The Bone comic could have been banned for reasons like having controversial themes, offensive language, or not adhering to the standards set by the relevant authorities. Maybe it was too violent or dealt with sensitive subjects in a way that wasn't deemed suitable for public consumption.
Well, maybe it's because there are certain elements in the comic that seem to unfairly represent or treat characters based on their race, leading to the perception of racism.
I'm not sure exactly, but there are quite a few. You might have to check with the publisher or some dedicated comic book databases for an accurate count.
The comic review of 'Batman: A True Story' could focus on how the art style enhances the narrative. The dark and brooding visuals often associated with Batman might be used to great effect here. The true story aspect could also mean that it shows a side of Gotham that is more believable, like the corruption and the everyday struggles of its citizens that Batman tries to combat.
Start by looking at the art style. Is it appealing and does it suit the story? Then, consider the plot. Is it engaging and well-paced? Also, think about the characters - are they developed and relatable?