ragnar blackmane vs ghazghkull thraka

No, Ragnar is likely fictional with elements inspired by historical events and figures, but not a strictly true story.

Yes, Ragnar Lothbrok is a fictional character. He's often depicted in various works of fiction, but there's no historical evidence to confirm his exact existence as portrayed.

It's a bit of a mix. Some parts of the story might be based on real events and figures, but there's also a lot of fictional elements added for entertainment.

The story of Ragnar Lothbrok is based on historical figures and events, but it's not a completely accurate account. It takes some creative liberties for entertainment purposes.

Not entirely. While it's inspired by historical events and figures, there's a lot of creative license taken for dramatic effect.

The real story of Ragnar Lothbrok is a subject of historical debate and interpretation. Some believe he was a powerful Viking leader, while others think he might be a combination of several figures or even partly fictional.

Ragnar Lothbrok was a legendary Viking figure whose story is a blend of historical facts and myth. Some believe he was a real warrior and leader, but much of his tale has been embellished over time.

Ragnar Lodbrok exists in a gray area. There's evidence that he was a real person, but much of what we know about him has been embellished and passed down through oral traditions and stories, blurring the line between reality and fiction.

The order can vary depending on different editions and publishing dates. You might want to check the author's official website or a reliable book database for the most accurate sequence.

Try using specific keywords related to Ragnar and 'How to Train Your Dragon' on search engines. Also, check out fan forums where people might recommend good fanfictions.