Well, a raw story is like the initial, untouched version of something that happened. It doesn't have all the polish and refinement that you might find in a more finished news article or narrative. It's kind of like getting the story straight from the source, without any added fluff.
If you want to read a new raw story, you can also check out some local writing groups or online forums where writers share their first drafts. These stories often have a certain rawness and authenticity that can be really engaging. They might not be perfect in terms of grammar or plot, but they can offer a fresh perspective.
It depends. Some sources within 'the raw story' might be very reliable if they base their reporting on facts and evidence. However, without a more in - depth look at its editorial policies and fact - checking procedures, it's hard to say for sure.
Raw Story's reliability is a mixed bag. Some of their stories are solid and based on good research, but others might lack sufficient verification. So, it's best to approach their content with a critical eye.
I'm not sure. 'Raw' could be a mix of real and made-up elements. It's best to look for official statements or reviews from reliable sources to determine if it has a true story basis.