The story might have focused on the influence of the media on the 2016 election from a business angle. For example, it could have explored which media outlets had the most impact on swaying public opinion and how that translated into financial success or failure for those media companies. It could also have delved into the role of social media platforms as part of the media landscape during the election and their business models related to election coverage.
It could teach us about how media companies adjusted their business strategies during the 2016 election. They might have changed their advertising rates or focused on different types of content to attract more viewers or readers.
It's likely not a common term. The LA Times uses more specific designations for its stories like 'feature story', 'investigative report', etc. 'la times long story' might be an ad - hoc or very specific reference to a particular piece that someone has given, rather than a standard term within the newspaper's lexicon.
I don't have enough information to determine who wrote the 'la times story'. There are many journalists working for the LA Times, and it could be any one of them.
I'm not sure specifically as you haven't provided the content of the 'la times story'. It could be about various topics such as politics, entertainment, local events in Los Angeles, or business.
In the 'Times Magazine election story', we may find out about the campaigns of the various contenders. It might include their strategies, how they fundraised, and the key messages they were trying to convey. Additionally, it could cover the impact of external factors like the economy or international relations on the election.
I'm not sure specifically as you haven't provided more details about this 'la times ap story'. It could be about various topics such as politics, entertainment, sports or local events in Los Angeles. Maybe it's a story that the LA Times sourced from the Associated Press (AP).