Analyze the language used. If the story uses overly emotional or loaded language instead of objective reporting, it might be a false story. For instance, if it's full of extreme adjectives to describe a situation without proper evidence to back it up.
Look for lack of multiple reliable sources. If a story in the NY Times is based on just one or two sketchy sources, it could be false. For example, if it's a big expose but only quotes anonymous sources that can't be verified.
One example could be some of its reporting on certain political events where the facts were later found to be misrepresented. For instance, in a story about a policy implementation, they might have exaggerated the negative impacts without fully considering all the aspects and data available at the time.
Look for multiple sources. If the NYT story is the only one reporting something in a certain way, it could be suspect. But this isn't always conclusive as they may break a story first.
Check if your browser has a built - in pop - up blocker. For example, in Chrome, you can go to Settings, then Privacy and security, and make sure the 'Block pop - ups' option is enabled. This might prevent the pop - ups when you're reading NY Times stories. Also, some browsers allow you to set exceptions for certain sites. So if you want to allow other pop - ups from different sites but not NY Times, you can configure that.
It might be discovered in several ways. Sometimes, sources of the story come forward and say that the information was misrepresented or completely made up. Other times, a careful review of the reporter's work, looking at details such as dates, quotes, and events that seem too good to be true, can reveal the fakery. There could also be whistleblowers within the NY Times who notice unethical behavior and report it.
Yes, they are. They show real - life examples of love, which can inspire readers to believe in love and pursue their own relationships. The stories of how people find love against all odds can be very motivating.
There are some who think that the NYT's coverage of political campaigns contains 'fake stories'. For instance, during an election, if a story is published about a candidate's past actions that doesn't align with the way a particular group wants to view the candidate. But in reality, the NYT is reporting based on sources and evidence. They may not always get it 100% right, but it's not fair to simply label it as 'fake'.
Look for multiple sources. If a story in the New York Times seems to rely on just one, uncorroborated source, it could be suspect. However, the Times usually has a standard of using multiple sources for most of its major stories.
The 'ny times 2019 cemetery stories' might feature stories about cemetery maintenance and the people who take care of cemeteries. There could be accounts of restoration projects of old graves in 2019. It may also include stories of how cemeteries are used for remembrance and as a place for the community to gather, perhaps for commemorative events in that year.
If you have a subscription to The New York Times, you will have full access to all of their interactive stories. You can also use their mobile app. The app has a user - friendly interface that makes it convenient to navigate through the different interactive features.
You can try to visit the official website of The New York Times. They might have a section dedicated to these stories, either as a series or within their archives.