I think Jurassic Park is more science fiction. It introduced the revolutionary idea of bringing dinosaurs back to life, which was a huge sci-fi concept at the time. Jurassic World expanded on that but didn't introduce as radical new ideas.
Yes, Jurassic World is typically classified as science fiction. It involves genetic engineering and the recreation of dinosaurs, which are common elements in sci-fi.
Jurassic World and Jurassic Park have some similarities and differences. Both feature dinosaurs and a theme of humans interacting with them. But Jurassic World has more advanced technology and larger-scale park operations.
I'm not sure exactly as I haven't read it. But it might be about a character who is raised by raptors. Maybe it tells the story of their survival, how they adapt to the raptor - like lifestyle, and the challenges they face growing up in such an unusual environment.
I don't know for sure, but I assume the main character is the person who is raised by raptors. There might also be some important raptors that play significant roles, like the alpha raptor or the one that first took in the human.
It depends on the level of violence and complex themes in the novel. If it has a lot of intense dinosaur - on - dinosaur or dinosaur - on - human violence, it might not be suitable for very young readers.
The fictional island where Jurassic World Park was constructed is Isla Nublar. It's a remote and isolated location that provided the setting for the park's dinosaur attractions.
One possible plotline could be the RWBY characters' reactions to the dinosaurs in Jurassic World. They might be amazed, scared or even try to fight the dinosaurs depending on their personalities.