It depends. Some aspects of the Batman adaptations are very close to the comics, but there are also some differences to make it more suitable for the screen.
The boys' adaptation of the comics has its ups and downs. Some parts are very faithful, while others deviate a bit for various reasons like creative choices or story simplification.
The Invincible show is a reasonably accurate adaptation of the comics. It captures the key elements and maintains the essence of the source material. Some details might be tweaked for visual or narrative purposes, but it doesn't stray far from the comic's foundation.
Not really. Riverdale takes a lot of creative liberties and strays quite far from the original Archie Comics in terms of plot and character development.
Overall, the Boys show has some resemblance to the comics, but it also makes some changes to fit the TV format and audience preferences. Some characters and plotlines might deviate from the original source.
The 'Invincible' adaptation is not exactly the same as the comics. There could be differences in the way scenes are depicted, character development, or the order of events. But both have their own appeal.