I think Jurassic Park is more science fiction. It introduced the revolutionary idea of bringing dinosaurs back to life, which was a huge sci-fi concept at the time. Jurassic World expanded on that but didn't introduce as radical new ideas.
Yes, Jurassic World is typically classified as science fiction. It involves genetic engineering and the recreation of dinosaurs, which are common elements in sci-fi.
Jurassic World and Jurassic Park have some similarities and differences. Both feature dinosaurs and a theme of humans interacting with them. But Jurassic World has more advanced technology and larger-scale park operations.
It depends on the level of violence and complex themes in the novel. If it has a lot of intense dinosaur - on - dinosaur or dinosaur - on - human violence, it might not be suitable for very young readers.
The fictional island where Jurassic World Park was constructed is Isla Nublar. It's a remote and isolated location that provided the setting for the park's dinosaur attractions.
One possible plotline could be the RWBY characters' reactions to the dinosaurs in Jurassic World. They might be amazed, scared or even try to fight the dinosaurs depending on their personalities.
One interesting storyline could be an original character (oc) who is a dinosaur trainer in training. They start off being clumsy but gradually bond with a velociraptor and learn to communicate with it in unique ways. Another could be an oc that discovers a new, previously unknown species of dinosaur on the island and has to fight to protect it from being exploited by the park's management.
One of the main themes is the danger of playing God. In the novel, humans' attempts to control and manipulate dinosaurs lead to chaos. Another theme is the power of nature. The dinosaurs, as products of nature, resist human control and reassert their dominance in their own way.