Yes, they are. They show real - life examples of love, which can inspire readers to believe in love and pursue their own relationships. The stories of how people find love against all odds can be very motivating.
One example could be some of its reporting on certain political events where the facts were later found to be misrepresented. For instance, in a story about a policy implementation, they might have exaggerated the negative impacts without fully considering all the aspects and data available at the time.
There are some who think that the NYT's coverage of political campaigns contains 'fake stories'. For instance, during an election, if a story is published about a candidate's past actions that doesn't align with the way a particular group wants to view the candidate. But in reality, the NYT is reporting based on sources and evidence. They may not always get it 100% right, but it's not fair to simply label it as 'fake'.
The 'ny times 2019 cemetery stories' might feature stories about cemetery maintenance and the people who take care of cemeteries. There could be accounts of restoration projects of old graves in 2019. It may also include stories of how cemeteries are used for remembrance and as a place for the community to gather, perhaps for commemorative events in that year.
They contribute by presenting real - life cases. When people read about actual women's experiences, it gives them a more personal understanding. For instance, a story about a young woman's struggle with an unwanted pregnancy and her choice of abortion can make others more empathetic.
Look for lack of multiple reliable sources. If a story in the NY Times is based on just one or two sketchy sources, it could be false. For example, if it's a big expose but only quotes anonymous sources that can't be verified.
Yes. For instance, the story of an athlete who uses their platform to promote social change is inspiring. They might be advocating for equality in sports, regardless of gender or race, and through their actions, they are making a real difference both in the sports world and in society at large.
Look for multiple sources. If the NYT story is the only one reporting something in a certain way, it could be suspect. But this isn't always conclusive as they may break a story first.
I'm not sure specifically as I don't have the current list of 'ny times most read stories' at hand. But generally, they could include political news, international events, stories about scientific breakthroughs, and human - interest features.
The stories might also focus on the social and cultural implications of abortion. There could be accounts of how different communities view abortion, whether it is more accepted in some liberal areas compared to more conservative ones. It could also cover the stories of support groups for women who have had abortions, how these groups help the women deal with the emotional and psychological aftermath, and the role they play in destigmatizing abortion in society.