biased sources. And if you really want to know. I was born in the Philippines and currently live in the US(hotpot of cultures). I have family/friends in Canada and I have personal friends living in Europe and Asia. So if you want to appeal through ethos(“asking concerned people”), then I believe that I am knowledgeable enough. At least I don’t claim that something is stupid/wrong, but claim that there is something that need reforming/improvements. Reactive Vs Proactive.
Not really. I truly mean you live in cuckoo land. It, not an insult but a fact. Here is the simple definition from google. "cuckoo land is a state of absurdly, over-optimistic fantasy or an unrealistically idealistic state where everything is perfect. Someone who is said to "live in cloud cuckoo land" is a person who thinks that things that are completely impossible might happen," Arguing with you would be arguing like with a religious senseless fanatic, no way to change your flawed thinking. Anyway bye. Have fun.