ny times reporter faked stories

It might be discovered in several ways. Sometimes, sources of the story come forward and say that the information was misrepresented or completely made up. Other times, a careful review of the reporter's work, looking at details such as dates, quotes, and events that seem too good to be true, can reveal the fakery. There could also be whistleblowers within the NY Times who notice unethical behavior and report it.

The consequences are multiple. For the NY Times, it might face a public relations nightmare. There could be investigations into how such faking could occur within their editorial process. In the wider journalism field, it can contribute to the general public's growing cynicism towards the media. The reporter's career is probably over, at least in mainstream journalism. And if the faked stories had an impact on public opinion or certain events, there could be legal implications as well, for example if false information led to harm to someone's reputation or business.

Yes, they are. They show real - life examples of love, which can inspire readers to believe in love and pursue their own relationships. The stories of how people find love against all odds can be very motivating.

One example could be some of its reporting on certain political events where the facts were later found to be misrepresented. For instance, in a story about a policy implementation, they might have exaggerated the negative impacts without fully considering all the aspects and data available at the time.

There are some who think that the NYT's coverage of political campaigns contains 'fake stories'. For instance, during an election, if a story is published about a candidate's past actions that doesn't align with the way a particular group wants to view the candidate. But in reality, the NYT is reporting based on sources and evidence. They may not always get it 100% right, but it's not fair to simply label it as 'fake'.

The 'ny times 2019 cemetery stories' might feature stories about cemetery maintenance and the people who take care of cemeteries. There could be accounts of restoration projects of old graves in 2019. It may also include stories of how cemeteries are used for remembrance and as a place for the community to gather, perhaps for commemorative events in that year.

I'm not sure exactly who. But when such incidents happen, it usually causes a big stir in the journalism community.

Look for lack of multiple reliable sources. If a story in the NY Times is based on just one or two sketchy sources, it could be false. For example, if it's a big expose but only quotes anonymous sources that can't be verified.

Yes. For instance, the story of an athlete who uses their platform to promote social change is inspiring. They might be advocating for equality in sports, regardless of gender or race, and through their actions, they are making a real difference both in the sports world and in society at large.

Look for multiple sources. If the NYT story is the only one reporting something in a certain way, it could be suspect. But this isn't always conclusive as they may break a story first.