Well, the first common element is the use of personal fear. Since it's first person, the narrator's own fears are highlighted. For instance, if the person is afraid of the dark, the story might be set in a pitch - black place. Also, a sense of impending doom is often there. You know, like you feel something really bad is about to happen but you don't know what. And finally, there are often objects or places that seem normal at first but turn out to be very creepy, like a doll that starts to move or a mirror that shows something strange.
Well, I once had to stay overnight in a really old hotel. The elevator was making strange noises on my way up to my room. When I got to my room, the TV turned on by itself, showing a static image. I went to bed but couldn't sleep. I heard whispers in the air. I sat up and saw a face in the window. It was a pale face with hollow eyes. I quickly grabbed my things and ran out of the room, not looking back until I was out of the hotel.
It depends on your taste. Some people love the immersive feel of first-person stories, while others prefer the broader perspective of third-person ones.
The unknown is a really scary element. In person scary stories, when you don't know who or what is causing the strange events, it sends shivers down your spine. For example, in a story where a person hears unexplained noises in their house at night but can't figure out the source.
It's hard to say which is better. First person can be great for character-driven stories, while second person can be used effectively in certain experimental or interactive narratives. It all depends on how well it suits the story and how skillfully the author uses the perspective.
The first or third person of a short story depends on the author's personal preference and writing style.
First-person writing usually allows the readers to participate in the story more directly, allowing them to understand the characters and plot more deeply. This kind of writing style could enhance the realism and sense of immersion of the novel. It was more suitable for novels with strong emotional descriptions and character creation.
Third-person writing could better show the characters and plot in the story, but at the same time, it would lose some of the realism brought by first-person writing. Compared to first-person and third-person writing, it was more objective and calm to present the story, which helped to build a more rational and logical world.
Therefore, the choice of first or third person depended on the type of novel and the author's writing style. Different novels needed different writing styles to better convey the feelings and thoughts that the author wanted to express.
In first person, the story is told from the perspective of 'I'. It gives a very personal and subjective view. For example, 'I walked into the dark forest, my heart pounding.' Second person uses 'you', which is less common but can be very engaging, like 'You open the door and are shocked by what you see.' Third person is he/she/they. It's more objective, such as 'He ran towards the finish line, determined to win.'
Bias is a big issue. The first - person narrator may be unreliable due to their own beliefs, emotions, or motives. They could distort the truth or misinterpret situations. For instance, if a jealous first - person narrator is telling a love story, they might present the rival in an overly negative light. Also, the story can become self - centered. It's all about the narrator's experiences and thoughts, which might make it less engaging for readers who want a broader view of the story's world.
Well, writing in the first person can add a sense of authenticity and credibility. It makes the story seem more real because it's coming directly from the character's perspective. Plus, it can be a great way to focus the narrative and keep the reader closely tied to the main character's journey.